No access
Research Article
April 2004

A Meme’s Eye View of Speech-Language Pathology

Publication: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 35, Number 2
Pages 105-111

Abstract

In this article, the reason why certain terms, labels, and ideas prevail, whereas others fail to gain acceptance, will be considered. Borrowing the concept of "meme" from the study of evolution of ideas, it will be clear why language-based and phonological disorders have less widespread appeal than, for example, auditory processing and sensory integration disorders. Discussion will also center on why most speech-language pathologists refer to themselves as speech therapists or speech pathologists, and why it is more desirable to have dyslexia than to have a reading disability. In a meme’s eye view, science and logic do not always win out because selection favors ideas (memes) that are easy to understand, remember, and copy. An unfortunate consequence of these selection forces is that successful memes typically provide superficially plausible answers for complex questions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

REFERENCES

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Committee on Language. (1983, June). Definition of language. Asha, 25, 44.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Committee on Language. (1993, March). Definition of language disorders. Asha, 35, 40.
Apel, K. (1999). Checks and balances: Keeping the science in our profession. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 98–108.
Ayres, A. (1989). Sensory integration and praxis tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Bauman-Waengler, J. (2000). Articulation and phonological impairments: A clinical focus. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bellis, T. (2002). When the brain can’t hear: Unraveling the mystery of auditory processing disorder. Chicago: Atria Books.
Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Friel-Patti, S. (1999). Clinical decision-making in the assessment and intervention of central auditory processing disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 335–339.
Griffer, M. (1999). Is sensory integration effective for children with language-learning disorders? A critical review of the evidence. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 393–401.
Kamhi, A. (1992). The need for a broad-based model of phonological disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 261–269.
Mauer, D. (1999). Issues and applications of sensory integration theory and treatment with children with language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 383–393.
Newman-Ryan, J., & Kamhi, A. (2002, November). Auditory processing disorders: Sudden epidemic, (mis)diagnosis, or a good meme? Miniseminar presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA.
Nittrouer, S. (2002). From ear to cortex: A perspective on what clinicians need to understand about speech perception and language processing. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 237–253.
Owens, R. (2001). Language development: An introduction (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Rees, N. (1973). Auditory processing factors in language processing: The view from Procrustes bed. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 304–315.
Schwartz, R. (2002). Phonological disorders. In G. Shames & N. Anderson (Eds.), Human communication disorders (6th ed., pp. 141–185). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Shriberg, L., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982). Phonological disorders I: A diagnostic classification system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 242–256.
Stanovich, K. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
Torgesen, J. (1999). Assessment and instruction for phonemic awareness and word recognition skills. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 128–149). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Velleman, S., & Vihman, M. (2002). Whole-word phonology and templates: Trap, bootstrap, or some of each? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 9–24.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 35Number 2April 2004
Pages: 105-111

History

  • Received: Sep 11, 2003
  • Accepted: Oct 21, 2003
  • Published in issue: Apr 1, 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. memes
  2. speech-language pathology
  3. language disorder
  4. auditory processing disorder
  5. sensory integration disorder

Authors

Affiliations

Alan G. Kamhi [email protected]
Northern Illinois University, DeKalb

Notes

Contact author: Alan G. Kamhi, Department of Communicative Disorders, North Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115.
Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • D­ev­elopmental Language Disorders, Swaiman's Pediatric Neurology, 10.1016/B978-0-443-10944-7.00072-X, (670-675.e2), (2024).
  • Measuring children’s sustained selective attention and working memory: validity of new minimally linguistic tasks, Behavior Research Methods, 10.3758/s13428-023-02078-5, 56, 2, (709-722), (2023).
  • Public awareness of developmental language disorder in Croatia, Italy and Slovenia, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 10.1111/1460-6984.12752, 57, 6, (1269-1280), (2022).
  • “So, I told him to look for friends!” Barriers and protecting factors that may facilitate inclusion for children with Language Disorder in everyday social settings: Cross-cultural qualitative interviews with parents, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103963, 115, (103963), (2021).
  • Exploring Parental Perspectives of Childhood Speech and Language Disorders Across 10 Countries: A Pilot Qualitative Study, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00415, 64, 5, (1739-1747), (2021).
  • How aware is the public of the existence, characteristics and causes of language impairment in childhood and where have they heard about it? A European survey, Journal of Communication Disorders, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106057, 89, (106057), (2021).
  • Clinical Intersections Among Idiopathic Language Disorder, Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder, and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00050, 63, 10, (3263-3276), (2020).
  • Screening school-age children for developmental language disorder in primary care, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1080/17549507.2019.1632931, 22, 2, (152-162), (2019).
  • Five Reasons Why Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercises (NSOME) Do Not Work, Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 10.1044/sbi11.4.109, 11, 4, (109-117), (2018).
  • What Do You Mean By That? Constructive Beginnings When Working With Adolescents With Language Learning Disabilities, Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 10.1044/lle17.3.77, 17, 3, (77-84), (2018).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share