No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Apr 2004

Orofacial Movements Associated With Fluent Speech in Persons Who Stutter

Corresponding author: e-mail:

Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/024)

This study was intended to replicate and extend previous findings that (a) during fluent speech persons who stutter (PS) and those who do not (NS) differ in their vocal tract closing movements (L. Max, A. J. Caruso, & V. L. Gracco, 2003) and (b) ratios relating lip and tongue speed to jaw speed increase with stuttering severity (M. D. McClean & C. R. Runyan, 2000). An electromagnetic system was used to record movements of the upper lip, lower lip, tongue, and jaw of 43 NS and 37 PS during productions of a nonsense phrase and a sentence. Measurement and analysis of movement speeds, durations, and ratios of lip and tongue speed to jaw speed were performed on fluent productions of a nonsense phrase and sentence. Statistical comparisons were made between PS with low and high stuttering severity levels (LPS and HPS) and NS. Significant variations across groups in movement speed and duration were observed, but the pattern of these effects was complex and did not replicate the results of the two earlier studies. In the nonsense phrase, significant reductions in lower lip closing duration, jaw closing duration, and jaw closing speed were seen in PS. In the sentence task, HPS showed elevated tongue opening and closing durations. For tongue opening in the sentence, LPS showed elevated speeds and HPS showed reduced speeds. The elevated speeds for LPS are interpreted as a contributing factor to speech disfluency, whereas the reduced speeds and increased durations in HPS are attributed to adaptive behavior intended to facilitate fluent speech. Significant group effects were not seen for the speed ratio measures. Results are discussed in relation to multivariate analyses intended to identify subgroups of PS.

References

Armson, J., & Stuart, A. (1998). Effect of extended exposure to frequency-altered feedback on stuttering during reading and monologue.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 479–490.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
CarusoA.,AbbsJ., & GraccoV. (1988). Kinematic analysis of speech multiple movement coordination in stutterers.Brain, 111, 439–455.
Google Scholar
Gracco, V. L. (1994). Some organizational characteristics of speech movement control.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 4–27.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Kleinow, J., & Smith, A. (2000). Influences of length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor stability of the fluent speech of adults who stutter.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 548–559.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Max, L.,Caruso, A. J., & Gracco, V. L. (2003). Kinematic analysis of speech, orofacial speech, and finger movements in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 215–232.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
McClean, M. D. (1997). Functional components of the motor system: An approach to understanding the mechanisms of speech disfluency.In W. Hulstijn, P. Van Lieshout, & H. Peters (Eds.), Speech production: Motor control, brain research and fluency disorders (pp. 99–118). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
McClean, M. D.,Kroll, R. M., & Loftus, N. S. (1990). Kinematic analysis of lip closure in stutterers’ fluent speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 755–760.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
McClean, M. D.,Kroll, R. M., & Loftus, N. S. (1991). Correlation of stuttering severity and lip closure in stutterers’ fluent speech.In H. F. M.W. PetersHulstjin, & C. W. Starkweather (Eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering (pp. 117–122). Amersterdam: Elsevier Science.
Google Scholar
McClean, M. D., & Runyan, C. R. (2000). Variations in the relative speeds of orofacial structures with stuttering severity.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1524–1531.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
McClean, M. D., & Tasko, S. M. (2003). Association of orofacial muscle activity and movement during changes in speech rate and intensity.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1387–1400.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Muma, J. R. (1993). The need for replication.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36, 927–930.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Riley, G. (1994). Stuttering Severity Instrument.: Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Google Scholar
Samar, V. J.,Metz, D. E., & Sacco, P. R. (1986). Changes in aerodynamic characteristics associated with therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 106–113.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Smith, A., & Kleinow, J. (2000). Kinematic correlates of speaking rate changes in stuttering and normally fluent adults.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 521–536.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Story, R. S.,Alfonso, P. J., & Harris, K. S. (1996). Pre- and posttreatment comparison of the kinematics of the fluent speech of persons who stutter.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 991–1005.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Tasko, S. M., & Westbury, J. R. (2002). Defining and measuring speech movement events.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 127–142.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Tuller, B.,Shao, S., & Kelso, J. A. (1990). An evaluation of an alternating magnetic field device for monitoring tongue movements.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 674–679.
Google Scholar
Westbury, J. R.,Lindstrom, M. J., & McClean, M. D. (2002). Tongue and lips without jaws: A comparison of methods for decoupling speech movements.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 651–662.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Zimmermann G. (1980a). Articulatory dynamics of fluent speech utterances of stutterers and nonstutterers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 95–107.
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Zimmermann G. (1980b). Stuttering: A disorder of movement.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 122–136.
ASHAWire Google Scholar