Two studies are presented providing evidence indicating the diagnostic and predictive validity of the American version of The Renfrew Bus Story (J. Cowley & C. Glasgow, 1994).

Method

Thirty-two children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 32 children with typical language development participated in the first study to determine identification accuracy of The Renfrew Bus Story. A second study of 12 children with SLI participated in a 3-year longitudinal study that was used to gather evidence of the predictive validity of The Renfrew Bus Story.

Results

The combined Information and Length scores of The Renfrew Bus Story yielded adequate (84%) sensitivity but weak (78%) specificity, making it an inappropriate tool for identifying children with language impairment or typical language development. Moderate to high correlations were found between The Renfrew Bus Story scores and nearly all scores from language tests administered 3 years later.

Implications

The evidence supports the use of The Renfrew Bus Story as an indicator of future language performance for children with SLI. However, its performance as a measure for identifying impairments during the preschool years is somewhat weaker due to overidentification of typically developing children, and in particular minority children, as having poor narrative skills.

REFERENCES

Aram, D. M., Ekelman, B. L., & Nation, J. E. (1984). Preschoolers with language disorders: 10 years later.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 232–244.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., & Edmundson, A. (1987). Language-impaired 4-year-olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 156–173.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1996). Oral and Written Language Scales: Written Expression Scale manual. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
Google Scholar
Cowley, J., & Glasgow, C. (1994). The Renfrew Bus Story: Language screening by narrative recall—Examiner’s manual. Centreville, DE: The Centreville School.
Google Scholar
Dawson, J. I., Stout, C. E., & Eyer, J. A. (2003). Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test: Third Edition. DeKalb, IL: Janelle Publications.
Google Scholar
Feagans, L., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1986). Validation of language subtypes in learning disabled children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 358–364.
Crossref Google Scholar
Fey, M. E., Catts, H. W., Proctor-Williams, K., Tomblin, J. B., & Zhang, X. (2004). Oral and written story composition skills of children with language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1301–1318.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Girolametto, L., Wiigs, M., Smyth, R., Weitzman, E., & Pearce, P. S. (2001). Children with a history of expressive vocabulary delay: Outcomes at 5 years of age.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 358–379.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Howlin, P., & Kendall, L. (1991). Assessing children with language tests: Which tests to use?.British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 355–367.
Google Scholar
Hughes, D., McGillivray, L., & Schmidek, M. (1997). Guide to narrative language: Procedures for assessment. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
Google Scholar
Merrell, A., & Plante, E. (1997). Norm-referenced test interpretation in the diagnostic process.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 50–58.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Messick, D. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment.Educational Researcher, 18, 5–11.
Crossref Google Scholar
Newcomer, P. L., & Hammill, D. D. (1997). Test of Language Development—Primary, Third Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Google Scholar
Paul, R., & Smith, R. L. (1993). Narrative skills in 4-year-olds with normal, impaired, and late-developing language.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 572–598.
Google Scholar
Perona, K., Plante, E., & Vance, R. (2005). Diagnostic accuracy of the Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test: Third edition (SPELT–3).Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 103–116.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Plante, E. (1996). Observing and interpreting behaviors: An introduction to the clinical forum.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 99–101.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Plante, E., & Vance, R. (1994). Selection of preschool language tests: A data-based approach.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 25, 15–24.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Plante, E., & Vance, R. (1995). Diagnostic accuracy of two tests of preschool language.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 70–76.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Price, J. R., Roberts, J. E., & Jackson, S. C. (2006). Structural development of fictional narratives of African American preschoolers.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 3, 178–190.
Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. (1969). The Bus Story: A test of continuous speech. North Place, Old Headington: Oxford.
Google Scholar
Spaulding, T. J., Plante, E., & Farinella, K. A. (2006). Do children with impaired language score at the low end of the normative distribution?.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 61–72.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Stothard, S. E., Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V. M., Chipcase, B. B., & Kaplan, C. A. (1998). Language-impaired preschoolers: A follow-up into adolescence.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 407–418.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Werner, E. O., & Kresheck, J. D. (1983). Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test—II. DeKalb, IL: Janelle Publications.
Google Scholar
Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (1992). Test of Word Knowledge. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery—Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Google Scholar