No access
Review Article
Clinical Forum
April 2009

A Case for the Sentence in Reading Comprehension

Publication: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 40, Number 2
Pages 184-191

Abstract

Purpose

This article addresses sentence comprehension as a requirement of reading comprehension within the framework of the narrow view of reading that was advocated in the prologue to this forum. The focus is on the comprehension requirements of complex sentences, which are characteristic of school texts.

Method

Topics included in this discussion are (a) evidence linking sentence comprehension and syntax with reading, (b) syntactic properties of sentences that make them difficult to understand, (c) clinical applications for the assessment of sentence comprehension as it relates to reading, and (d) evidence and methods for addressing sentence complexity in treatment.

Conclusion

Sentence complexity can create comprehension problems for struggling readers. The contribution of sentence comprehension to successful reading has been overlooked in models that emphasize domain-general comprehension strategies at the text level. The author calls for the evaluation of sentence comprehension within the context of content domains where complex sentences are found.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., & Low, G. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing. British Education Research Journal, 32(1)39–55.
Balthazar, C., & Scott, C. (2007). Syntax and morphology. In Kamhi, A., Masterson, J., & Apel, K. (Eds.), Clinical decision making in developmental language disorders (pp. 143–165). Baltimore: Brookes.
Berman, R. A. (2003). Genre and modality in developing discourse abilities. In Moder, C. L., & Martinovic-Ziv, A. (Eds.), Discourse across languages and cultures (pp. 329–356). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bishop, D. V. M., Adams, C. V., & Rosen, S. (2006). Resistance of grammatical impairment to computerized comprehension training in children with specific and non-specific language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 19–40.
Brady, S. (1995). The role of working memory in reading disability. In Brady, S. A., & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 129–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective. 41–74New York: Guilford Press.
Carlisle, J. (1991). Planning an assessment of listening and reading comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 12(1)17–31.
Catts, H., Adlof, S., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293.
Catts, H., Adlof, S., Hogan, T., & Ellis-Weismer, S. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396.
Catts, H., & Kamhi, A. (2005). Language and reading disabilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Cirrin, F., & Gillam, R. (2008). Language intervention practices for school-age children with spoken language disorders: A systematic review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, S110–S137.
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (1999). Classification of children with specific language impairment: Longitudinal considerations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1195–1204.
Distefano, P., & Valencia, S. (1980). The effects of syntactic maturity on comprehension of graded reading passages. The Journal of Educational Research, 73, 247–251.
Ehren, B. J. (2009). Looking through an adolescent literacy lens at the narrow view of reading. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 192–195.
Eisenberg, S. (2006). Grammar: How can I say that better? In Ukrainetz, T. (Ed.), Contextualized language intervention (pp. 145–194). Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
Francis, W., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1)6–10.
Hammill, D., Brown, V., Larsen, S., & Wiederholt, J. (1994). Test of Adolescent and Adult Language—3. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Hirschman, M. (2000). Language repair via metalinguistic means. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 251–268.
Kamhi, A. G. (2007, May 29). Knowledge deficits: The true crisis in education. The ASHA Leader, 12(7)28–29.
Kamhi, A. G. (2009). Prologue: The case for the narrow view of reading. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, xx–yy.
Leonard, L. B., Ellis Weismer, S., Miller, C. A., Francis, D. J., Tomblin, J. B., & Kail, R. V. (2007). Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 408–428.
Levy, H., & Friedmann, N. (in press). Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study. First Language.
Montgomery, J., Magimairaj, B., & O’Malley, M. H. (2008). Role of working memory in typically developing children’s complex sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 331–354.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4)342–356.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Pub. No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Neville, D., & Searls, E. (1985). The effect of sentence-combining and kernel-identification on the syntactic component of reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 37–60.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2)117–175.
Perera, K. (1984). Children’s writing and reading: Analyzing classroom language. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, V. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29, 417–447.
Rice, M. L. (2003). A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Levy, Y., & Schaeffer, J. (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 209–231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scarborough, H. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743.
Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Neuman, S.B., & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford Press.
Scarborough, H., & Dobrich, W. (1990). Development of children with early language delay. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 70–83.
Scott, C. (1995). Syntax for school children: A discourse approach. In Fey, M., Warren, S., & Windsor, J. (Eds.), Language intervention in the early school years (pp. 107–143). Baltimore: Brookes.
Scott, C. (2004a). Syntactic ability in children and adolescents with language and learning disabilities. In Berman, R. (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp. 111–134). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Scott, C. (2004b). Syntactic contributions to literacy. In Stone, A., Apel, K., & Silliman, E. (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 340–362). New York: Guilford Press.
Scott, C. (2005). Learning to write. In Catts, H., & Kamhi, A. (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 233–273). Boston: Pearson.
Scott, C., & Balthazar, C. (2008, November). Building sentence complexity: Evidence-based approaches with school-age children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Chicago, IL.
Scott, C., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse in school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—4 (CELF4). San Antonio: TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Silliman, E., & Scott, C. (2006). Language impairment and reading disability: Connections and complexities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(1)1–7.
Silliman, E., & Scott, C. (2009). Research-based oral language intervention routes to the academic language of literacy: Finding the right road. In Rosenfield, S., & Berninger, V. (Eds.), Implementing evidence-based interventions in school settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, C., & Shapiro, L. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 30–42.
Ukrainetz, T. A. (2006). Contextualized language intervention. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
Van Daal, J., Verhoeven, L., & van Balkom, H. (2004). Subtypes of severe speech and language impairments: Psychometric evidence from 4-year-old children in the Netherlands. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1411–1423.
van der Lely, H. (2003). Evidence for and implications of a domain-specific grammatical deficit. In Jenkins, L. (Ed.), The genetics of language (pp. 117–145). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
van der Lely, H. (2005). Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from grammatical-SLI. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 53–59.
Wilkinson, P., & Patty, D. (1993). The effects of sentence combining on the reading comprehension of fourth grade students. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 104–125.
Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 40Number 2April 2009
Pages: 184-191

History

  • Received: Apr 19, 2008
  • Accepted: Jul 20, 2008
  • Published in issue: Apr 1, 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. reading comprehension
  2. sentence comprehension
  3. syntax
  4. syntactic complexity
  5. specific language impairment

Authors

Affiliations

Cheryl M. Scott [email protected]
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Notes

Contact author: Cheryl M. Scott, 1653 West Congress Parkway, Suite 203 Senn, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Reading Comprehension and Linguistic Abilities of Children with and without Specific Learning Difficulties: Theoretical and Educational Implications, Education Sciences, 10.3390/educsci14080884, 14, 8, (884), (2024).
  • Eye tracking sentences in language education, Diacrítica, 10.21814/diacritica.739, 36, 1, (2023).
  • Disfluency attenuates the reception of pseudoprofound and postmodernist bullshit, Thinking & Reasoning, 10.1080/13546783.2023.2284406, 30, 4, (579-611), (2023).
  • Enhancing Syntactic Knowledge in School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: The Promise of Syntactic Priming, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00079, 33, 2, (580-597), (2023).
  • Sentences Are Key: Helping School-Age Children and Adolescents Build Sentence Skills Needed for Real Language, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00038, 33, 2, (564-579), (2023).
  • Language Ability Accounts for Ethnic Difference in Mathematics Achievement, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929719, 13, (2022).
  • Does the Use of Complex Sentences Differentiate Between Bilinguals With and Without DLD? Evidence From Conversation and Narrative Tasks, Frontiers in Education, 10.3389/feduc.2021.804088, 6, (2022).
  • Cognitive and linguistic effects of narrative-based language intervention in children with Developmental Language Disorder, Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 10.1177/23969415211015867, 6, (2021).
  • Unraveling Adolescent Language & Reading Comprehension: The Monster’s Data, Scientific Studies of Reading, 10.1080/10888438.2021.1989437, 26, 4, (305-326), (2021).
  • Empirical Insights into College Students’ Academic Reading Comprehension in the United States, Journal of College Reading and Learning, 10.1080/10790195.2020.1867669, 51, 3, (225-245), (2021).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share