No access
Review Article
July 2010

Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Different Service Delivery Models on Communication Outcomes for Elementary School–Age Children

Publication: Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 41, Number 3
Pages 233-264

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this investigation was to conduct an evidence-based systematic review (EBSR) of peer-reviewed articles from the last 30 years about the effect of different service delivery models on speech-language intervention outcomes for elementary school–age students.

Method

A computer search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies that addressed any of 16 research questions. Structured review procedures were used to select and evaluate data-based studies that used experimental designs of the following types: randomized clinical trial, nonrandomized comparison study, and single-subject design study.

Results

The EBSR revealed a total of 5 studies that met the review criteria and addressed questions of the effectiveness of pullout, classroom-based, and indirect–consultative service delivery models with elementary school–age children. Some evidence suggests that classroom-based direct services are at least as effective as pullout intervention for some intervention goals, and that highly trained speech-language pathology assistants, using manuals prepared by speech-language pathologists to guide intervention, can provide effective services for some children with language problems.

Conclusion

Lacking adequate research-based evidence, clinicians must rely on reason-based practice and their own data until more data become available concerning which service delivery models are most effective. Recommendations are made for an expanded research agenda.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

REFERENCES

Achilles, J., Yates, R., & Freese, J. (1991). Perspectives from the field: Collaborative consultation in the speech and language program of the Dallas Independent School District. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 154–155.
Alpert, C., & Kaiser, A. (1992). Training parents as milieu language teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 16(1)31–52.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1990). A model of collaborative service delivery for students with language-learning disorders in the public schools. Available at www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991). Providing appropriate education for students with learning disabilities in regular education classrooms. Available at www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1996). Inclusive practices for children and youths with communication disorders. Available at www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). A workload analysis approach for establishing speech-language caseload standards in the schools: Guidelines and technical report. Rockville, MD: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Report of the Joint Coordinating Committee on Evidence-Based Practices. Available at www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: Position statement and technical report. Available at www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008). 2008 Schools Survey: Caseload characteristics. Rockville, MD: Author.
Barratt, J., Littlejohns, P., & Thompson, J. (1992). Trial of intensive compared with weekly speech therapy in preschool children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 67, 106–108.
Baxendale, J., & Hesketh, A. (2003). Comparison of the effectiveness of the Hanen Parent Programme and traditional clinic therapy. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(4)397–415.
Beck, A., & Dennis, M. (1997). Speech-language pathologists' and teachers' perceptions of classroom-based interventions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 146–153.
Bennett, R. (1988). Evaluating the effectiveness of alternate educational delivery systems. In Graden, J., Zins, J., & Curtis, M. (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 276–301). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Bernhardt, B., Smith, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Language intervention with a “family-centered, collaborative, transdisciplinary, integrated” approach: An example. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 8(3)265–284.
Bland, L., & Prelock, P. (1995). Effects of collaboration on language performance. Journal of Children’s Communication Development, 17(2)31–38.
Boehm, A. (1986). Boehm Test of Basic Concepts (Rev. ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (2001). The Picture Exchange Communication System. Behavior Modification, 25(5)725–744.
Borsch, J., & Oaks, R. (1992). Implementing collaborative consultation: Effective collaboration at Central Elementary School. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 367–368.
Boyle, J., McCartney, E., Forbes, J., & O’Hare, A. (2007). A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of direct versus indirect and individual versus group modes of speech and language therapy for children with primary language impairment. Health Technology Assessment, 11(25)1–158.
Brandel, D. (1992). Implementing collaborative consultation: Collaboration—Full steam ahead with no prior experience. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 369–370.
Broen, P., & Westman, M. (1990). Project parent: A preschool speech program implemented through parents. Journal of Speech Hearing Disorders, 55(3)495–502.
Buttrill, J., Niizawa, J., Biemer, C., Takahasbi, C., & Hearn, S. (1989). Serving the language-learning disabled adolescent: A strategies-based model. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 20, 185–204.
Charlop, C., & Carpenter, M. (2000). Modified incidental teaching sessions: A procedure for parents to increase spontaneous speech in their children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(2)98–112.
Christensen, S., & Luckett, C. (1990). Getting into the classroom and making it work! Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21, 110–113.
Cirrin, F., & Gillam, R. (2008). Language intervention practices for school-age children with spoken language disorders: A systematic review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, S110–S137.
Cirrin, F., & Penner, S. (1995). Classroom-based and consultative service delivery models for language intervention. In Fey, M., Windsor, J., & Warren, S. (Eds.), Language intervention: Preschool through elementary years (pp. 333–362). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Creaghead, N. (1990). Mutual empowerment through collaboration: A new script for an old problem. Best Practices in School Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 109–115.
Damico, J. (1988). The lack of efficacy in language therapy: A case study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 19, 51–66.
Damico, J., & Nye, C. (1990). Collaborative issues in multicultural populations. Best Practices in School Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 127–139.
Despain, A., & Simon, C. (1987). Alternative to failure: A junior high school language development-based curriculum. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 11(1)139–149.
Dodge, E., & Mallard, A. (1992). Social skills training using a collaborative service delivery model. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 130–135.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale: Second Edition (BPVSII). Windsor, England: Nfer-Nelson.
Dyer, K., Williams, L., & Luce, S. (1991). Training teachers to use naturalistic communication strategies in classrooms for students with autism and other severe handicaps. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 313–321.
Ehren, B. (2000). Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: Keys to in-classroom speech-language services. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 219–229.
Eiserman, W. (1995). Parent and professional roles in early intervention: A longitudinal comparison of the effects of two intervention configurations. Journal of Special Education, 29(1)20–44.
Eiserman, W., Weber, C., & McCoun, M. (1992). Two alternative program models for serving speech-disordered preschoolers: A second year follow-up. Journal of Communication Disorders, 25(2–3), 77–106.
Elder, J. (1995). In-home communication intervention training for parents of multiply handicapped children. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 9(1)71–95.
Elksnin, L., & Capilouto, G. (1994). Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of integrated service delivery in school settings. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 25, 258–267.
Ellis, L., Schlaudecker, C., & Regimbal, C. (1995). Effectiveness of a collaborative consultation approach to basic concept instruction with kindergarten children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 69–74.
Farber, J., & Klein, E. (1999). Classroom-based assessment of a collaborative intervention program with kindergarten and first-grade students. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 83–91.
The Federal Register1999). Involvement and progress of each child with a disability in the general curriculum. U. S. Department of Education, 64(48)12471.
Ferguson, M. (1992). Implementing collaborative consultation: The transition to collaborative teaching. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 371–372.
Frassinelli, L., Superior, K., & Meyers, J. (1983). A consultation model for speech and language intervention. Asha, 25, 25–30.
Giangreco, M. (2000). Related services research for students with low-incidence disabilities: Implications for speech-language pathologists in inclusive classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 230–239.
Gibbard, D., Coglan, L., & MacDonald, J. (2004). Cost-effectiveness analysis of current practice and parent intervention for children under 3 years presenting with expressive language delay. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(2)229–244.
Gillam, S., & Gillam, R. (2006). Making evidence-based decisions about child language intervention in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 304–315.
Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., & Clements-Baartman, J. (1998). Vocabulary intervention for children with Down syndrome: Parent training using focused stimulation. Infant Toddler Intervention: The Transdisciplinary Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(2)109–125.
Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., & Greenberg, J. (2004). The effects of verbal support strategies on small-group peer interactions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 254–268.
Gruenewald, L., & Pollak, S. (1990). Language interaction in curriculum and instruction. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Hadley, P., Simmerman, A., Long, M., & Luna, M. (2000). Facilitating language development for inner-city children: Experimental evaluation of a collaborative, classroom-based intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 280–295.
Handleman, J., & Harris, S. (1983). A comparison of one-to-one versus couplet instruction with autistic children. Behavioral Disorders, 9(1)22–26.
Hemmeter, M., & Kaiser, A. (1994). Enhanced milieu teaching: Effects of parent-implemented language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 18(3)269–289.
Holzhauser-Peters, L., & Husemann, D. (1988). Alternative service delivery models for more efficient and effective treatment programs. Clinical Connection, 3, 16–18.
Howlin, P. (1981). The results of a home-based language training programme with autistic children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 16(2)73–88.
Howlin, P., Gordon, R., Pasco, G., Wade, A., & Charman, T. (2007). The effectiveness of Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) training for teachers of children with autism: A pragmatic, group randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(5)473–481.
Iacono, T., Chan, J., & Waring, R. (1998). Efficacy of a parent-implemented early language intervention based on collaborative consultation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33(3)281–303.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004 (IDEA), Pub. L. No. 108-446. (2004).
Jacoby, G., Lee, L., Kummer, A., Levin, L., & Creaghead, N. (2002). The number of individual treatment units necessary to facilitate functional communication improvements in the speech and language of young children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 370–380.
Johnston, J. (2005). Re: Law, Garrett, and Nye (2004a). “The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: A meta-analysis.”. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1114–1117.
Kaiser, A. (1995). Preparing parent trainers: An experimental analysis of effects on trainers, parents, and children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(4)385–414.
Kaiser, A., Hancock, T., & Nietfeld, J. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Early Education and Development, 11(4)423–446.
Kaiser, A., Hemmeter, M., & Ostrosky, M. (1996). The effects of teaching parents to use responsive interaction strategies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 375–406.
Kaufman, S., Prelock, P., Weiler, E., Creaghead, N., & Donnelly, C. (1994). Metapragmatic awareness of explanation adequacy: Developing skills for academic success from a collaborative communication skills unit. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 25, 174–180.
Kavale, K. (2002). Mainstreaming to full inclusion: From orthogenesis to pathogenesis of an idea. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 49(2)201–214.
Kohl, F., Wilcox, B., & Karlan, G. (1978). Effects of training conditions on the generalization of manual signs with moderately handicapped students. Education & Training of the Mentally Retarded, 13(3)327–335.
Laski, K., Charlop, M., & Schreibman, L. (1988). Training parents to use the natural language paradigm to increase their autistic children’s speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21(4)391–400.
Law, J., Garrett, Z., & Nye, C. (2004). The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 924–943.
Law, J., Lindsay, G., Peacey, N., Gascoigne, M., Soloff, N., Radford, J., & Band, S. (2002). Consultation as a model for providing speech and language therapy in schools: A panacea or one step too far? Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 18, 145–163.
Lederer, S. (2001). Efficacy of parent–child language group intervention for late-talking toddlers. Infant–Toddler Intervention, 11(3/4)223–235.
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Lovaas, O. (1977). The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York, NY: Wiley.
MacDonald, J., & Gillette, Y. (1989). ECO Scales manual. San Antonio, TX: Special Press.
Magnotta, O. (1991). Looking beyond tradition. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 150–151.
Marvin, C. (1987). Consultation services: Changing roles for SLPs. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 11(1)1–15.
Marvin, C. (1990). Problems in school-based speech-language consultation and collaborative services: Defining the terms and improving the process. Best Practices in School Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 37–47.
McCauley, R., & Fey, M. (2006). Treatment of language disorders in children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
McCormick, L., Frome Loeb, D., & Schiefelbusch, R. (2003). Supporting children with communication difficulties in inclusive settings (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
McGinty, A., & Justice, L. (2006). Classroom-based versus pullout interventions: A review of the experimental evidence. EBP Briefs, 1(1)3–25.
Miller, J., & Chapman, R. (1986). SALT: Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin – Madison, Waisman Center, Language Analysis Laboratory.
Mobayed, K., Collins, B., Strangis, D., Schuster, J., & Hemmeter, M. (2000). Teaching parents to employ mand-model procedures to teach their children requesting. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(3)165–179.
Montgomery, J. (1992). Implementing collaborative consultation: Perspectives from the field—Language, speech and hearing services in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 363–364.
Moore-Brown, B. (1991). Moving in the direction of change: Thoughts for administrators and speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 148–149.
Moore-Brown, B., & Montgomery, J. (2001). Expanded and specialized services. In Moore-Brown, B., & Montgomery, J. (Eds.), Making a difference for America’s children: Speech-language pathologists in public schools (pp. 205–238). Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
Mullen, R. (2007, March 6). The state of the evidence: ASHA develops levels of evidence for communication sciences and disorders. The ASHA Leader. 8–25.
Nelson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based language assessment and intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 20, 170–184.
Nelson, N. (1993). Childhood language disorders in context: Infancy through adolescence. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Nelson, N., Bahr, C., & Van Meter, A. (2004). The writing lab approach to language instruction and intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Norris, J. (1989). Providing language remediation in the classroom: An integrated language-to-reading intervention model. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 20, 205–218.
Norris, J., & Hoffman, P. (1990). Language intervention within naturalistic environments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21, 72–84.
Pepper, J., Weitzman, E., & McDade, A. (2004). Making Hanen happen: It Takes Two to Talk—The Hanen Program for Parents. Leader’s guide for certified speech-language pathologists. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Hanen Centre.
Pierce, K., & Schreibman, L. (1997). Using peer trainers to promote social behavior in autism: Are they effective at enhancing multiple social modalities? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12(4)207–218.
Prelock, P. (2000). An intervention focus for inclusionary practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 213–218.
Prelock, P., Miller, B., & Reed, N. (1995). Collaborative partnerships in a language in the classroom program. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 286–292.
Pring, T. (2004). Ask a silly question: Two decades of troublesome trials. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(3)285–302.
Rafferty, Y., Piscitelli, V., & Boettcher, C. (2003). The impact of inclusion on language development and social competence among preschoolers with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(4)467–479.
Reynell, J. (1969). Reynell Developmental Language Scales. Windsor, England: N.F.E.R.
Roberts, J., Prizant, B., & McWilliam, R. (1995). Out-of-class versus in-class service delivery in language intervention: Effects on communication interactions with young children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 87–94.
Rocha, M., Schreibman, L., & Stahmer, A. (2007). Effectiveness of training parents to teach joint attention in children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 29(2)154–173.
Roller, E., Rodriquez, T., Warner, J., & Lindahl, P. (1992). Implementing collaborative consultation: Integration of self-contained children with severe speech-language needs into the regular education classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 365–366.
Ruscello, D., Cartwright, L., Haines, K., & Shuster, L. (1993). The use of different service delivery models for children with phonological disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 26(3)193–203.
Russell, S., & Kaderavek, J. (1993). Alternative models for collaboration. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 24, 76–78.
Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R., & Richardson, W. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
Schlosser, R., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1(3)138–150.
Schuele, M., & Justice, L. (2006, August 15). The importance of effect sizes in the interpretation of research. The ASHA Leader. 14–26.
Schwartz, I., Anderson, S., & Halle, J. (1989). Training teachers to use naturalistic time delay: Effects on teacher behavior and on the language use of students. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14(1)48–57.
Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and implications. Exceptionality, 9, 227–244.
Seifert, H., & Schwarz, I. (1991). Treatment effectiveness of large group basic concept instruction with Head Start students. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22(2)60–64.
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (1987). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—Revised (CELF–R). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (2000). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—Third Edition UK. London, England: The Psychological Corporation.
Seung, H., Ashwell, S., Elder, J., & Valcante, G. (2006). Verbal communication outcomes in children with autism after in-home father training. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(2)139–150.
Silliman, E., & Wilkinson, L. (1991). Communicating for learning: Classroom observation and collaboration. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Silliman, E., Wilkinson, L., Belkin, A., & Hoffman, L. (1991). Facilitating collaboration through coparticipation. In Silliman, E., & Wilkinson, L. (Eds.), Communicating for learning: Classroom observation and collaboration (pp. 77–108). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Simon, C. (1987). Out of the broom closet and into the classroom: The emerging SLP. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 11(1)41–66.
Simon, C., & Myrold-Gunyuz, P. (1990). Into the classroom: The SLP in the collaborative role. Tuscon, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
Smith, A., & Camarata, S. (1999). Using teacher-implemented instruction to increase language intelligibility of children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(3)141–151.
Stanovich, P., & Stanovich, K. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular and instructional decisions. Retrieved from www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/html/stanovich/
Throneburg, R., Calvert, L., Sturm, J., Paramboukas, A., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of service delivery models: Effects on curricular vocabulary skills in the school setting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9(1)10–20.
Ukrainetz, T. (2006). Contextualized language intervention: Scaffolding PreK–12 literacy achievement. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
Valdez, F., & Montgomery, J. (1997). Outcomes from two treatment approaches for children with communication disorders in Head Start. Journal of Children’s Communication Development, 18, 65–71.
Warren, S., Fey, M., & Yoder, P. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77.
Westby, C., Watson, S., & Murphy, M. (1994). The vision of full inclusion. Don’t exclude kids by including them. Journal of Children’s Communication Development, 16(1)13–22.
Wilcox, M., Kouri, T., & Caswell, S. (1991). Early language intervention: A comparison of classroom and individual treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1(1)49–62.
Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Pond, R. (1993). Preschool Language Scale—3: Spanish Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Volume 41Number 3July 2010
Pages: 233-264

History

  • Received: Dec 9, 2008
  • Revised: Mar 3, 2009
  • Accepted: Apr 22, 2009
  • Published in issue: Jul 1, 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. service delivery models
  2. pullout
  3. classroom based
  4. indirect–consultative
  5. evidence-based practice

Authors

Affiliations

Frank M. Cirrin [email protected]
Tracy L. Schooling
National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders, Rockville, MD
Nickola W. Nelson
Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo
Sylvia F. Diehl
University of South Florida, Tampa
Perry F. Flynn
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Raleigh
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Maureen Staskowski
Macomb Intermediate School District, Clinton Township, MI
T. Zoann Torrey
Kansas State Department of Education (Retired), Topeka
Deborah F. Adamczyk
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD

Notes

Contact author: Frank M. Cirrin, Minneapolis Public Schools/Special Education, 425 5th Street, NE, Minneapolis, MN 55413. E-mail: [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • A Systematic Literature Review on School-Based Speech-Language Pathology Collaboration Research, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-24-00012, 56, 1, (234-251), (2025).
  • Neurorehabilitation and specific therapies, Capute and Accardo' s Neurodevelopmental Disabilities in Infancy and Childhood, 10.1016/B978-0-12-824060-1.00016-X, (799-858), (2025).
  • Exploring the valued outcomes of school-based speech-language therapy services: a sequential iterative design, Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 10.3389/fresc.2024.1290800, 5, (2024).
  • Core outcomes for speech-language services in Ontario schools: a group concept mapping study and guiding framework, BMC Health Services Research, 10.1186/s12913-024-10821-7, 24, 1, (2024).
  • The Perspectives of Students Involved in a Classroom-Based Oral Language Intervention in their first Formal year of Schooling, Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1080/22087168.2019.12370256, 21, 2, (94-99), (2024).
  • A survey of speech-language pathology service delivery in Australian schools, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1080/17549507.2024.2404035, (1-13), (2024).
  • A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Caregivers' Experiences With Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Their Collaboration With School Professionals, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00117, 55, 2, (607-627), (2024).
  • Group Size: An Active Ingredient of School-Based Language Therapy, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00047, 55, 3, (781-802), (2024).
  • Returning to School After Pediatric Stroke, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.001, 105, 1, (185-189), (2024).
  • Three-Year Program Evaluation of a University–Public School Collaborative Partnership, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2023_LSHSS-23-00033, 55, 1, (18-33), (2023).
  • See more

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share