No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Jun 2003

Outcomes of Early Language Delay

I. Predicting Persistent and Transient Language Difficulties at 3 and 4 Years

    Parent-based assessments of vocabulary, grammar, nonverbal ability, and use of language to refer to past and future (displaced reference) were obtained for 8,386 twin children at 2 years of age. Children with 2 year vocabulary scores below the 10th centile were designated the early language delay (ELD) group, and their outcomes at 3 and 4 years were contrasted with the remainder of the sample, the typical language (TL) group. At 3 and 4 years old, children were designated as language impaired if their scores fell below the 15th centile on at least 2 of the 3 parent-provided language measures: vocabulary, grammar, and use of abstract language. At 3 years, 44.1% of the ELD group (as compared to 7.2% of the TL group) met criteria for persistent language difficulties, decreasing slightly to 40.2% at 4 years (as compared to 8.5% of the TL group), consistent with previous reports of frequent spontaneous resolution of delayed language in preschoolers. Although relations between language and nonverbal abilities at 2 years and outcome at 3 and 4 years within the ELD group were highly statistically significant, effect sizes were small, and classification of outcome on the basis of data on 2-year-olds was far too inaccurate to be clinically useful. Children whose language difficulties persisted were not necessarily those with the most severe initial difficulties. Furthermore, measures of parental education and the child's history of ear infections failed to substantially improve the prediction.


    • Bishop, D. V. M., & Edmundson, A. (1987). Language-impaired four-year-olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 156–173.
    • Bishop, D. V. M., Price, T. S.,Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: II. Etiology of transient and persistent language difficulties.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,, 46, 561–575.
    • Colledge, E., Bishop, D. V. M., Koeppen-Schomerus, G., Price, T. S., Happé, F. G. E., Eley, T. C.,et al.. (2002). The structure of language abilities at 4 years: A twin study.Developmental Psychology, 38, 749–757.
    • Dale, P. S. (1996). Parent report assessment of language and communication. In K. N. Cole, Dale P. S., & Thal D. J. (Eds.), Assessment of communication and language (pp 161–182).
    • Dale, P. S., Dionne, G., Eley, T. C., & Plomin, R. (2000). Lexical and grammatical development: A behavioural genetic perspective.Journal of Child Language, 27, 619–642.
    • Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D. J., & Marchman, V. A. (2001). A parent report measure of language development for three-year-olds.Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri-Columbia.
    • Dale, P. S., Simonoff, E., Bishop, D. V., Eley, T. C., Oliver, B., Price, T. S.,et al. (1998). Genetic influence on language delay in two-year-old children.Nature Neuroscience, 1, 324–328.
    • Dionne, G., Dale, P. S., Boivin, M., & Plomin, R. (2003). Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development.Child Development, 74, 394–412.
    • Eley, T. C., Dale, P. S., Bishop, D. V. M., Price, T. S., & Plomin, R. (2001). Longitudinal analysis of componentsof cognitive delay: Examining the aetiology of verbal andperformance aspects of cognitive delay.Journal ofEducational Psychology, 93, 698–707.
    • Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in earlycommunicative development.Monographs of the Societyfor Research in Child Development, 59,(5, Serial No. 242).
    • Fenson, L., Pethick, S. J., Renda, C., Cox, J. L., Dale, P. S., & Reznick, J. S. (2000). Short-form versions of theMacArthur Communicative Development Inventories.Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 95–115.
    • Fischel, J. E., Whitehurst, G. J., Caulfield, M. B., & Debaryshe, B. (1989). Language growth in children withexpressive language delay.Pediatrics, 83, 218–227.
    • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in theeveryday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
    • Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., Whitehurst, G. J., Arnold, D. S., & Valdez-Menchaca, M. C. (1992). The role ofotitis media in the development of expressive languagedisorder.Developmental Psychology, 28, 430–440.
    • Oliver, B., Dale, P. S., Saudino, K. J., Petrill, S. A., Pike, A., & Plomin, R. (2002). The validity of a parent-based assessment of the nonverbal cognitive abilities of three-year-olds.Early Child Development and Care, 172, 337–348.
    • Paul, R. (1996). Clinical implications of the natural historyof slow expressive language development.AmericanJournal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5(2), 5–30.
    • Paul, R. (2000). Predicting outcomes of early expressivelanguage delay: Ethical implications. In D. V. M Bishop &L. B Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments inchildren: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 195–209). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
    • Paul, R., & Alforde, S. (1993). Grammatical morphemeacquisition in 4-year-olds with normal, impaired, and late-developing language.Journal of Speech and HearingResearch, 36, 1271–1275.
    • Rescorla, L. (2002). Language and reading outcomes to age9 in late-talking toddlers.Journal of Speech, Language,and Hearing Research, 45, 360–371.
    • Rescorla, L., Dahlsgaard, K., & Roberts, J. (2000). Late-talking toddlers: MLU and IPSyn outcomes at 3;0 and 4;0.Journal of Child Language, 27, 643–664.
    • Rescorla, L., Mirak, J., & Singh, L. (2000). Vocabularygrowth in late talkers: Lexical development from 2;0 to 3;0.Journal of Child Language, 27, 293–311.
    • Rescorla, L., Roberts, J., & Dahlsgaard, K. (1997). Latetalkers at 2: Outcome at 3.Journal of Speech and HearingResearch, 40, 556–566.
    • Rescorla, L., & Schwartz, E. (1990). Outcome of toddlerswith specific expressive language delay.Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 393–407.
    • Rovers, M., Haggard, M., Gannon, M., Koeppen-Schomerus, G., & Plomin, R. (2002). Heritability ofsymptom domains in otitis media: A longitudinal study of 1,373 twin pairs.American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 958–964.
    • Saudino, K. J., Dale, P. S., Oliver, B., Petrill, S. A., Richardson, V.,Rutter, M.,et al.. (1998). The validity ofparent-based assessment of the cognitive abilities of two-year-olds.Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 349–363.
    • Thal, D. J., & Katich, J. (1996). Predicaments in earlyidentification of specific language impairment: Does theearly bird always catch the worm? In K. N Cole, P. S Dale, & D. J Thal (Eds.), Assessment of communicationand language (pp. 1–28). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
    • Thal, D. J., O'Hanlon, L., Clemmons, M., & Fralin, L. (1999). Validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax for preschool children with language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 482–496.
    • Trouton, A., Spinath, F., & Plomin, R. (2002). Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): A multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition, and behaviour problems in childhood.Twin Research, 5, 444–448..
    • Viding, E., Colledge, E., Spinath, F. M., Price, T. S., Bishop, D. V. M., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (in press). Genetic and environmental influence on language impairment in 4-year-old same-sex and opposite-sex twins.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
    • Whitehurst, G. J., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). Early develop-mental language delay: What, if anything, should theclinician do about it.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 613–648.
    • Whitehurst, G. J., Fischel, J. E., Arnold, D. S., & Lonigan, C. J. (1992). Evaluating outcomes with children with expressive language delay. In S. F. Warren & J. E. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 277–313). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Additional Resources