No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyResearch Article1 Dec 2012

Psychometric Evaluation of Visual Analog Scale for the Assessment of Chronic Tinnitus

    Purpose

    The development of therapeutic interventions for chronic tinnitus requires sensitive and clinically responsive tools to measure treatment-induced changes in tinnitus loudness and annoyance. In this study, the authors evaluated the psychometric properties of patient-reported visual analog scales (VAS) for measuring subjectively perceived tinnitus loudness and annoyance.

    Method

    The authors analyzed data from a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of acoustic coordinated reset (CR) neuromodulation in patients with chronic tinnitus (trial registration: “Randomized Evaluation of Sound Evoked Treatment of Tinnitus [RESET] study”; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00927121) to assess the reliability, validity, and minimally clinically identifiable difference (MCID) of the VAS loudness and VAS annoyance. The VAS loudness and VAS annoyance were completed at screening, at baseline, and at 5 visits during the 16 weeks of the clinical study. Data were analyzed with respect to test–retest reliability, validity, and MCID.

    Results

    VAS loudness and VAS annoyance showed good test-retest reliability of .8 and .79, respectively. In terms of convergent validity, VAS loudness and VAS annoyance correlated well with the tinnitus questionnaire at all clinical visits (max r = .67, p < .05). MCID estimates clustered between 10 and 15 points.

    Conclusion

    VAS loudness and VAS annoyance are valid and effective measurements for capturing reductions in tinnitus severity in patients with chronic tinnitus.

    References

    • Aazh, H., El Refaie, A., & Humphriss, R. (2011). Gabapentin for tinnitus: A systematic review.American Journal of Audiology, 20, 151–158doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0041)
    • Aazh, H., Moore, B. C. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (2008, November3). Simplified form of tinnitus retraining therapy in adults: A retrospective study.BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, 8. (Article No. 7). doi:10.1186/1472-6815-8-7.
    • Beaton, D. E., Boers, M., & Wells, G. A. (2002). Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): A literature review and directions for future research.Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 14, 109–114. doi:10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006
    • Bijur, P. E., Silver, W., & Gallagher, E. J. (2001). Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain.Academic Emergency Medicine, 8, 1153–1157. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x
    • Busner, J., & Targum, S. D. (2007). The clinical global impressions scale: Applying a research tool in clinical practice.Psychiatry (Edgmont), 4, 28–37.
    • Cella, D., Eton, D. T., Lai, J. S., Peterman, A. H., & Merkel, D. E. (2002). Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales.Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24, 547–561. doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00529-8
    • Cella, D., Hahn, E. A., & Dineen, K. (2002). Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening.Quality of Life Research, 11, 207–221. doi:10.1023/A:1015276414526
    • Crönlein, T., Langguth, B., Geisler, P., & Hajak, G. (2007). Tinnitus and insomnia.In B. Langguth, G. Hajak, T. Kleinjung, A. Cacace, & A. R. Moller (Eds.), Tinnitus: pathophysiology and treatment, 166(pp. 227–233). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific.
    • De Ridder, D., Vanneste, S., van der Loo, E., Plazier, M., Menovsky, T., & van de Heyning, P. (2010). Burst stimulation of the auditory cortex: A new form of neurostimulation for noise-like tinnitus suppression.Journal of Neurosurgery, 112, 1289–1294. doi:10.3171/2009.10.jns09298
    • de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Ostelo, R. W., Beckerman, H., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: Distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change [Review].Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4. (Article No. 54). doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-54.
    • Eton, D. T., Cella, D., Yost, K. J., Yount, S. E., Peterman, A. H., Neuberg, D. S., & Wood, W. C. (2004). A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57, 898–910. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.012
    • Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., Jr., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, R. M. (2001). Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale.Pain, 94, 149–158.
    • Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis.Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 861–874. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
    • Figueiredo, R. R., Azevedo, A. A., & Oliveira, P. de M. (2009). Correlation analysis of the visual-analogue scale and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory in tinnitus patients.Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 75, 76–79.
    • Fleiss, J. L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY: Wiley.
    • Frank, E., Schecklmann, M., Landgrebe, M., Burger, J., Kreuzer, P., Poeppl, T. B., & Langguth, B. (2011). Treatment of chronic tinnitus with repeated sessions of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation: Outcomes from an open-label pilot study.Journal of Neurology, 259, 327–333. doi:10.1007/s00415-011-6189-4
    • Goebel, G., & Hiller, W. (1998). Tinnitus-Fragebogen: Ein Instrument zur Erfassung von Belastung und Schweregrad bei Tinnitus, Handanweisung [Tinnitus Questionnaire: An instrument for measuring tinnitus distress and severity of tinnitus; instruction manual]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, Verlag für Psychologie.
    • Goebel, G., Rübler, D., Stepputat, F., Hiller, W., Heuser, J., & Fichter, M. M. (1999). Controlled prospective study of tinnitus retraining therapy compared to tinnitus coping therapy and broad-band noise generator therapy.In J. W. P. Hazell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar (pp. 302–306). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Tinnitus and Hyperacusis CentreRetrieved from http://www.tinnitus.org/home/its99/Proceedings%20ITS99.pdf
    • Goodwin, P. E., & Johnson, R. M. (1980). The loudness of tinnitus.Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 90, 353–359.
    • Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Spring, MD: AuthorRetrieved from www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf
    • Hagg, O., Fritzell, P., & Nordwall, A. (2003). The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain.European Spine Journal, 12, 12–20. doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0464-0
    • Hallam, R. S., Jakes, S. C., & Hinchcliffe, R. (1988). Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 213–222.
    • Hauser, R. A., & Auinger, P. (2011). Determination of minimal clinically important change in early and advanced Parkinson’s disease.Movement Disorders, 26, 813–818. doi:10.1002/mds.23638
    • Hendriks, E. J. M., Bernards, A. T. M., de Bie, R. A., & de Vet, C. W. (2008). The minimal important change of the PRAFAB questionnaire in women with stress urinary incontinence: Results from a prospective cohort study.Neurourology and Urodynamics, 27, 379–387. doi:10.1002/nau.20554
    • Hiller, W., & Goebel, G. (2006). Factors influencing tinnitus loudness and annoyance.Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 132, 1323–1330. doi:10.1001/archotol.132.12.1323
    • Holmes, S., & Padgham, N. D. (2009). Review paper: more than ringing in the ears: A review of tinnitus and its psychosocial impact.Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 2927–2937. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02909.x
    • Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.67.3.300
    • Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12
    • Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.Controlled Clinical Trials, 10, 407–415. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
    • Jastreboff, P. J. (2007). Tinnitus retraining therapy.Progress in Brain Research, 166, 415–423. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66040-3
    • Kreuzer, P. M., Landgrebe, M., Schecklmann, M., Poeppl, T. B., Vielsmeier, V., Hajak, G., & Langguth, B. (2011). Can temporal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation be enhanced by targeting affective components of tinnitus with frontal rTMS? A randomized controlled pilot trial.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 5, 88. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00088
    • Landgrebe, M., Azevedo, A., Baguley, D., Bauer, C., Cacace, A., Coelho, C., & Langguth, B. (2012). Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: A proposal for an international standard.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73, 21–112.
    • Langguth, B., Goodey, R., Azevedo, A., Bjorne, A., Cacace, A., Crocetti, A., & Vergara, R. (2007). Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006.Progress in Brain Research, 166, 525–536.
    • Malouff, J. M., Schutte, N. S., & Zucker, L. A. (2011). Tinnitus-related distress: A review of recent findings.Current Psychiatry Reports, 13, 31–36. doi:10.1007/s11920-010-0163-1
    • Martinez-Devesa, P., Perera, R., Theodoulou, M., & Waddell, A. (2010, September8). Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8(9). Article No. CD005233. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005233.pub3
    • A. R. Møller, B. Langguth, D. DeRidder, & T. Kleinjung (Eds.), 2010). Textbook of tinnitus. New York, NY: Springer.
    • Noble, W. (1998). Self-assessment of hearing and related functions. London, United Kingdom: Whurr.
    • Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.Medical Care, 41, 582–592. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C
    • Okhovat, A., Berjis, N., Okhovat, H., Malekpour, A., & Abtahi, H. (2011). Low-level laser for treatment of tinnitus: A self-controlled clinical trial.Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 16, 33–38.
    • Poreisz, C., Paulus, W., Moser, T., & Lang, N. (2009). Does a single session of theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of inferior temporal cortex affect tinnitus perception?.BMC Neuroscience, 10. (Article No. 54). doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-54.
    • Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 102–109. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
    • Revicki, D. A., Cella, D., Hays, R. D., Sloan, J. A., Lenderking, W. R., & Aaronson, N. K. (2006, September27). Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes.Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4. (Article No. 70). doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-70.
    • Snow, J. B. (2004). Tinnitus: Theory and management. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker.
    • Tass, P. A., Adamchic, I., Freund, H.-J., von Stackelberg, T., & Hauptmann, C. (2012). Counteracting tinnitus by acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation.Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 30, 137–159. doi:10.3233/RNN-2012-110218
    • Todd, K. H., & Funk, J. P. (1996). The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores.Academic Emergency Medicine, 3, 142–146. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03402.x
    • Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D., & Furlong, W. (2001). Visual analog scales: Do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states?.Medical Decision Making, 21, 329–334.
    • Tyler, R. S., Oleson, J., Noble, W., Coelho, C., & Ji, H. (2007). Clinical trials for tinnitus: Study populations, designs, measurement variables, and data analysis.Progress in Brain Research, 166, 499–509.
    • Vanneste, S., Plazier, M., Van de Heyning, P., & De Ridder, D. (2011). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation frequency dependent tinnitus improvement by double cone coil prefrontal stimulation.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 82, 1160–1164. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2010.213959
    • Wheaton, L., & Pope, J. (2010). The minimally important difference for patient-reported outcomes in spondyloarthropathies including pain, fatigue, sleep, and health assessment questionnaire.Journal of Rheumatology, 37, 816–822. doi:10.3899/jrheum.090086
    • Williams, V. S., Morlock, R. J., & Feltner, D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety.Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8. (Article No. 57). doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-57.
    • Wyrwich, K. W., Nienaber, N. A., Tierney, W. M., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1999). Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life.Medical Care, 37, 469–478. doi:10.1097/00005650-199905000-00006
    • Yost, K. J., & Eton, D. T. (2005). Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: The FACIT experience.Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28, 172–191. doi:10.1177/0163278705275340
    • Zeman, F., Koller, M., Figueiredo, R., Aazevedo, A., Rates, M., Coelho, C., & Landgrebe, M. (2011). Tinnitus handicap inventory for evaluating treatment effects: Which changes are clinically relevant?.Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 145, 282–287. doi:10.1177/0194599811403882

    Additional Resources