No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Note1 Aug 2008

An Evaluation of the Aurora System as a Flesh-Point Tracking Tool for Speech Production Research

Contact author: Bernd J. Kröger, Department of Phoniatrics, Pedaudiology, and Communication Disorders, University Hospital Aachen and Aachen University, Pauwelsstraβe 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. E-mail:

E-mail Address: [email protected]

University Hospital Aachen, Germany, and Aachen University, Germany

Google Scholar

Abstract

Purpose

Northern Digital Instruments (NDI; Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) manufactures a commercially available magnetometer device called Aurora that features real-time display of sensor position tracked in 3 dimensions. To test its potential for speech production research, data were collected to assess the measurement accuracy and reliability of the system.

Method

First, sensors affixed at a known distance on a rigid ruler were moved systematically through the measurement space. Second, sensors attached to the speech articulators of a human participant were tracked during various speech tasks.

Results

In the ruler task, results showed mean distance errors of less than 1 mm, with some sensitivity to location within the measurement field. In the speech tasks, Euclidean distance between jaw-mounted sensors showed comparable accuracy; however, a high incidence of missing samples was observed, positively correlated with sensor velocity.

Conclusions

The real-time positional feedback provided by the system makes it potentially useful in speech therapy applications. The overall missing data rate observed during speech tasks makes use of the system in its current form problematic for the quantitative measurement of speech articulator movements; however, NDI is actively working to improve the Aurora system for use in this context.

References

Aaron, M., Kerrien, E., Berger, M. O., & Laprie, Y. (2006, December). Coupling electromagnetic sensors and ultrasound images for tongue tracking: Acquisition set up and preliminary results–Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production.435–450. Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Google Scholar
Frantz, D. D., Wiles, A. D., Leis, S. E., & Kirsch, S. R. (2003). Accuracy assessment protocols for electromagnetic tracking systems.Physics in Medicine and Biology, 48, 2241–2251.
Google Scholar
Hoole, P. (1996). Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen der Artikulationsanalyse in der experimentellen Phonetik [Theoretical and methodical foundations for the analysis of articulation in experimental phonetics].Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München [Research Reports of the Institute of Phonetics and Speech Communication of the University of Munich], 34, 3–173.
Google Scholar
Hummel, J., Figl, M., Birkfellner, W., Bax, M. R., Shahidi, R., Maurer, C. R., & Bergmann, H. (2006). Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol.Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, N205–N210.
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Perkell, J. S., Cohen, M. H., Svirsky, M. A., Matthies, M. L., Garabieta, I., & Jackson, M. T. T. (1992). Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer (EMMA) systems for transducing speech articulatory movements.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3078–3096.
Google Scholar
Schönle, P. W., Gräbe, K., Wenig, P., Höhne, J., Schrader, J., & Conrad, B. (1987). Electromagnetic articulography: Use of alternating magnetic fields for tracking movements of multiple points inside and outside the vocal tract.Brain and Language, 31, 26–35.
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Zierdt, A., Hoole, P., & Tillmann, H. G. (1999, August). Development of a system for three-dimensional flesh-point measurement of speech movements. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.(ICPhS; pp. 73–75), San Francisco
Google Scholar