ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Dec 2010

Lip Movement Exaggerations During Infant-Directed Speech

    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0005)

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Although a growing body of literature has indentified the positive effects of visual speech on speech and language learning, oral movements of infant-directed speech (IDS) have rarely been studied. This investigation used 3-dimensional motion capture technology to describe how mothers modify their lip movements when talking to their infants.

    Method

    Lip movements were recorded from 25 mothers as they spoke to their infants and other adults. Lip shapes were analyzed for differences across speaking conditions. The maximum fundamental frequency, duration, acoustic intensity, and first and second formant frequency of each vowel also were measured.

    Results

    Lip movements were significantly larger during IDS than during adult-directed speech, although the exaggerations were vowel specific. All of the vowels produced during IDS were characterized by an elevated vocal pitch and a slowed speaking rate when compared with vowels produced during adult-directed speech.

    Conclusion

    The pattern of lip-shape exaggerations did not provide support for the hypothesis that mothers produce exemplar visual models of vowels during IDS. Future work is required to determine whether the observed increases in vertical lip aperture engender visual and acoustic enhancements that facilitate the early learning of speech.

    References

    • Adamson, L. B., & Frick, J. E. (2003). The still face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm.Infancy, 4, 451–473.
      Google Scholar
    • Amano, S., Nakatani, T., & Kondo, T. (2006). Fundamental frequency of infants' and parents' utterances in longitudinal recordings.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1636–1647.
      Google Scholar
    • Andruski, J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1996). The acoustic structure of vowels in mothers' speech to infants and children.In T. Bunnell, & W. Idsardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1545–1548). Wilmington, DE: Alfred I. du Pont Institute.
      Google Scholar
    • Beckford Wassink, A., Wright, R. A., & Franklin, A. D. (2007). Intraspeaker variability in vowel production: An investigation of motherese, hyperspeech, and Lombard speech in Jamaican speakers.Journal of Phonetics, 35, 363–379.
      Google Scholar
    • Beckman, M. E., Edwards, J., & Fletcher, J. (1992). Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics.In G. J. Docherty, & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Segment, gesture, prosody (pp. 68–86). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Bernstein, L. E., Takayanagi, S., & Auer, E. T., Jr. (2004). Auditory speech detection in noise enhanced by lipreading.Speech Communication, 44, 5–18.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bernstein Ratner, N. (1986). Durational cues which mark clause boundaries in mother–child speech.Journal of Phonetics, 14, 303–309.
      Google Scholar
    • Bernstein Ratner, N., & Luberoff, A. (1984). Cues to post-vocalic voicing in mother–child speech.Journal of Phonetics, 12, 285–289.
      Google Scholar
    • Biringen, Z. C. (1987). Infant attention to facial expressions and facial motion.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 137–133.
      Google Scholar
    • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.12) [Computer program].Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
      Google Scholar
    • Brand, R. J., Baldwin, D. A., & Ashburn, L. A. (2002). Evidence for “motionese”: Modifications in mothers' infant-directed action.Developmental Science, 5, 72–83.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U. (2002, May24). What’s new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals.Science, 296, 1435.
      Google Scholar
    • Cho, T. (2005). Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3867–3878.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Chong, S. C. F., Werker, J. F., Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (2003). Three facial expressions mothers direct to their infants.Infant and Child Development, 12, 211–232.
      Google Scholar
    • Cohn, J. F., & Elmore, M. (1988). Effect of contingent changes in mothers' affective expression on the organization of behavior in 3-month-old infants.Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 493–505.
      Google Scholar
    • DeBoer, B. (2003). Emergence of sound systems through self-organization.In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & J. R. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form (pp. 177–198). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Dominey, P. F., & Dodane, C. (2004). Indeterminacy in language acquisition: The role of child directed speech and joint attention.Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 121–145.
      Google Scholar
    • Dromey, C., & Ramig, L. O. (1998). The effect of lung volume on selected phonatory and articulatory variables.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 491–502.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Fletcher, J. (1991). Articulatory kinematics of final lengthening.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 369–382.
      Google Scholar
    • Englund, K., & Behne, D. (2006). Changes in infant directed speech in the first six months.Infant and Child Development, 15, 139–160.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Erber, N. P. (1974). Effects of angle, distance, and illumination on visual reception of speech by profoundly deaf children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 99–112.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Erickson, D. (1998). Effects of contrastive emphasis on jaw opening.Phonetica, 55, 147–169.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Fairbanks, G. (1950). A physiological correlative of vowel intensity.Speech Monograph, 22, 390–395.
      Google Scholar
    • Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Bates, E., Thal, D., & Pethick, S. (1994). Variability in early communicative development.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(Serial No. 242)
      Google Scholar
    • Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech.Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 279–293.
      Google Scholar
    • Fernald, A., & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers' speech to newborns.Developmental Psychology, 20, 104–113.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants.Journal of Child Language, 16, 477–501.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Fromkin, V. (1964). Lip positions in American English vowels.Language and Speech, 7, 215–225.
      Google Scholar
    • Goffman, L., Smith, A., Heisler, L., & Ho, M. (2008). The breadth of coarticulatory units in children and adults.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1424–1437.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Gogate, L., & Bahrick, L. E. (2001). Intersensory redundancy and seven-month-old infants' memory for arbitrary syllable–object relations.Infancy, 2, 219–231.
      Google Scholar
    • Grant, K. W., & Seitz, P. (2000). The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1197–1208.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Grieser, D. L., & Kuhl, P. K. (1988). Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: Support for universal prosodic features in motherese.Developmental Psychology, 24, 14–20.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Hall, M. D., Green, J., Moore, C. A., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). Contribution of articulatory kinematics to visual perception of stop consonants.In P. K. Kuhl, & L. Crum (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Convention of the European Acoustics Association: Forum Acusticum and 137th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America (#4aSCb15). Woodbury, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
      Google Scholar
    • Harrington, J., Fletcher, J., & Roberts, C. (1995). Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction.Journal of Phonetics, 23, 305–322.
      Google Scholar
    • Jusczyk, P., Hohne, E., & Mandel, D. (1995). Picking up regularities in the sound structure of the native language.In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience issues in cross-language research (pp. 91–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Kaplan, P. S., Bachorowski, J.-A., Smoski, M. J., & Hudenko, W. J. (2002). Infants of depressed mothers, although competent learners, fail to learn in response to their own mother’s infant-directed speech.Psychological Science, 13, 268–271.
      Google Scholar
    • Katz, G. S., Cohn, J. F., & Moore, C. A. (1996). A combination of vocal F0 dynamic and summary features discriminates between three pragmatic categories of infant directed speech.Child Development, 67, 205–217.
      Google Scholar
    • Kemler Nelson, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Jusczyk, P. W., & Wright Cassidy, K. (1989). How prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning.Journal of Child Language, 16, 53–68.
      Google Scholar
    • Kent, R. D., & Murray, A. D. (1982). Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6, and 9 months.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 353–365.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kitamura, C., & Burnham, D. (1998). The infant’s response to maternal vocal affect.In C. Rovee-Collier (Ed.), Advances in infancy research (pp. 221–236). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
      Google Scholar
    • Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., & Lacerda, F. (1997, August1). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants.Science, 277, 684–686.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1982, December10). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy.Science, 218, 1138–1141.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory.In W. Hardcastle, & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 403–409). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
      Google Scholar
    • Lindblom, B. E. F., & Sundberg, J. E. F. (1971). Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 50, 1166–1179.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Liu, H. M., Kuhl, P. K., & Tsao, F. M. (2003). An association between mothers' speech clarity and infants' discrimination skills.Developmental Science, 6, F1–F10.
      Google Scholar
    • Locke, J. L. (1993). The child’s path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • MacLeod, A., & Summerfield, A. (1987). Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception by noise.British Journal of Audiology, 21, 131–141.
      Google Scholar
    • McRoberts, G. W., & Best, C. T. (1997). Accommodation in mean f0 during mother–infant and father–infant vocal interactions: A longitudinal case study.Journal of Child Language, 24, 719–736.
      Google Scholar
    • Mefferd, A. S., & Green, J. R. (2010). Articulatory-to-acoustic relations in response to speaking rate and loudness manipulations.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1206–1219.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Milenkovic, P. (2004). TF32 [Computer software].University of Wisconsin—Madison, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
      Google Scholar
    • Montgomery, A. A., & Jackson, P. L. (1983). Physical characteristics of the lips underlying vowel lipreading performance.The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 73, 2134–2144.
      Google Scholar
    • Moon, S.-J., & Lindblom, B. (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels.The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 96, 40–55.
      Google Scholar
    • Munhall, K., Jones, J., Callan, D., Kuratate, T., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2004). Visual prosody and speech intelligibility: Head movement improves auditory speech perception.Psychological Science, 15, 133–137.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulations of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers.In T. M. Field, & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 177–197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
      Google Scholar
    • Newborg, J. (2005). Battelle Developmental Inventory (2nd ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
      Google Scholar
    • Patterson, R. L., & Werker, J. F. (2003). Two-month-old infants match phonetic information in lips and voice.Developmental Science, 6, 191–196.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Payton, K., Uchanski, R., & Braida, L. (1994). Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1581–1592.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Svirsky, M. A., & Jordan, M. I. (1993). Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: A pilot “motor equivalence” study.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2948–2961.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1985). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing: I. Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 96–103.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Robb, M. P., Chen, Y., & Gilbert, H. R. (1997). Developmental aspects of formant frequency and bandwidth in infants and toddlers.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 49, 88–95.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Rosenblum, L. D., Johnson, J. A., & Saldaña, H. M. (1996). Visual kinematic information for embellishing speech in noise.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1159–1170.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Rvachew, S., Slawinski, E. B., Williams, M., & Green, C. (1996). Formant frequencies of vowels produced by infants with and without early onset otitis media.Canadian Acoustics, 24, 19–28.
      Google Scholar
    • Schulman, R. (1989). Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 295–312.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Slater, A., & Kirby, R. (1998). Innate and learned perceptual abilities in the newborn infant.Experimental Brain Research, 123, 90–94.
      Google Scholar
    • Smiljanic, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1677–1688.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Stern, D. N. (1985). Affect attunement.In J. D. Call, E. Galenson, & R. L. Tyson (Eds.), Frontiers of infant psychiatry, 2(pp. 3–14). New York, NY: Basic Books.
      Google Scholar
    • Stern, D. N., Spieker, S., Barnett, R. K., & MacKain, K. (1983). The prosody of maternal speech: Infant age and context related changes.Journal of Child Language, 10, 1–15.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Stevens, K. N. (2000). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Stevens, K. N., & House, A. S. (1955). Development of a quantitative description of vowel articulation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 401–493.
      Google Scholar
    • Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise.The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212–215.
      Google Scholar
    • Summerfield, Q. (1987). Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio–visual speech perception.In R. Campbell, & B. Dodd (Eds.), Hearing by eye (pp. 3–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Summerfield, Q., MacLeod, A. M., McGrath, M., & Brooke, N. M. (1989). Lips, teeth, and the benefits of lipreading.In A. W. Young, & H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 223–233). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Summers, W. V. (1987). Effects of stress and final-consonant noticing on vowel production articulatory and acoustic analyses.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 847–863.
      Google Scholar
    • Swanson, L. A., Leonard, L. B., & Gandour, J. (1992). Vowel duration in mothers' speech to young children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 617–625.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Tasko, S. M., & McClean, M. D. (2004). Variations in articulatory movement with changes in speech task.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 85–100.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation.Infancy, 7, 53–71.
      Google Scholar
    • Toda, S., & Fogel, A. (1993). Infant response to the still-face situation at 3 and 6 months.Developmental Psychology, 29, 532–538.
      Google Scholar
    • Trainor, L. J., Austin, C. M., & Desjardins, R. N. (2000). Is infant-directed speech prosody a result of the vocal expression of emotion?.Psychological Science, 11, 188–195.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Turner, G. S., Tjaden, K., & Weismer, G. (1995). The influence of speaking rate on vowel space and speech intelligibility for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1001–1013.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007). Do you speak E-NG-L-I-S-H? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech.Speech Communication, 17, 2–7.
      Google Scholar
    • van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2005). Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 1181–1186.
      Google Scholar
    • Wohlert, A., & Hammen, V. (2000). Lip muscle activity related to speech rate and loudness.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1229–1239.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources