Purpose: The importance of coordination of educational services has been well documented in the literature. For students with disabilities, coordinated programs result in more rapid acquisition of targeted behaviors and the increased likelihood of long-term maintenance of gains. The purpose of this study was to assess whether "priming" or exposing students with autism and disruptive behaviors to school assignments before their presentation in class would affect academic performance and problem behaviors.

Method: Two students diagnosed with autism who attended general education classrooms, both of whom exhibited numerous disruptive behaviors and low academic performance, participated in this study. A repeated reversals design was used to monitor student progress.

Results: The results demonstrated decreases in problem behavior and increases in academic responding when priming sessions occurred.

Clinical Implications: Application is discussed in terms of a mechanism for speech-language pathologists to assist classroom teachers with a systematic educational coordination plan that can quickly produce improved school performance.

REFERENCES

  • Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Bryan, T., Burstein, K., & Bryan, J. (2001). Students with learning disabilities: Homework problems and promising practices.Educational Psychologist, 36, 167–180.
  • Callahan, K., & Rademacher, J. A. (1999). Using self-management strategies to increase the on-task behavior of a student with autism.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 117–122.
  • Callahan, K., Rademacher, J. A., & Hildreth, B. L. (1998). The effect of parent participation in strategies to improve the homework performance of students who are at risk.Remedial and Special Education, 19, 131–141.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer.Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
  • Derby, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Northup, J., Cigrand, K., et al. (1992). Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: A summary of 79 cases.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 713–721.
  • Dunlap, G., Foster-Johnson, L., Clarke, S., Kern, L., & Childs, K. E. (1995). Modifying activities to produce functional outcomes: Effects on the problem behaviors of students with disabilities.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 248–258.
  • Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1993). Assessment and intervention for children within the instructional curriculum.In J. Reichle & D. Wacker (Eds.), Communication and language intervention series, Vol. 3. Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 177–203). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Dunlap, G., White, R., Vera, A., Wilson, D., & Panacek, L. (1996). The effects of multi-component, assessment-based curricular modifications on the classroom behavior of children with emotional and behavioral disorders.Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 481–500.
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
  • Epstein, M. H., Munk, D. D., Bursuck, W. D., Polloway, E. A., & Jayanthi, M. (1999). Strategies for improving home-school communication about homework for students with disabilities.Journal of Special Education, 33, 166–176.
  • Epstein, M. H., Polloway, E. A., Buck, G. H., Bursuck, W. D., Wissinger, L. M., Whitehouse, F., et al. (1997). Homework-related communication problems: Perspectives of general education teachers.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 221–227.
  • Gajria, M., & Salend, S. J. (1995). Homework practices of students with and without learning disabilities: A comparison.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 291–296.
  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. , Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed, R. P., DeJong, J. M., & Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework.Educational Psychologist, 36, 195–209.
  • Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Dorsey, M. F., Zarcone, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., Smith, R. G., et al. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215–240.
  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
  • Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Dunlap, G. (Eds.). (1996). Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Koegel, R. L., Dyer, K., & Bell, L. (1987). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children’s social behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243–252.
  • R. L. Koegel, & L. K. Koegel (Eds.). (1995). Teaching children with autism: Strategies for initiating positive interactions and improving learning opportunities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Surratt, A. V. (1992). Language intervention and disruptive behavior in preschool children with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22, 141–153.
  • Kromrey, J. D., & Foster-Johnson, L. (1996). Determining the efficacy of intervention: The use of effect sizes for data analysis in single-subject research.The Journal of Experimental Education, 65(1), 73–93.
  • Learning Accomplishment Profile. (. (1992). (Chapel Hill Training-Outreach Project, Inc.). Chapel Hill: Kaplan Early Learning Company.
  • Lee, Y., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (1999). Using an instructional intervention to reduce problem and off-task behaviors.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 195–204.
  • Leiter, R. G., & Arthur, G. A. (1982). Leiter International Performance Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
  • Luiselli, J. K., & Cameron, M. J. (Eds.). (1998). Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Moes, D. R. (1998). Integrating choice-making opportunities within teacher-assigned academic tasks to facilitate the performance of children with autism.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 319–328.
  • Salend, S. J., & Gajria, M. (1995). Increasing the homework completion rates of students with mild disabilities.Remedial and Special Education, 16, 271–278.
  • Sawyer, V., Nelson, J. S., Jayanthis, M., Bursuck, W. D., & Epstein, M. H. (1996). Views of students with learning disabilities of their homework in general education classes: Student interviews.Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 70–85.
  • Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
  • Wilde, L. D., Koegel, L. K., & Koegel, R. L. (1992) Increasing success in school through priming: A training manual. University of California, Santa Barbara.
  • Zanolli, K., Daggett, J., & Adams, T. (1996). Teaching preschool-age autistic children to make spontaneous initiations to peers using priming.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 407–422.

Additional Resources