ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Aug 2006

Perception of Coarticulatory Information in Normal Speech and Dysarthria

    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/064)

    Abstract

    Purpose

    This study addressed three research questions: (a) Can listeners use anticipatory vowel information in prevocalic consonants produced by talkers with dysarthria to identify the upcoming vowel? (b) Are listeners sensitive to interspeaker variation in anticipatory coarticulation during prevocalic consonants produced by healthy talkers and/or talkers with dysarthria, as measured by vowel identification accuracy? (c) Is interspeaker variation in anticipatory coarticulation reflected in measures of intelligibility?

    Method

    Stimuli included 106 CVC words produced by 20 speakers with either Parkinson’s disease or multiple sclerosis or by 16 healthy controls characterized by an operationally defined normal, under, or over level of anticipatory vowel coarticulation. Ten listeners were presented with prevocalic consonants for identification of the vowel. Ten additional listeners judged single-word intelligibility. An analysis of variance was used to determine differences in vowel identification accuracy and intelligibility as a function of speaker group, coarticulation level, and vowel type.

    Results

    Listeners accurately identified vowels produced by all speaker groups from the aperiodic portion of prevocalic consonants, but interspeaker variations in strength of coarticulation did not strongly affect vowel identification accuracy or intelligibility.

    Conclusions

    Listeners appear to be tuned to similar types of information in the acoustic speech stream irrespective of the source or speaker, and any perceptual effects of interspeaker variation in coarticulation are subtle.

    References

    • Ackermann, H., & Ziegler, W. (1991). Articulatory deficits in Parkinsonian dysarthria: An acoustic analysis.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 54, 1093–1098.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Baum, S. R. (1998). Anticipatory coarticulation in aphasia: Effects of utterance complexity.Brain and Language, 63, 357–380.
      Google Scholar
    • Beddor, P. S., Harnsberger, J. D., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: Acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates.Journal of Phonetics, 30, 591–627.
      Google Scholar
    • Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Exploiting lawful variability in the speech waveform.In J. S. Perkell, & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processing (pp. 360–385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning in a distributed model of speech perception.Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613–656.
      Google Scholar
    • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1999). Ambiguity, competition, and blending in spoken word recognition.Cognitive Science, 23, 439–432.
      Google Scholar
    • Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Luce, P. A. (1996). Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Research and theory.In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Principles of experimental phonetics (pp. 277–327). St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.
      Google Scholar
    • Hertrich, I., & Ackermann, H. (1999). Temporal and spectral aspects of coarticulation in ataxic dysarthria: An acoustic analysis.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 367–381.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Katz, W. F. (1988). Anticipatory coarticulation in aphasia: Acoustic and perceptual data.Brain and Language, 35, 340–368.
      Google Scholar
    • Katz, W. F. (2000). Anticipatory coarticulation and aphasia: Implications for phonetic theories.Journal of Phonetics, 28, 313–334.
      Google Scholar
    • Katz, W. F., Kripke, C., & Tallal, P. (1991). Anticipatory coarticulation in the speech of adults and young children: Acoustic, perceptual, and video data.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1222–1232.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Kent, R., & Moll, K. (1972). Cinefluorographic analyses of selected lingual consonants.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 453–473.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Kuehn, D. P., & Moll, K. L. (1972). Perceptual effects of forward coarticulation.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 654–664.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Kuhnert, B., & Hoole, P. (2004). Speaker-specific kinematic properties of alveolar reductions in English and German.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 18, 559–575.
      Google Scholar
    • Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception.Science, 243, 489–494.
      Google Scholar
    • Lubker, J. F., & Gay, T. (1982). Anticipatory labial coarticulation: Experimental, biological and linguistic.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 437–448.
      Google Scholar
    • Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 615–625.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Luce, P., & McClellan, C. (2005). Spoken word recognition: The challenge of variation.In D. B. Pisoni, & R. B. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 591–609). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
      Google Scholar
    • Manuel, S. Y. (1987). Acoustic and perceptual consequences of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in three Bantu languages. Unpublished dissertation, Yale University
      Google Scholar
    • Martin, J. G., & Bunnell, H. T. (1981). Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 559–567.
      Google Scholar
    • Martin, J. G., & Bunnell, H. T. (1982). Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel–stop consonant–vowel sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 473–488.
      Google Scholar
    • Mattys, S. (2004). Stress versus coarticulation: Toward an integrated approach to explicit speech segmentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 397–408.
      Google Scholar
    • McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (1997). Cognitive processes in speech perception.In W. J. Hardcastle, & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 566–586). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
      Google Scholar
    • Milenkovic, P. (1997). CSpeechSp 4.0 [Computer software].Madison, WI: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin.
      Google Scholar
    • Nittrouer, S. (1995). Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: Evidence from spectral moments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 520–530.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Nittrouer, S., & Whalen, D. H. (1989). The perceptual effects of child–adult differences in fricative–vowel coarticulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1266–1276.
      Google Scholar
    • Nittrouer, S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & McGowan, R. S. (1989). The emergence of phonetic segments: Evidence from the spectral structure of fricative–vowel syllables spoken by children and adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 120–132.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ostreicher, H. J., & Sharf, D. J. (1976). Effects of coarticulation on the identification of deleted consonant and vowel sounds.Journal of Phonetics, 4, 285–301.
      Google Scholar
    • Sereno, J. A., Baum, S. R., Marean, G. C., & Lieberman, P. (1987). Acoustic analysis and perceptual data on anticipatory labial coarticulation in adults and children.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 512–519.
      Google Scholar
    • Southwood, H., Dagenais, P. A., Sutphin, S. M., & Garcia, J. M. (1997). Coarticulation in apraxia of speech: A perceptual, acoustic, and electropalatographic study.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 179–203.
      Google Scholar
    • Sussman, H. M., Fruchter, D., Hilbert, J., & Sirosh, J. (1998). Linear correlates in the speech signal: The orderly output constraint.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 241–299.
      Google Scholar
    • Tjaden, K. (2003). Anticipatory coarticulation in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 990–1008.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Tjaden, K., & Turner, G. (1997). Spectral properties of fricatives in ALS.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1358–1372.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. E. (2004). Rate and loudness manipulations in dysarthria: Acoustic and perceptual findings.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 766–783.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. E. (2005). Effect of rate reduction and increased loudness on acoustic measures of anticipatory coarticulation in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson disease.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 261–277.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Waldstein, R. S., & Baum, S. R. (1994). Perception of coarticulatory cues in the speech of children with profound hearing loss and children with normal hearing.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 952–959.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Weismer, G., & Martin, R. (1992). Acoustic and perceptual approaches to the study of intelligibility.In R. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement, and management (pp. 68–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
      Google Scholar
    • Weismer, G., Yunusova, Y., & Westbury, J. R. (2003). Interarticulator coordination in dysarthria: An X-ray microbeam study.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1247–1261.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Winitz, H., Scheib, M., & Reeds, J. (1972). Identification of stops and vowels from the burst portion of /p t k/ isolated from conversational speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1309–1317.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Soli, S. D. (1981). Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: Perceptual evidence of fricative–vowel coarticulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 966–975.
      Google Scholar
    • Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1981). Assessment of the intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Tigard, OR: CC Publications.
      Google Scholar
    • Ziegler, W., & von Cramon, D. R. (1985). Anticipatory coarticulation in a patient with apraxia of speech.Brain and Language, 26, 117–130.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ziegler, W., & von Cramon, D. R. (1986). Spastic dysarthria after acquired brain injury: An acoustic study.British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 173–187.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources