ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Aug 2009

Effects of Loud and Amplified Speech on Sentence and Word Intelligibility in Parkinson Disease

    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/08-0119)

    Abstract

    Purpose

    In the two experiments in this study, the author examined the effects of increased vocal effort (loud speech) and amplification on sentence and word intelligibility in speakers with Parkinson disease (PD).

    Methods

    Five talkers with PD produced sentences and words at habitual levels of effort and using loud speech techniques. Amplified sets of sentences and words were created by increasing the intensity of habitual stimuli to the level of loud stimuli. Listeners rated the intelligibility of the 3 sets of sentences on a 1–7 scale and transcribed the 3 sets of words.

    Results

    Both loud speech and amplification significantly improved intelligibility for sentences and words. Loud speech resulted in greater intelligibility improvement than amplification.

    Conclusions

    By comparing loud and amplified scores, about one third to one half of intelligibility improvement with loud speech could be attributed to increases in audibility or signal-to-noise ratio. Thus, factors other than increased intensity must be partly responsible for the loud speech benefit. Changes in articulation appear to play a relatively small role: Initial /h/ was the only consonant to consistently show improvement with loud speech. Phonatory changes such as improvements in F0 and spectral tilt may account for improved speech intelligibility using loud speech techniques.

    References

    • Ackermann, H., & Ziegler, W. (1991). Articulatory deficits in Parkinsonian dysarthria: An acoustic analysis.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 54, 1093–1098.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Adams, S. (1997). Hypokinetic dysarthria in Parkinson’s disease.In M. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 261–285). New York: Thieme.
      Google Scholar
    • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2004). Praat: Doing phnoetics by computer (Version 4.3) [Computer software].Retrieved January 6, 2004, from http://www.praat.org
      Google Scholar
    • Bunton, K. (2006). Fundamental frequency as a perceptual cue for vowel identification in speakers with Parkinson disease.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 58, 323–239.
      Google Scholar
    • Bunton, D., Kent, R. D., Kent, J. F., & Duffy, J. R. (2001). The effects of flattening fundamental frequency contours on sentence intelligibility in speakers with dysarthria.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 15, 181–193.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bunton, K., & Weismer, G. (2001). Segmental level analysis of laryngeal function in persons with motor speech disorders.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 5, 223–239.
      Google Scholar
    • Darley, F., Aronson, A., & Brown, J. (1969a). Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 246–249.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Darley, F., Aronson, A., & Brown, J. (1969b). Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 462–469.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • DeLetter, M., Santens, P., & Vanborsel, J. (2005). The effects of levadopa on word intelligibility in Parkinson’s disease.Journal of Communication Disorders, 38, 187–196.
      Google Scholar
    • Dromey, C. (2000). Articulatory kinematics in patients with Parkinson disease using different speech treatment approaches.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 155–161.
      Google Scholar
    • Dromey, C. (2003). Spectral measures and perceptual ratings of hypokinetic dysarthria.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 85–94.
      Google Scholar
    • Dromey, C., & Ramig, L. (1998). Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: Their impact on measures of respiration, phonation, and articulation.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1003–1018.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Dromey, C., Ramig, L., & Johnson, A. (1998). Phonatory and articulatory changes associated with increased vocal intensity in Parkinson disease: A case study.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 751–764.
      Google Scholar
    • Gayvert, R., & Hillenbrand, J. (2003). Open source software for speech perception research.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 2260.
      Google Scholar
    • Greene, M., & Watson, B. (1968). The value of speech amplification in Parkinson’s disease patients.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 20, 250–257.
      Google Scholar
    • Hoen, M., & Yahr, M. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression, and mortality.Neurology, 17, 427–442.
      Google Scholar
    • Hoodin, R., & Gilbert, H. (1989). Parkinsonian dysarthria: An aerodynamic and perceptual description of velopharyngeal closure for speech.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 41, 249–258.
      Google Scholar
    • Kent, R., Kim, H.-H., Weismer, G., Kent, J., Rosenbek, J., Brooks, B., & Workinger, M. (1994). Laryngeal dysfunction in neurological disease: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and stroke.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 2, 157–175.
      Google Scholar
    • Kent, R., Weismer, G., Kent, J., & Rosenbek, J. (1989). Toward phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 482–499.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Kleinow, J., Smith, A., & Ramig, L. (2001). Speech motor stability in IPD: Effects of rate and loudness manipulations.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1041–1051.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Lee, A. S.-Y., Ciocca, V., & Whitehill, T. (2003). Acoustic correlates of hypernasality.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 259–264.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Logemann, J., Fisher, H., Boshes, B., & Blonsky, E. (1978). Frequency and co-occurrence of vocal tract dysfunctions in the speech of a large sample of Parkinson patients.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 47–57.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ludlow, C., & Bassich, C. (1984). Relationships between perceptual ratings and acoustic measures of hypokinetic speech (pp. 163–195).In M. R. McNeil, J. C. Rosenbek, & A. E. Aronson (Eds.), The dysarthrias: Physiology, acoustics, perception, management. San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
      Google Scholar
    • Neel, A., & Beveridge, A. (2006, November). Identification of loud- and habitual-level vowels in Parkinson disease. Poster presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Convention, Miami, FL.
      Google Scholar
    • Pell, M., Cheang, H., & Leonard, C. (2006). The impact of Parkinson’s disease on vocal-prosodic communication from the perspective of listeners.Brain and Language, 97, 123–134.
      Google Scholar
    • Pickett, J. (1956). Effects of vocal force on the intelligibility of speech sounds.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 902–905.
      Google Scholar
    • Pickett, J. (1958). Intelligibility at high voice levels and the use of a megaphone.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 1100–1104.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L. (1992). The role of phonation in speech intelligibility: A review and preliminary data from patients with Parkinson’s disease.In R. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement, and management (pp. 119–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L., Bonitati, C., Lemke, J., & Horii, Y. (1994). Voice treatment for patients with Parkinson disease: Development of an approach and preliminary efficacy data.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 2, 191–209.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L., Countryman, S., O’Brien, C., Hoehn, M., & Thompson, L. (1996). Intensive speech treatment for patients with Parkinson disease: Short- and long-term comparison of two techniques.Neurology, 47, 1496–1504.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ramig, L., Countryman, S., Thompson, L., & Horii, Y. (1995). Comparison of two forms of intensive speech treatment for Parkinson disease.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 798–807.
      Google Scholar
    • Ramig, L., Sapir, S., Fox, C., & Countryman, S. (2001). Changes in loudness following intensive voice treatment (LSVT) in individuals with Parkinson’s disease: A comparison with untreated patients and normal age-matched controls.Movement Disorders, 16, 79–83.
      Google Scholar
    • Rosen, K., Kent, R., & Delaney, A. (2006). Parametric quantitative acoustic analysis of conversation produced by speakers with dysarthria and healthy speakers.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 395–411.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Sapir, S., Ramig, L., Hoyt, P., Countryman, S., O’Brien, C., & Hoehn, M. (2002). Speech loudness and quality 12 months after intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for Parkinson’s Disease: A comparison with alternative speech treatment.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 54, 296–303.
      Google Scholar
    • Sapir, S., Spielman, J., Ramig, L., Story, B., & Fox, C. (2007). Effects of intensive voice treatment (the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT]) on vowel articulation in dysarthric individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease: Acoustic and perceptual findings.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 899–912.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Sarno, M. (1968). Speech impairment in Parkinson’s disease.Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 49, 269–275.
      Google Scholar
    • Schulman, R. (1989). Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 295–312.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Sheard, C., Adams, R., & Davis, P. (1991). Reliability and agreement of ratings of ataxic dysarthric speech samples with varying intelligibility.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34, 285–293.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Theodoros, D., Thompson-Ward, E., Murdoch, B., Lethlean, J., & Silburn, P. (1999). The effects of the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Program on motor speech function in Parkinson disease following thalamotomy and pallidotomy surgery: A case study.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 157–160.
      Google Scholar
    • Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. (2004). Rate and loudness manipulations in dysarthria: Acoustic and perceptual findings.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 766–783.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Tschopp, K., & Beckenbauer, T. (1991). A comparison between the electrically reproduced loudness and the original loudness of speech at high levels.British Journal of Audiology, 25, 251–258.
      Google Scholar
    • Ward, E., Theodoros, D., Murdoch, B., & Silburn, P. (2000). Changes in maximum capacity tongue function following the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Program.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 331–335.
      Google Scholar
    • Watson, P., & Hughes, D. (2006). The relationship of vocal loudness manipulation to prosodic F0 and durational variables in healthy adults.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 636–644.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Weismer, G. (1984). Articulatory characteristics of Parkinsonian dysarthria: Segmental and phrase-level timing, spirantization, and glottal-supraglottal articulation.In M. R. McNeil, J. C. Rosenbek, & A. E. Aronson (Eds.), The dysarthrias: Physiology, acoustics, perception, management (pp. 101–130). San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
      Google Scholar
    • Weismer, G., & Laures, J. (2002). Direct magnitude estimates of speech intelligibility in dysarthria: Effects of a chosen standard.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 421–433.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Wohlert, A. (2004). Service delivery variables and outcomes of treatment for hypokinetic dysarthria in Parkinson disease.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 235–239.
      Google Scholar

    Additional Resources