Purpose

The relations of phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness and vocabulary to word reading and spelling were examined for 304 first-grade children who were receiving differentiated instruction in a Response to Intervention (RtI) model of instruction.

Method

First-grade children were assessed on their phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness; expressive vocabulary; word reading; and spelling. Year-end word reading and spelling were outcome variables, and phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness; expressive vocabulary; and RtI status (Tiers 1, 2, & 3) were predictor variables.

Results

The 3 linguistic awareness skills were unique predictors of word reading, and phonological and orthographic awareness were unique predictors of spelling. The contributions that these linguistic awareness skills and vocabulary made to word reading and spelling did not differ by children's RtI tier status.

Conclusion

These results, in conjunction with previous studies, suggest that even beginning readers and spellers draw on multiple linguistic awareness skills for their word reading and spelling regardless of their level of literacy abilities. Educational implications are discussed.

References

  • Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., Meadows, J., & Li, Z. (2011). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: Findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial.The Elementary School Journal, 111, 535–560.
  • Apel, K. (2011). What is orthographic knowledge?.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 592–603.
  • Apel, K., & Apel, L. (2011). Identifying intraindividual differences in students' written language abilities.Topics in Language Disorders, 31, 54–72.
  • Apel, K., & Masterson, J. J. (2001). Theory-guided spelling assessment and intervention: A case study.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 182–195.
  • Apel, K., Masterson, J. J., & Brimo, D. (2011). Spelling assessment and intervention: A multiple linguistic approach to improving literacy outcomes.In A. G. Kamhi, & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 226–243). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., Brimo, D., & Perrin, N. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1283–1305.
  • Arnold, D. H., & Doctoroff, G. L. (2003). The early education of socioeconomically disadvantaged children.Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 517–545.
  • Arriaga, R. I., Fenson, L., Cronan, T., & Pethick, S. J. (1998). Scores on the MacArthur Communication Developmental Inventory of children from low- and middle-income families.Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 209–223.
  • Bear, D., & Templeton, S. (1998). Explorations in developmental spelling: Foundations for learning and teaching phonics, spelling, and vocabulary.Reading Teacher, 52, 222–243.
  • Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., Hirshberg, J., … Treadway, G. H. (2002). Open court reading. Columbus, OH: SRA McGraw-Hill.
  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163.
  • Bird, J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Freeman, N. H. (1995). Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expressive phonological impairments.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 446–462.
  • Bourassa, D., & Treiman, R. (2009). Linguistic foundationzs of spelling development.In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 182–192). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Bourassa, D. C., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children.Memory & Cognition, 34, 703–714.
  • Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development.Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.
  • Burgess, S. R., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and prereading abilities: Evidence from a pre-school sample.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 117–141.
  • Caravolas, M., Kessler, B., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Effects of orthographic consistency, frequency, and letter knowledge on children's vowel spelling development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 307–321.
  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement.In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Carlisle, J., & Nomanbhoy, D. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders.Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.
  • Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study.Reading and Writing, 12, 303–335.
  • Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 296–300.
  • Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?.Cognition, 91, 77–111.
  • Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. E. (2005). What young children do and do not know about the spelling of inflections and derivations.Developmental Science, 8, 583–594.
  • Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., & Casselman-Bell, M. (2009). How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes?.Reading Psychology, 30, 301–318.
  • Duff, F. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). The role of children's phonological and semantic knowledge in learning to read words.Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 504–525.
  • Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers.Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 135–163.
  • Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
  • Hecht, S. A., & Close, L. (2002). Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kindergartners.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 93–115.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, §118 Stat. 26472004.
  • Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework.School Psychology Review, 6, 582–600.
  • Kaplan, D., & Walpole, S. (2005). A stage-sequential model of reading transitions: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 551–563.
  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis.Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, 111/112, 147–160.
  • Katzir, T., Kim, Y.-S., Wolf, M., O'Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts.Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 51–82.
  • Kim, Y.-S. (2010). Componential skills of spelling in Korean.Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 137–158.
  • Kim, Y.-S. (2011). Considering linguistic and orthographic features in early literacy acquisition: Evidence from Korean.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 177–189.
  • Larsen, S. C., Hammill, D. D., & Moats, L. C. (1999). Test of Written Spelling—Fourth Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., Anthony, J. L., & Barker, T. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in two- to five-year-old children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 294–311.
  • Lonigan, C. J., Schatschneider, C., & Westberg, L. (2009). Impact of code-focused interventions on young children's early literacy skills.National Early Literacy PanelDeveloping early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (pp. 107–151). Jessup, MD: National Literacy InstituteRetrieved from http://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf
  • Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.
  • Moats, L. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle school students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.
  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vaughan, K., & Vermeulen, K. (2003). Relationship Of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second graders and at-risk fourth grade writers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 730–742.
  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading.Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Author.
  • National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Ortiz, M., Folsom, J. S., Al Otaiba, S., Gruelich, L., Thomas-Tate, S., & Connor, C. M. (2012). Predicting first grade reading outcomes from kindergarten language and literacy skills: Examining the contributions of dialect and morpho-syntactic skills within a component model of reading.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 406–417.
  • Oullette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566.
  • Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2008). Pathways to literacy: A study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read.Child Development, 79, 899–913.
  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
  • Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some but not all reading skills.Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257.
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice, and change in strategy use.Child Development, 70, 332–348.
  • Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113.
  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Applying Hamlet's question to the ethical conduct of research: a conceptual addendum.American Psychologist, 39, 561–563.
  • Schlagal, B. (2001). Traditional, developmental, and structural language approaches to spelling: Review and recommendations.Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 147–176.
  • Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study.Child Development, 73, 445–460.
  • Share, D. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography.Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.
  • Seidenberg, M. S. (2005). Connectionist models of word reading.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 238–242.
  • Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Speece, D. L., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 180, 147–156.
  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
  • Walker, J., & Hauerwas, L. B. (2006). Development of phonological, morphological, and orthographic knowledge in young spellers: The case of inflected verbs.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 819–843.
  • Wolter, J. A., Wood, K. A., & D'zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 286–298.
  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement—Third Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
  • Zirkel, P., & Thomas, L. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot.Teaching Exceptional Children, 42, 56–63.

Additional Resources