No access
Research Article
October 2001

The Leading-Edge: The Significance of Sentence Disruptions in the Development of Grammar

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 44, Number 5
Pages 1131-1143

Abstract

This research explored the relationship between sentence disruptions and the length and complexity of sentences spoken by children developing grammar. The study was cross-sectional in design and used samples of naturalistic, conversational interaction between 26 typically developing children (ages 2;6 to 4;0) and a primary caregiver. The active, declarative sentences produced by these children were coded for the presence of disruption, length in morphemes and words, and clausal complexity. The results showed that, for the majority of the children, disrupted sentences tended to be longer and more complex than fluent sentences. The magnitude of the differences in length and complexity was positively correlated with the children's grammatical development, as measured by the Index of Productive Syntax. It was also found that differences between the average complexity of disrupted versus fluent sentences increased with grammatical development even when sentence length was held constant. As grammatical development proceeded, disrupted sentences were more apt to be sentences on the "leading-edge" of the child's production capacity. Although these more advanced grammatical structures are part of the child's grammatical competence, the child cannot produce these sentences without an increased risk of processing difficulty. The results are congruent with proposals concerning the incremental and procedural nature of adult sentence production.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bernstein, N. (1981). Are there constraints on childhood disfluency? Journal of Fluency Disorder, 6, 341–350.
Bernstein Ratner, N., & Costa Sih, C. (1987). Effects of gradual increases in sentence length and complexity on children's dysfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 278–287.
Bloom, L., Tackeff, J., & Lahey, M. (1984). Learning to speak in complement constructions. Journal of Child Language, 11, 391–406.
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego: Academic Press.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Colburn, N., & Mysak, E. (1982). Developmental disfluency and emerging grammar: II. Co-occurrence of disfluency with specified semantic-syntactic structures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 421–427.
Garrett, M. (1984). The organization of processing structure for language production. D. Caplan, A. LeCours, & A. Smith (Eds.), Biological perspectives on language (pp. 172–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hadley, P. (1998). Early verb-related vulnerability among children with specific language impariment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 384–1397.
Haynes, W., & Hood, S. (1978). Disfluency changes in children as a function of the systematic modification of linguistic complexity. Journal of Communications Disorders, 11, 79–93.
Holmes, V. (1988). Hesitations and sentence planning. Language and Cognitive Process, 3, 323–361.
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.
Leadholm, B., & Miller, J. (1992). Language sample analysis: The Wisconsin guide. Milwaukee: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Loban, W. (1976). The language of elementary school children (NCTE Research Report No 1). Urbana IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McLaughlin, S., & Cullinan, W. (1989). Disfluencies, utterance length, and linguistic complexity in nonstuttering children. Journal of Fluency Disorder, 14, 17–36.
Rispoli, M. (1998). Patterns of pronoun case error. Journal of Child Language, 25, 533–554.
Rispoli, M. (1999). Case and agreement in English language development. Journal of Child Language, 26, 357–372.
Rispoli, M., & Hadley, P. (2000). An initial exploration into the development of incremental sentence production. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Scarborough, H. (1990). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22.
Wijnen, F. (1990). The development of sentence planning. Journal of Child Language, 17, 651–675.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 44Number 5October 2001
Pages: 1131-1143

History

  • Received: Nov 20, 2000
  • Accepted: May 3, 2001
  • Published in issue: Oct 1, 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. language development
  2. sentence disruptions
  3. sentence production

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew Rispoli [email protected]
Department of Communicative Disorders Northern Illinois University DeKalb
Pamela Hadley
Department of Communicative Disorders Northern Illinois University DeKalb

Notes

Contact author: Matthew Rispoli, PhD, 303 Gilbert Hall, Department of Communicative Disorders, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115-2899.
Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Speech Rate of Children With Developmental Language Disorder in a Narrative Context, Communication Disorders Quarterly, 10.1177/15257401241271417, (2024).
  • Disfluencies as a window to macrostructure performance in the narrative of bilingual children, Ampersand, 10.1016/j.amper.2024.100187, 13, (100187), (2024).
  • The use of mazes over time in Spanish heritage speakers in the US, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125131, 14, (2023).
  • Unique Patterns of Bilingual Speech: Factors Affecting Disfluency Rates in Russian–Hebrew Bilingual Children, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00048, 66, 12, (4896-4912), (2023).
  • Stalling for Time: Stall, Revision, and Stuttering-Like Disfluencies Reflect Language Factors in the Speech of Young Children, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00595, 66, 6, (2018-2034), (2023).
  • The Pausing Strategies in Chinese Preschool Children's Narratives, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00542, 66, 2, (431-443), (2023).
  • Speech disfluencies in bilingual Greek-English young adults, Journal of Fluency Disorders, 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.106001, 78, (106001), (2023).
  • , Child-directed Speech in Qaqet: A Language of East New Britain, Papua New Guinea, 10.22459/CDSQ.2022, (2022).
  • Stuttering Severity Judgments by Speech-Language Pathologists of Bilingual Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 10.1159/000528520, 75, 3, (164-176), (2022).
  • 4 Speech, Language, and Cognitive Processes, Stuttering and Related Disorders of Fluency, 10.1055/b-0042-189415, (2022).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share