No access
Perspective
March 1998

Guidelines for Hearing Aid Fitting for Adults

Publication: American Journal of Audiology
Volume 7, Number 1
Pages 5-13

Abstract

The Guidelines for Hearing Aid Fitting for Adults were developed by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Ad Hoc Committee on Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting. Members of the committee are Michael Valente, chair; Ruth Bentler; Holly S. Kaplan, ex officio; Richard Seewald; Timothy Trine; Dennis Van Vliet; and Lawrence W. Higdon, Vice President for Professional Practices in Audiology, monitoring vice president.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

American National Standards Institute. (1969). Methods for calculation of the articulation index (ANSI S3.5). New York: Author.
American National Standards Institute. (1992). Testing hearing aids with a broad-band noise signal (ANSI S3.42-1992). New York: Author.
American National Standards Institute. (1996a). Specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: Author.
American National Standards Institute. (1996b). Specification of hearing aid characteristics (ANSI A3.22-1996). New York: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1984). Definition and competencies for aural rehabilitation. Asha, 5, 37–41.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1987). Private practice. Rockville, MD: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1990). Aural rehabilitation: An annotated bibliography. Asha, 33 (suppl. 1), 1–2.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991a). Report on private practice. Asha, 33 (suppl. 6), 1–4.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991b). Considerations for establishing a private practice in audiology and/or speech-language pathology. Asha, 33 (suppl. 3), 10–21.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991c). Business, marketing, ethics, professionalism in audiology: Annotated bibliography (1986–1989). Asha, 33 (suppl. 3), 39–45.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1993). Preferred practice patterns for the professions of speech-language pathology and audiology. Asha, 35 (Suppl. 11), i–viii, 1–96.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1994a). Guidelines for fitting and monitoring FM systems. Asha, 36 (suppl. 12), 1–9.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1994b). Code of Ethics, Asha, 36 (suppl. 13), 1–2.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1994c). Development and management of audiology practices. Rockville, MD: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1995). Model bill of rights: Clients as consumers receiving audiology or speech pathology services. Asha, 37, 37.
Bentler, R. A., & Pavlovic, C. V. (1989). Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research. Ear & Hearing, 10, 58–63.
Berger, K., Hagberg, E., & Rane, R. (1989). Prescription of hearing aids: Rationale, procedures and results (5th ed.). Kent, OH: Herald Publishing House.
Byrne, D., & Dillon, H. (1986). The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear & Hearing, 7, 257–265.
Byrne, D., Parkinson, A., & Newall, P. (1991). Modified hearing aid selection procedures for severe/profound hearing losses. In G. A. Studebaker, F. H. Bess, & L. Beck (Eds.), Vanderbilt hearing aid report II (pp. 295–300). Parkton, MD: York Press.
Cox, R. M. (1983). Using ULCL measures to find frequency-gain and SSPL90. Hearing Instruments, 34, 17–21, 39.
Cox, R. M. (1985). A structured approach to hearing aid selection. Ear & Hearing, 6, 226–239.
Cox, R. M. (1988). The MSU hearing instrument prescription procedure. Hearing Instruments, 39, 6–10.
Cox, R. M. (1995). Page ten: A hands-on discussion of the IHAFF approach. Hearing Journal, 48, 10, 39–44.
Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (1995). The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear & Hearing, 16, 176–183.
Cox, R. M., & Bisset, J. D. (1984). Relationship between two measures of aided binaural advantage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 49, 399–408.
Cox, R. M., DeChicchis, A. R., & Wark, D. J. (1981). Demonstration of binaural advantage in audiometric test rooms. Ear & Hearing, 2, 194– 201.
Cox, R. M. & Moore, J. N. (1988). Composite speech spectrum for hearing aid gain prescriptions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 102–107.
Demorest, M. E., & Erdman, S. A. (1986). Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 129–139.
Dillon, H., James, A. M., & Ginis, I. (1997). Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8, 27–43.
Dillon, H., & Storey, L. (in press). The National Acoustics Laboratories procedure for selecting the maximum power output of hearing aids: Theoretical derivation. Ear and Hearing.
Giolas, T. G., Owens, E., Lamb, S. H., & Schubert, E. D. (1979). Hearing performance inventory. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 44, 169–195.
Gitles, T. C., & Niquette, P. P. (1995). FIG6 in ten. Hearing Review, 2, 28, 30.
Gudmundsen, G. (1994). Fitting CIC hearing aids—some practical pointers. Hearing Journal, 47, 45–47.
Hawkins, D. B., Prosek, R. A., Walden, B. E., & Montgomery, A. A. (1987). Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 37–43.
Humes, L. E. (1991). Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2, 59–69.
Humes, L. E. (1996). Evolution of prescriptive fitting approaches. American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 19–23.
Hyde, M. L., & Riko, K. (1994). A decision-analytic approach to audiological rehabilitation. In J. P. Gagné & N. Tye-Murray (Eds.), Research in audiological rehabilitation. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, Monograph Supplement, 337–374.
Lesner, S. A., & Kricos, P. B. (1995). Audiologic rehabilitation: A holistic approach. Chapter 2 in P. B. Kricos and S. A. Lesner (Eds.), Hearing care for the older adult (pp. 21–58). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Lybarger, S. F. (1963). Simplified fitting system for hearing aids. Canonsburg, PA: Radioear.
Markides, A. (1977). Binaural hearing aids. London: Academic Press.
McCandless, G. A., & Lyregaard, P. E. (1983). Prescription of Gain/Output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hearing Instruments, 35, 16–21.
Moodie, K. S., Seewald, R. C., & Sinclair, S. T. (1994). Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid performance in young children. American Journal of Audiology, 3, 23–31.
Mueller, H. G., Hawkins, D. B., & Northern, J. L. (1992). Probe microphone measurements: Hearing aid selection and assessment. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
Mueller, H. G., & Killion, M. C. (1990). An easy method for calculating the articulation index. Hearing Journal, 43(9), 14–17.
Newman, C. W., & Weinstein, B. E. (1988). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear & Hearing, 9, 81–85.
Newman, C. W., Weinstein, B. E., Jacobson, G. P., & Hug, G. A. (1990). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: Psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear & Hearing, 11, 430–433.
Newman, C. W., Weinstein, B. E., Jacobson, G. P., & Hug, G. A. (1991). Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap for adults. Ear & Hearing, 12, 355–357.
Paul-Brown, D. (1994). Clinical record keeping in audiology and speech-language pathology. Asha, 36, 39–42.
Pavlovic, C. V. (1991). Speech recognition and five articulation indexes. Hearing Instruments, 42(9), 20–23.
Pearsons, K. S., Bennett, R. L., & Fidell, S. (1977). Speech levels in various environments: Project report on contract 68 01 2466. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Pediatric Working Group of the Conference on Amplification for Children With Auditory Deficits. (1996). Amplification for infants and children with hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology, 5, 53–68.
Randolph, K. J., Bornstein, S. P., Giolas, T., & Maxon, A. (1981). The effects of frequency response smoothness and stimulus type of loudness discomfort level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70 (Suppl. 1), S105.
Revit, L. (1994). Using coupler tests in the fitting of hearing aids. In M. Valente (Ed.), Strategies for selecting and verifying hearing aid fittings (pp. 64–87). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
Schwartz, D. M., Lyregaard, P. E., & Lundh, P. (1988). Hearing aid selection for severe-to-profound hearing loss. Hearing Journal, 41, 13–17.
Seewald, R. C., Cornelisse, L. E., Ramji, K. V., Sinclair, S. T., Moodie, K. S., & Jamieson, D. G. (1997). DSL 4.1 for windows: A software implementation of the desired sensation level (DSL[i/o]) method for fitting linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments. London, Ont: Hearing Healthcare Research Unit, Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Western Ontario.
Skinner, M. W. (1988). Hearing aid evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Staff. (1977). Hearing aid devices: Professional and client labeling and conditions for sale. Federal Register, 42(31), 9286–9297.
Storey, L., Dillon, H., Yeend, I., & Wigney, D. (in press). The National Acoustic Laboratories procedure for selecting the maximum power output of hearing aids: Experimental validation. Ear and Hearing.
Studebaker, G. (1974). The acoustical effect of various factors on the frequency response of a hearing aid receiver. Journal of Audio Engineering Society, 22, 329–334.
Valente, M., & Van Vliet, D. (1997). The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) protocol. Trends in Amplification, 2, 1–30.
Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A new tool. Ear & Hearing, 3, 128–134.
Walden, B. C., Demorest, M. E., & Hepler, E. L. (1984). Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 49–56.
Weinstein, B., Spritzer, J., & Ventry, I. (1986). Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap for the Elderly. Ear & Hearing, 7, 295–299.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

American Journal of Audiology
Volume 7Number 1March 1998
Pages: 5-13

History

  • Published in issue: Mar 1, 1998

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. amplification
  2. audiologic rehabilitation
  3. hearing aids
  4. probe microphone measurements

Authors

Affiliations

ASHA Ad Hoc Committee on Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Hearing Aid Fitting and Fine-tuning Strategies Implemented by Certified Audiologists in India, Indian Journal of Otology, 10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_55_24, 30, 2, (109-116), (2024).
  • Factors in the Effective Use of Hearing Aids among Subjects with Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10.3390/jcm13144027, 13, 14, (4027), (2024).
  • Development and Evaluation of a Loudness Validation Method With Natural Signals for Hearing Aid Fitting, Trends in Hearing, 10.1177/23312165241299778, 28, (2024).
  • “Close to My Community”: A Qualitative Study of Community Health Worker-Supported Teleaudiology Hearing Aid Services, Ear & Hearing, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001507, 45, 5, (1191-1201), (2024).
  • Amplifying Access: Progress After 1 Year of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids, Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 10.1044/2024_PERSP-23-00279, 9, 2, (347-354), (2024).
  • Alignment of Audiologists' Values With Best-Practice Standards: Insights From a National Survey, American Journal of Audiology, 10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00102, 33, 4, (1291-1305), (2024).
  • Classification, registration and segmentation of ear canal impressions using convolutional neural networks, Medical Image Analysis, 10.1016/j.media.2024.103152, 94, (103152), (2024).
  • Practice Trends for Hearing Aid Fitting for Adults Among Audiologists in India: A Survey, Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 10.1007/s12070-024-04997-x, 76, 6, (5428-5433), (2024).
  • The effect of remote fitting technology on hearing aid satisfaction, The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 10.1186/s43163-023-00447-7, 39, 1, (2023).
  • 16 Audiological Management II, Essentials of Audiology, 10.1055/b-0042-191977, (2023).
  • See more

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share