No access
Review Article
May 2013

Evidence-Based Clinical Voice Assessment: A Systematic Review

Publication: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 22, Number 2
Pages 212-226

Abstract

Purpose

To determine what research evidence exists to support the use of voice measures in the clinical assessment of patients with voice disorders.

Method

The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders staff searched 29 databases for peer-reviewed English-language articles between January 1930 and April 2009 that included key words pertaining to objective and subjective voice measures, voice disorders, and diagnostic accuracy. The identified articles were systematically assessed by an ASHA-appointed committee employing a modification of the critical appraisal of diagnostic evidence rating system.

Results

One hundred articles met the search criteria. The majority of studies investigated acoustic measures (60%) and focused on how well a test method identified the presence or absence of a voice disorder (78%). Only 17 of the 100 articles were judged to contain adequate evidence for the measures studied to be formally considered for inclusion in clinical voice assessment.

Conclusion

Results provide evidence for selected acoustic, laryngeal imaging–based, auditory–perceptual, functional, and aerodynamic measures to be used as effective components in a clinical voice evaluation. However, there is clearly a pressing need for further high-quality research to produce sufficient evidence on which to recommend a comprehensive set of methods for a standard clinical voice evaluation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association 2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ((4th ed., text revision)). Arlington, VA: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1998). The roles of otolaryngologists and speech-language pathologists in the performance and interpretation of strobovideolaryngoscopy [Relevant Paper] Available from www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2004). Preferred practice patterns for the profession of speech-language pathology [Preferred Practice Pattern] Available from www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2005). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [Position Statement] Available from www.asha.org/policy
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2008). Loss to follow-up in early hearing detection and intervention [Technical Report] Available from www.asha.org/policy
Arens, C., Reussner, D., Neubacher, H., Woenckhaus, J., & Glanz, H. (2006). Spectrometric measurement in laryngeal cancer. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 263((11)) 1001–1007.
Behrman, A. (2005). Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients. Journal of Voice, 19, 454–469.
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., & Lijmer, J. G. (2003). The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Clinical Chemistry, 49, 7–18.
Cammarota, G., Galli, J., Agostino, S. l., De Corso, E., Rigante, M., Cianci, R., & Gasbarrini, G. (2006). Accuracy of laryngeal examination during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for premalignancy screening: Prospective study in patients with and without reflux symptoms. Endoscopy, 38((4)) 376–381.
Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 223–241.
Dejonckere, P. H., Bradley, P., Clemente, P., Cornut, G., Crevier-Buchman, L., Friedrich, G., & Woisard, V. (2001). A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 258, 77–82.
Dice, G., & Shearer, W. M. (1973). Clinician's accuracy in detecting vocal nodules. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 4, 142–144.
Dollaghan, C. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: What do we know, and when do we know it? Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 391–400.
Dollaghan, C. A. (2007). The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Eadie, T. L., & Baylor, C. R. (2006). The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice. Journal of Voice, 20, 527–544.
Eadie, T. L., & Doyle, P. C. (2005). Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. Journal of Voice: Official Journal of the Voice Foundation, 19((1)) 1–14.
Gerratt, B. R., & Kreiman, J. (2001). Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2560–2566.
Godino-Llorente, J. I., & Gomez-Vilda, P. (2004). Automatic detection of voice impairments by means of short-term cepstral parameters and neural network based detectors. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51((2)) 380–384.
Hadjitodorov, S., Boyanov, B., & Teston, B. (2000). Laryngeal pathology detection by means of class-specific neural maps. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 4((1)) 68–73.
Hillman, R. E., Montgomery, W. W., & Zeitels, S. M. (1997). Appropriate use of objective measures of vocal function in the multidisciplinary management of voice disorders. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 5, 172–175.
Jacobson, B. H., Johnson, A., Grywalski, C., Silbergleit, A., Jacobson, G., Benninger, M. S., & Newman, C. W. (1997). The voice handicap index (VHI): Development and validation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 66–70.
Jiang, J., & Stern, J. (2004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of aerodynamic parameters obtained by airflow interruption: A preliminary report. The Annals Of Otology, Rhinology, And Laryngology, 113((12)) 961–966.
Kempster, G. B., Gerratt, B. R., Verdolini Abbott, K., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., & Hillman, R. E. (2009). Consensus auditory–perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 124–132.
Little, M. A., McSharry, P. E., Roberts, S. J., Costello, D. A., & Moroz, I. M. (2007). Exploiting nonlinear recurrence and fractal scaling properties for voice disorder detection. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 6, 23
Ma, E., Robertson, J., Radford, C., Vagne, S., El-Halabi, R., & Yiu, E. (2007). Reliability of speaking and maximum voice range measures in screening for dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 21((4)) 397–406.
Mulherin, S. A., & Miller, W. C. (2002). Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137, 598–602.
Parsa, V., & Jamieson, D. G. (2000). Identification of pathological voices using glottal noise measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 469–485.
Parsa, V., & Jamieson, D. G. (2001). Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: Sustained vowels versus continuous speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44((2)) 327–339.
Pribuisiene, R., Uloza, V., & Kupcinskas, L. (2008). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of laryngoscopic signs of reflux laryngitis. Medicina (Kaunas) 44((4)) 280–287.
Rees, C. J., Blalock, P. D., Kemp, S. E., Halum, S. L., & Koufman, J. A. (2007). Differentiation of adductor-type spasmodic dysphonia from muscle tension dysphonia by spectral analysis. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 137((4)) 576–581.
Reid, M., Lachs, M. S., & Feinstein, A. R. (1995). Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research: Getting better but still not good. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 645–651.
Rovirosa, A., Ascaso, C., Abellana, R., Martinez-Celdran, E., Ortega, A., Velasco, M., & Biete, A. (2008). Acoustic voice analysis in different phonetic contexts after larynx radiotherapy for T1 vocal cord carcinoma. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 10((3)) 168–174.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
Sackett, D., Straus, S., Richardson, W., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.
Schwartz, S. R., Cohen, S. M., Dailey, S. H., Rosenfeld, R. M., Deutsch, E. S., Gillespie, M. B., & Patel, M. M. (2009). Clinical practice guideline: Hoarseness (dysphonia). Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 141, S1–S31.
Stojadinovic, A., Henry, L. R., Howard, R. S., Gurevich-Uvena, J., Makashay, M. J., Coppitt, G. L., & Solomon, N. P. (2008). Prospective trial of voice outcomes after thyroidectomy: Evaluation of patient-reported and clinician-determined voice assessments in identifying postthyroidectomy dysphonia. Surgery, 143((6)) 732–742.
Titze, I. R. (1995). Workshop on acoustic voice analysis: Summary statement. Denver, CO: National Center for Voice and Speech.
Turkstra, L. S., Coelho, C., & Ylvisaker, M. (2005). The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive–communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 215–222.
Umapathy, K., Krishnan, S., Parsa, V., & Jamieson, D. G. (2005). Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52((3)) 421–430.
Verdolini, K., Rosen, C., & Branski, R. C. (2006). Classification manual for voice disorders–I, Special Interest Division 3, Voice and Voice Disorders, American Speech-Language Hearing Division. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Verikas, A., Gelzinis, A., Bacauskiene, M., & Uloza, V. (2006). Integrating global and local analysis of color, texture and geometrical information for categorizing laryngeal images. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 20((8)) 1187–1205.
Yorkston, K. M., Spencer, K., Duffy, J., Beukelman, D., Golper, L. A., Miller, R., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Evidence-based medicine and practice guidelines: Application to the field of speech-language pathology. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 243–256.
Zraick, R. I., Kempster, G. B., Connor, N. P., Thibeault, S., Klaben, B. K., Bursac, Z., & Glaze, L. E. (2011). Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory–Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 14–22.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 22Number 2May 2013
Pages: 212-226

History

  • Received: Feb 13, 2012
  • Revised: Jul 19, 2012
  • Accepted: Oct 10, 2012
  • Published in issue: May 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. voice disorders
  2. assessment
  3. technology
  4. diagnostics

Authors

Affiliations

Nelson Roy
University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer
University of California–Davis, Sacramento
Tanya Eadie
University of Washington, Seattle
M. Preeti Sivasankar
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Daryush Mehta [email protected]
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Diane Paul
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD
Robert Hillman
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Notes

Correspondence to Daryush Mehta: [email protected]
Editor: Carol Scheffner Hammer
Associate Editor: Rebecca Leonard

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Quantitative Measurement Methods in Voice Diagnostics, Diagnostic and Treatment in Voice Therapy, 10.1007/978-3-662-70162-1_2, (5-60), (2025).
  • Minimal Clinically Important Differences in CAPE-V Auditory–Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00503, 68, 05, (2275-2290), (2025).
  • Development and Rationale for the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice—Revised (CAPE-Vr), Journal of Voice, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.022, (2025).
  • The Effectiveness of Vocal Health Programs in the Prevention of Voice Disorders in Teachers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Journal of Voice, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.09.017, 39, 2, (564.e1-564.e21), (2025).
  • Comparing the Effects of Sensory Tricks on Voice Symptoms in Patients With Laryngeal Dystonia and Essential Vocal Tremor, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00476, 68, 4, (1654-1675), (2025).
  • Proceso de adaptación y validación de los enunciados del CAPE-V al español y catalán: un modelo para futuras adaptaciones lingüísticas, Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 10.5209/rlog.98432, 15, 1, (e98432), (2025).
  • Can Smartphones Be Used to Record Children's Voices for Acoustic Analysis?, Journal of Voice, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.004, (2025).
  • Speech Range Profile Data in German-Speaking Adults With Vox Phonetography, Journal of Voice, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.002, (2025).
  • Application of Wavelet Analysis and Paraconsistent Feature Extraction in the Classification of Voice Pathologies, Journal of Voice, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.021, (2025).
  • What do the voice-related parameters tell us? The multiparametric index scores, cepstral-based methods, patient-reported outcomes, and durational measurements, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 10.1007/s00405-024-09192-w, (2025).
  • See more

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share