ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Aug 2004

Rate and Loudness Manipulations in Dysarthria

Acoustic and Perceptual Findings
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/058)

    Both rate reduction and increased loudness reportedly are associated with an increase in the size of the articulatory-acoustic working space and improved acoustic distinctiveness for speakers with dysarthria. Improved intelligibility also has been reported. Few studies have directly compared rate and loudness effects for speakers with dysarthria, however, although rate reduction and increasing vocal loudness are common treatment techniques. In the current study, 15 speakers with dysarthria secondary to multiple sclerosis, 12 speakers with dysarthria secondary to Parkinson’s disease (PD), and 15 healthy controls read a passage in habitual, loud, and slow conditions. Rate and loudness variations were elicited using magnitude production. Acoustic measures included articulatory rate, sound pressure level, vowel space area, first moment difference measures, and F2 trajectory characteristics for diphthongs. Ten listeners scaled intelligibility for reading passages produced by the speakers with dysarthria. Relationships between intelligibility estimates and acoustic measures were determined by regression analysis. All speaker groups reduced articulatory rate for the slow condition and increased vocal intensity for the loud condition, relative to the habitual condition. Vowel acoustic distinctiveness, as indexed by vowel space area, was maximized in the slow condition, but stop consonant acoustic distinctiveness, as indexed by first moment difference measures, was maximized in the loud condition. F2 slope measures for diphthongs were not consistently affected by rate or loudness. Scaled intelligibility for speakers with PD also improved in the loud condition relative to both the habitual and slow conditions. Intelligibility estimates for speakers with dysarthria, however, were not strongly related to acoustic measures of supraglottal behavior. Findings are compared with previous studies, and hypotheses for future treatment studies are discussed.

    References

    • Adams, S. G. (1994). Accelerating speech in a case of hypokinetic dysarthria: Descriptions and treatment..J. S. Till, K. M. Yorkston, & D. R. Beukelman (Eds.), Motor speech disorders: Advances in assessment and treatment (pp. 213–228). Baltimore: Brookes.
      Google Scholar
    • Bradlow, A. R., Toretta, G. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics.Speech Communication, 20, 255–272.
      Google Scholar
    • Bunton, K., & Weismer, G. (2001). The relationship between perception and acoustics for a high-low vowel contrast produced by dysarthric speakers.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1215–1228.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Bunton, K., & Weismer, G. (2002). Segmental level analysis of laryngeal function in persons with motor speech disorders.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 54, 223–239.
      Google Scholar
    • Caliguiri, M. P. (1989). The influence of speaking rate on articulatory hypokinesia in Parkinsonian dysarthria.Brain and Language, 36, 493–502.
      Google Scholar
    • Dromey, C. (2000). Articulatory kinematics in patients with Parkinson disease using different speech treatment approaches.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 155–161.
      Google Scholar
    • Dromey, C., & Ramig, L. O. (1998). Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: Their impact on measures of respiration, phonation, and articulation.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1003–1018.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Dromey, C., Ramig, L. O., & Johnson, A. B. (1995). Phonatory and articulatory changes associated with increased vocal intensity in Parkinson disease: A case study.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 751–764.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Duffy, J. R. (1995). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management.: St. Louis, MO: Mosby-YearBook.
      Google Scholar
    • Engen, T. (1971). Psychophysics: II. Scaling methods.In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth & Schlosberg’s experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 47–86). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
      Google Scholar
    • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Forrest, K., Weismer, G., Milenkovic, P., & Dougall, R. N. (1988). Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 115–123.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Forrest, K., Weismer, G., & Turner, G. S. (1989). Kinematic, acoustic, and perceptual analyses of connected speech produced by Parkinsonian and normal geriatric adults.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2608–2622.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Fourakis, M. (1991). Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1816–1827.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Hammen, V. L., & Yorkston, K. M. (1996). Speech and pause characteristics following speech rate reduction in hypokinetic dysarthria.Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 429–445.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Hartelius, L., Nord, L., & Buder, E. H. (1995). Acoustic analysis of dysarthria associated with multiple sclerosis.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 95–120.
      Google Scholar
    • Heinz, J. M., & Stevens, S. (1961). On the properties of fricative consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 589–593.
      Google Scholar
    • Huber, J. E., Stathopoulos, E. T., Curicone, G. M., Ash, T. A., & Johnson, K. (1999). Formants of children, women, and men: The effects of vocal intensity in variation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1532–1542.
      Google Scholar
    • Ishikki, N. (1965). Intensity and airflow rate.Folia Phoni-atrica, 17, 92–104.
      Google Scholar
    • Kent, R. D., Kent, J. F., Weismer, G., Martin, R. E., Sufit, R. L., Brooks, B. R., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1989). Relationships between speech intelligibility and the slope of second-formant transitions in dysarthric subjects.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 3, 347–358.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kleinow, J., Smith, A., & Ramig, L. O. (2001). Speech motor stability in IPD: Effects of rate and loudness manipulations.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1041–1051.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Liss, J. M., & Weismer, G. (1994). Selected acoustic characteristics of contrastive stress production in control geriatric, apraxic, and ataxic dysarthric speakers.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 8, 45–66.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • McHenry, M. A. (2003). The effect of pacing strategies on the variability of speech movement sequences in dysarthria.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 702–710.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • McRae, P. A., Tjaden, K., & Schoonings, B. (2002). Acoustic and perceptual consequences of articulatory rate change in Parkinson disease.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 35–50.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Milenkovic, P. (1997). CSpeech [Computer program]. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
      Google Scholar
    • Milenkovic, P. (2002). TF32. [Computer program].University of Wisconsin-Madison.
      Google Scholar
    • Nittrouer, S. (1995). Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: Evidence from spectral moments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 520–530.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O. (1992). The role of phonation in speech intelligibility: A review and preliminary data from patients with Parkinson’s disease.In R. D. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement, and management (pp. 119–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O., Bonitati, C. M., Lemke, J. H., & Horii, Y. (1994). Voice treatment for patients with Parkinson disease: Development of an approach and preliminary efficacy data.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 2, 191–209.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O., Countryman, S., O’Brien, C., Hoehn, M., & Thomson, L. L. (1996). Intensive speech treatment for patients with Parkinson disease: Short- and long-term comparison of two techniques.Neurology, 47, 1496–1504.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O., Countryman, S., Thompson, L. L., & Horii, Y. (1995). Comparison of two forms of intensive speech treatment for Parkinson disease.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1232–1251.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O., & Dromey, C. (1996). Aerodynamic mechanisms underlying treatment related changes in SPL in patients with Parkinson disease.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 798–807.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O., & Fox, C. (2000). Lee Silverman Voice Treatment: An update [Videotape].National Center for Neurogenic Communication Disorders Telerounds, 56.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O., Pawlas, A., & Countryman, S. (1995). The Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT): A practical guide to treating the voice and speech disorders in Parkinson disease.: Iowa City: University at Iowa, National Center for Voice and Speech.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L. O., Sapir, S., Fox, C., & Countryman, S. (2001). Changes in loudness following intensive voice treatment (LSVT) in individuals with Parkinson’s disease: A comparison with untreated patients and normal age-matched controls.Movement Disorders, 16, 79–83.
      Google Scholar
    • Recasens, D. (1999). Lingual coarticulation.In W. J. Hardcastle & N. Hewlett (Eds.), Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques (pp. 81–103). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Sapir, S., Pawlas, A. A., Ramig, L. O., Seeley, E., Fox, C., & Corboy, J. (2001). Effects of intensive phonatory-repiratory treatment (LSVT) on voice in two individuals with multiple sclerosis.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 141–151.
      Google Scholar
    • Schulman, R. (1989). Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 295–312.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Shadle, C. H. (1990). Articulatory-acoustic relationships in fricative consonants.In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 187–209). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
      Google Scholar
    • Solomon, N. P., McKee, A. S., & Garcia-Berry, S. (2001). Intensive voice treatment and respiration treatment for hypokinetic-spastic dysarthria after traumatic brain injury.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 51–64.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Spielman, J. L., Ramig, L. O., Story, B. H., & Fox, C. (2000, November). Expansion of vowel space in Parkinson’s disease following the LSVT., Poster presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC.
      Google Scholar
    • Stevens, K. (1971). Airflow and turbulence noise for fricative and stop consonants: Static considerations.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 50, 1180–1192.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Theodoros, D. G., Thompson-Ward, E. C., Murdoch, B. E., Lethlean, J., & Silburn, P. (1999). The effects of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment program on motor speech function in Parkinson disease following thalamotomy and pallidotomy surgery: A case study.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 157–160.
      Google Scholar
    • Tjaden, K. (2003). Anticipatory coarticulation in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson disease.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 990–1008.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Tjaden, K., & Turner, G. S. (1997). Spectral properties of fricatives in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1358–1372.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Turner, G. S., Tjaden K., & Weismer, G. (1995). The influence of speaking rate on vowel space and speech intelligibility for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1001–1013.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Turner, G. S., & Weismer, G. (1993). Characteristics of speaking rate in the dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1134–1144.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ward, E. C., Theodoros, D. G., Murdoch, B. E., & Silburn, P. (2000). Changes in maximum capacity tongue function following the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Program.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 331–335.
      Google Scholar
    • Weismer, G. (1990). Assessment of articulatory timing.In J. Cooper (Ed.), Assessment of speech and voice production: Research and clinical applications (pp. 84–95). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.
      Google Scholar
    • Weismer, G. (1997). Motor speech disorders.In W. J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 191–219). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
      Google Scholar
    • Weismer, G., Jeng, J.-Y., Laures, J., Kent, R. D., & Kent, J. F. (2001). Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 53, 1–18.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Weismer, G., & Laures, J. S. (2002). Direct magnitude estimates of intelligibility in dysarthia: Effects of a chosen standard.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 421–433.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Weismer, G., Laures, J. S., Jeng, J.-Y., Kent, R. D., & Kent, J. F. (2000). Effect of speaking rate manipulations on acoustic and perceptual aspects of the dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 52, 201–219.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1981). Ataxic dysarthria: Treatment sequences based on intelligibility and prosodic considerations.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 398–404.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., & Bell, K. R. (1999). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults.: Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • Yorkston, K. M., Hammen, V. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Traynor, C. D. (1990). The effect of rate control on the intelligibility and naturalness of dysarthric speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 550–560.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources