No access
Clinical Focus
May 1992

Evoking [r] Using Visual Feedback

Publication: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 1, Number 3
Pages 29-34

Abstract

An adult who was not able to produce singleton consonantal [r] or any of the r-colored vowels correctly (although he could produce some consonant clusters containing [r]) was enrolled in a treatment program for remediation of these sounds. When, after 17 therapy sessions, he was still unable to produce any of these sounds accurately, a real-time speech spectrograph was introduced to provide visual feedback. Within two sessions, the client was able to produce [] correctly. We were then able to use his production of [] to obtain a correct [r]. The data indicate that this type of biofeedback can be useful for eliciting correct production of [].

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Baker, R. D., & Ryan, B. P. (1971). Programmed conditioning for articulation. Monterey, CA: Monterey Learning Systems.
Bernthal, J. E., & Bankson, N. W. (1988). Articulation and phonological disorders (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cartwright, L. R. (1982). West Virginia University Articulation Screening Test. Unpublished test.
Curtis, J. F., & Hardy, J. C. (1959). A phonetic study of misarticulation of /r/. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 2, 244–257.
Dalston, R. M. (1975). Acoustic characteristics of English /w, r,l/spoken correctly by young children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57, 462–469.
Fuller, G. D. (1980). Projects in biofeedback. San Francisco: Biofeedback Press.
Goda, S. (1970). Articulation therapy and consonant drillbook. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Guilford, A. M., & Hnath-Chisholm, T. (1991). Clinical population: Apraxic children and hearing impaired. In R. B. Mahaffey (Ed.), Methods for using Speechviewer. (Available from IBM Special Needs Systems, 1000 NW Yamato Road, Boca Raton, FL 33432)
Guitar, B. (1975). Reduction of stuttering frequency using analog electro-myographic feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 672–685.
Hanna, R., Wilfling, F., & McNeill, B. (1975). A biofeedback treatment of stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 270–273.
Hardcastle, W. J., Gibbon, F. E., & Jones, W. (1991). Visual display of tongue-palate contact: Electropalatography in the assessment and remediation of speech disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 41–74.
Hoch, L., Golding-Kushner, K., Siegel-Sadewitz, V. L., & Shprintzen, R. J. (1986). Speech therapy. Seminars in Speech and Language, 7, 313–326.
Hoffman, P. R., Schuckers, G. H., & Ratusnik, D. L. (1977). Contextual-coarticulatory inconsistency of /r/misarticulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 631–643.
Janzen, K. L., & Shriberg, L. D. (1977). How to evoke and generalize “R”: A compendium of 36 evocation and phonetic context procedures. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Bookstore.
Kantner, C., & West, R. (1941). Phonetics. New York: Harper & Row.
Kent, R. D. (1982). Contextual facilitation of correct sound production. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 13, 66–76.
Lanyon, R. I., Barrington, C. C., & Newman, A. C. (1976). Modification of stuttering through EMG biofeedback: A preliminary study. Behavior Therapy, 7, 96–103.
Lotz, W. K., & Netsell, R. (1987, November). Treatment of velopharyngeal dysfunction. Short course presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans.
McDonald, E. T. (1964a). A deep test of articulation. Pittsburgh: Stanwix House.
McDonald, E. T. (1964b). Articulation testing and treatment: A sensory motor approach. Pittsburgh: Stanwix House.
Moore, W. H., Dunster, J. R., & Lang, M. K. (1975). The effects of alpha bio-feedback conditioning of stuttered verbal behavior: A case report on some clinical implications. Journal of Biofeedback, 2, 19–28.
Mowrer, D. E. (1975). Helpbook for speech clinicians. Tempe: Arizona State University Bookstore.
Netsell, R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1973). Modification of lip hypertonia in dysarthria using EMG feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 131–140.
Pendergast, K. (1971). Building good speech. Pittsburgh: Stanwix House.
Reisberg, A. (1968). Visual aids for speech correction. American Annals for the Deaf, 113, 178–193.
Ruscello, D. M. (1984). Motor learning as a model for articulation instruction. In Costello, J. (Ed.), Speech disorders in children (pp.129–156). San Diego: College-Hill Press.
Ruscello, D. M., Shuster, L. I., & Sandwisch, A. (1991). Modification of context-specific nasal emission. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 27–32.
Ruscello, D. M., Cartwright, L. R., Haines, K. B., & Shuster, L. I. (1991). Clinical population: Phonological disorders. In R. B. Mahaffey (Ed.), Methods for Using Speechviewer. (Available from IBM Special Needs Systems, 1000 NW Yamato Road, Boca Raton, FL 33432)
St. Louis, K. O., & Ruscello, D. M. (1987). Oral Speech Mechanism Screening-Revised. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Secord, W. (1981). Eliciting sounds: Techniques for clinicians. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Shriberg, L. D. (1975). A response evocation program for /x/. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 92–105.
Shriberg, L. D. (1980). An intervention procedure for children with persistent /r/errors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 11, 102–110.
Stenson, N., Downing, B., Smith, J., & Smith, K. (1991). Clinical population: Foreign accent reduction. In R. B. Mahaffey (Ed.), Methods for Using Speechviewer. (Available from IBM Special Needs Systems, 1000 NW Yamato Road, Boca Raton, FL 33432)
Wolfe, V. I., & Irwin, R. B. (1975). Feedback modification in instrumental conditioning of articulation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 40, 770.
Wood, J. M. (1988). A clinical technique helpful in the elicitation of /x/. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 19, 96–99.
Young, E., & Hawk, S. (1955). Moto-kinesthetic speech training. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 1Number 3May 1992
Pages: 29-34

History

  • Received: Jun 28, 1991
  • Accepted: Feb 3, 1992
  • Published in issue: May 1, 1992

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. articulation disorders
  2. speech disorders
  3. spectrograph

Authors

Affiliations

Linda I. Shuster, PhD
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 805 Allen Hall, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6122
Dennis M. Ruscello
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 805 Allen Hall, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6122
Kimberly D. Smith
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 805 Allen Hall, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6122

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Intervention for residual speech errors in adolescents and adults: A systematised review, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10.1080/02699206.2023.2186765, 38, 3, (203-226), (2023).
  • Preliminary Speech Perception Performance Profiles of School-Age Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech, Speech Sound Disorder, and Typical Development, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00634, 67, 9S, (3480-3494), (2023).
  • Tutorial: Using Visual–Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00142, 32, 1, (18-36), (2023).
  • Telepractice Treatment of Residual Rhotic Errors Using App-Based Biofeedback: A Pilot Study, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084, 53, 2, (256-274), (2022).
  • Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00216, 30, 4, (1819-1845), (2021).
  • Auditory-perceptual acuity in rhotic misarticulation: baseline characteristics and treatment response, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10.1080/02699206.2020.1739749, 35, 1, (19-42), (2020).
  • Computer-Assisted Challenge Point Intervention for Residual Speech Errors, Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00191, 6, 1, (214-229), (2020).
  • Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/1.5089218, 145, 2, (805-817), (2019).
  • Utilization of the Speech Spectrograph in the Study of Disordered Speech and Language, Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorders, 10.1044/ssod11.1.4, 11, 1, (4-5), (2018).
  • Interview with Adele Miccio on Emergent Phonology in Young Children: Bridging Research to Practice, Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 10.1044/lle6.1.41, 6, 1, (41-45), (2018).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share