ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
No AccessLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in SchoolsResearch Article1 Apr 2010

What Makes a Caseload (Un)Manageable? School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists Speak

    https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0090)

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Large caseload sizes and a shortage of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are ongoing concerns in the field of speech and language. This study was conducted to identify current mean caseload size for school-based SLPs, a threshold at which caseload size begins to be perceived as unmanageable, and variables contributing to school-based SLPs' feelings of caseload manageability.

    Method

    Approximately 2,000 public-school-based SLPs from across the country were solicited to participate in an online, Web-based survey between April and May of 2007. Of those SLPs who were contacted, 634 full-time SLPs from 49 states completed the survey. The data were evaluated using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

    Results

    The mean caseload size for SLPs in this study was 49 students. At the caseload range of 41–50 students, approximately 60% of the SLPs perceived their caseload size as unmanageable. Logistic regression revealed caseload size, years of experience, and extent of collaboration as significant predictors of an SLP’s likelihood of feeling that his or her caseload size is manageable.

    Conclusions

    Caseload size continues to be an area of concern for school-based SLPs, and efforts to address this problem must continue in order to prevent long-term struggles with SLPs' dissatisfaction, shortages, and turnover. Policy, research, and clinical implications are discussed.

    REFERENCES

    • Achilles, J., Yates, R. R., & Freese, J. M. (1991). Perspectives from the field: Collaborative consultation in the speech and language program of the Dallas Independent School District.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 154–155.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991). A model for collaborative service delivery for students with language-learning disorders in public schools. Available from www.asha.org/policy
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1993). Guidelines for caseload size and speech-language service delivery in the schools.Asha, 35(Suppl. 10), 33–39.
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language Hearing Association (1995, July). Beyond inclusion: Making the system work for children with a language learning disability.Division 1 Newsletter, Language Learning and Education, 2(1)
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2000). 2000 Schools Survey special report: Caseload trends. Rockville, MD: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2001). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to reading and writing in children and adolescents. Rockville, MD: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). A workload analysis approach for establishing speech-language caseload standards in the schools: Technical report. Rockville, MD: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). 2004 Schools Survey special report: Caseload trends. Rockville, MD: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2006a). Personnel issues in education: Recruitment and retention of qualified speech-language pathologists in the public schools. Rockville, MD: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2006b). 2006 Schools Survey special report: Caseload trends. Rockville, MD: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008). 2008 Schools Survey report: Caseload characteristics trends. Rockville, MD: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • Beck, A. R., & Dennis, M. (1997). Speech-language pathologists' and teachers' perceptions of classroom-based interventions.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 146–153.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Bello, J. (1995, August). Omnibus survey: Practice issues for speech-language pathologists.Asha, 37(9)29.
      Google Scholar
    • Blood, G. W., Ridenour, J. S., Thomas, E. A., Qualls, C. D., & Hammer, C. S. (2002). Predicting job satisfaction among speech-language pathologists working in public schools.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 282–290.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Butler, K., Nelson, N., Roth, F., & Paul, D. (2006). Partnerships for literacy: Principles and practices. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
      Google Scholar
    • Carlson, E., Brauen, M., Klein, S., Schroll, K., & Willig, S. (2002). SPeNSE (Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education): Key findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of EducationRetrieved from http://www.spense.org/
      Google Scholar
    • Chiang, B., & Rylance, B. (2000). Wisconsin speech-language pathologists' caseloads: Reality and repercussions (Wisconsin Educators' Caseload Efficacy Project, Research Report 4). Oshkosh, WI: University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh.
      Google Scholar
    • Cirrin, F., Bird, A., Biehl, L., Disney, S., Estomin, E., Rudebusch, J., … Whitmire, K. (2003). Speech-language caseloads in the schools: A workload analysis approach to setting caseload standards.Seminars in Speech and Language, 24(3)155–180.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Crowe, E., Deppe, J., & Karr, S. (2008, March25). State, national efforts address personnel shortages.The ASHA Leader, 13(4). 8, 13.
      Google Scholar
    • Dodge, E. P. (2004). Communication skills: The foundation for meaningful group intervention in school-based programs.Topics in Language Disorders, 24(2)141–150.
      Google Scholar
    • Dowden, P., Alarcon, N., Vollan, T., Cumley, G. D., Kuehn, C. M., & Amtmann, D. (2006). Survey of SLP caseloads in Washington State schools: Implications and strategies for action.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 104–117.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ehren, B. J. (2000). Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: Keys to in-classroom speech-language services.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(3)104–117.
      Google Scholar
    • Ehren, B. J., & Ehren, T. C. (2001). New or expanded literacy roles for speech-language pathologists: Making it happen in the schools.Seminars in Speech and Language, 22(3)234–243.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Ehren, B. J., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). The responsiveness to intervention approach and language impairment.Topics in Language Disorders, 25(2)120–131.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Ehren, B. J., & Whitmire, K. A. (2005). Leadership opportunities in the context of responsiveness to intervention activities.Topics in Language Disorders, 25(2)168–179.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Elksnin, L. K. (1997). Collaborative speech and language services for students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4)414–426.
      Google Scholar
    • Elksnin, L. K., & Capilouto, G. J. (1994). Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of integrated service delivery in school settings.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 25, 258–267.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Giangreco, M. F., Prelock, P. A., Reid, R. R., Dennis, R. E., & Edelman, S. W. (2000). Role of related services personnel in inclusive schools.In R. A. Villa, & J. S. Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (pp. 360–388). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
      Google Scholar
    • Hadley, P. A., Simmerman, A., Long, M., & Luna, M. (2000). Facilitating language development for inner-city children: Experimental evaluation of a collaborative, classroom-based intervention.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 280–295.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Huang, R. J., Hopkins, J., & Nippold, M. A. (1997). Satisfaction with standardized language testing: A survey of speech-language pathologists.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 12–29.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
      Google Scholar
    • Katz, L. A., Fallon, K. A., Blenkarn, K., John, J., Olszewski, K., Smith, M., & Maag, A. (2007, November). Written language and the school-based speech-language pathologist: A national survey. Poster session presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Conference, Boston, MA.
      Google Scholar
    • Katz, L. A., Fallon, K. A., & Maag, A. (2008, November). Collaborative practices in literacy: Results from a national survey study of school-based speech-language pathologists. Seminar presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Conference, Boston, MA.
      Google Scholar
    • Magnotta, O. H. (1991). Looking beyond tradition.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 150–151.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Moore-Brown, B. J. (1991). Moving in the direction of change: Thoughts for administrators and speech-language pathologists.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 148–149.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Nelson, N., Catts, H., Ehren, B., Roth, F., Scott, C., & Staskowski, M. (2001). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to reading and writing in children and adolescents.The ASHA Leader, 6, 17–22.
      Google Scholar
    • Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2006). Partnerships for literacy in a writing lab approach.Topics in Language Disorders, 26(1)55–69.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Peters-Johnson, C. (1996). Action: School services.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 185–186.
      Google Scholar
    • Peters-Johnson, C. (1998). Action: School services.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 120–126.
      Google Scholar
    • Pezzei, C., & Oratio, A. R. (1991). A multivariate analysis of the job satisfaction of public school speech-language pathologists.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 139–146.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Prelock, P. A. (2000). Multiple perspectives for determining the roles of speech-language pathologists in inclusionary classrooms.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 213–218.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Shaughnessy, A., & Sanger, D. (2005). Kindergarten teachers' perceptions of language and literacy development, speech-language pathologists, and language interventions.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 26(2)67–84.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Snap Survey Software.n.d.). [Computer software].Bristol, UK: Mercator Research Group.
      Google Scholar
    • Spector, P. E. (1996). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
      Google Scholar
    • Staskowski, M., & Zagaiski, K. (2003). Reaching for the stars: SLPs shine on literacy teams.Seminars in Speech and Language, 24(3)199–213.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., Nevin, A. I., & Malgeri, C. (1996). Instilling collaboration for inclusive schooling as a way of doing business in public schools.Remedial and Special Education, 17, 161–181.
      Google Scholar
    • Whitmire, K. (2002). The evolution of school-based speech-language services: A half a century of change and a new century of practice.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 23(2)68–76.
      Google Scholar

    Additional Resources