ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Aug 2011

Supervised Home Training of Dialogue Skills in Chronic Aphasia: A Randomized Parallel Group Study

    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0204)

    Abstract

    Purpose

    The aim of this study was to prove the efficacy of supervised self-training for individuals with aphasia. Linguistic and communicative performance in structured dialogues represented the main study parameters.

    Method

    In a cross-over design for randomized matched pairs, 18 individuals with chronic aphasia were examined during 12 weeks of supervised home training. Intensive language training, assisted by an electronic learning device (B.A.Bar), was compared with nonlinguistic training. Language performance, communicative abilities, and cognitive abilities were controlled before and after each intervention and at follow-up. The language training was designed to facilitate dialogue skills as required in everyday life.

    Results

    Robust and specific improvements in the participants' linguistic and communicative abilities were obtained using B.A.Bar dialogue training but not with nonlinguistic training. The transfer to general linguistic and communicative performance remained limited when the whole group was considered. For 30%–50% of the participants, individual analysis revealed significant improvements in spontaneous language and general communicative skills. Furthermore, individual participants demonstrated significant improvements regarding standardized aphasia assessment and proxy rating of communicative effectiveness.

    Conclusion

    Supervised home training works. This study has proven that it is an effective tool for bolstering linguistic and communicative skills of individuals with aphasia.

    References

    • Aftonomos, L. B., Appelbaum, J. S., & Steele, R. D. (1999). Improving outcomes for persons with aphasia in advanced community-based treatment programs.Stroke, 30, 1370–1379.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Aschenbrenner, S., Tucha, O., & Lange, K. W. (2000). Regensburger Wortflüssigkeitstest [Regensburger Word Fluency Test]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
      Google Scholar
    • Basso, A. (2003). Aphasia and its therapy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Basso, A., & Caporali, A. (2001). Aphasia therapy or the importance of being earnest.Aphasiology, 15, 307–332.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bay, E. (2007). Basisparameter der Spontansprache: Eine Normierungsstudie für die Aphasiediagnostik [Basic parameter of spontaneous speech: A standardization study for assessment of aphasia]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, RWTH Aachen University
      Google Scholar
    • Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R., & Speechley, M. (2003). Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery.Stroke, 34, 987–993.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Blomert, L., Kean, M. L., Koster, C., & Schokker, J. (1994). Amsterdam Nijmegen Everyday Language Test: Construction, reliability and validity.Aphasiology, 8, 381–407.
      Google Scholar
    • Camp, C. J., Bird, M. J., & Cherry, K. E. (2000). Retrieval strategies as a rehabilitation aid for cognitive loss in pathological aging.In R. D. Hill, L. Buckman, & A. S. Neely (Eds.), Cognitive rehabilitation in old age (pp. 224–248). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Cherney, L. R., & Halper, A. S. (2008). Novel technology for treating individuals with aphasia and concomitant cognitive deficits.Topics in Stroke Rehabiliation, 15, 542–554.
      Google Scholar
    • Cherney, L. R., Halper, A. S., Holland, A. L., & Cole, R. (2008). Computerized script training for aphasia: Preliminary results.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 19–34.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Cherney, L. R., Patterson, J. P., Raymer, A., Frymark, T., & Schooling, T. (2008). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constrained-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1282–1299.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Choe, Y., Azuma, T., Mathy, P., Liss, J. M., & Edgar, J. (2007). The effect of home computer practice on naming in individuals with aphasia and verbal apraxia.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 407–421.
      Google Scholar
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Daneman, M. (1990). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 445–464.
      Google Scholar
    • Darley, F. L. (1982). Aphasia. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
      Google Scholar
    • Davis, G. A. (2007). Aphasiology: Disorders and clinical practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
      Google Scholar
    • Davis, G. A., & Wilcox, M. J. (1981). Incorporating parameters of natural conversation in aphasia treatment.In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (pp. 169–193). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
      Google Scholar
    • Doesborgh, S. J. C., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M. W., Dippel, D. W., Harskamp, F., Koudstaal, P. J., & Visch-Brink, E. G. (2004). Cues on request: The efficacy of Multicue, a computer program for wordfinding therapy.Aphasiology, 18, 213–233.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t.Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795–805.
      Google Scholar
    • Drew, R. L., & Thompson, C. K. (1999). Model-based semantic treatment for naming deficits in aphasia.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 972–989.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (Ruger, H. A., Bussenius, C. E., & Hilgard, E. R., Trans.). New York, NY: Dover Publications(Original work published 1885)
      Google Scholar
    • Enderby, P., & Petheram, B. (1992). Self-administered therapy at home for aphasic patients.Aphasiology, 6, 321–324.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Fink, R. R., Brecher, A., Schwartz, M., & Robey, R. R. (2002). A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: Evaluation of clinician-guided and partially self-guided instruction.Aphasiology, 16, 1061–1086.
      Google Scholar
    • Fink, R. B., Brecher, A., Sobel, P., & Schwartz, M. F. (2005). Computer-assisted treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia.Aphasiology, 19, 943–954.
      Google Scholar
    • Grande, M., Hussmann, K., Bay, E., Christoph, S., Piefke, M., Willmes, K., & Huber, W. (2008). Basic parameters of spontaneous speech as a sensitive method for measuring change during the course of aphasia.International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43, 408–426.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Härting, C., Markowitsch, H. J., Neufeld, H., Calabrese, P., Deisinger, K., & Kessler, J. (2000). Wechsler-Gedächtnistest—revidierte Fassung: WMS–R [German adaptation of revised Wechsler Memory Scale]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
      Google Scholar
    • Helm-Estabrooks, N., & Ramsberger, G. (1986). Aphasia treatment by telephone.Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 67, 51–53.
      Google Scholar
    • Holland, S. L., Frattali, C. M., & Fromm, D. S. (1999). Communicative Activities of Daily Living (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • Huber, W. (1990). Text comprehension and production in aphasia: Analysis in terms of micro- and macroprocessing.In Y. Joanette, & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage (pp. 154–179). New York, NY: Springer.
      Google Scholar
    • Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). AAT—Aachener Aphasie Test [Aachener Aphasia Test]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
      Google Scholar
    • Huber, W., Poeck, K., & Willmes, K. (1984). The Aachen Aphasia Test.In F. C. Rose (Ed.), Advances in neurology, Vol 42: Progress in aphasiology (pp. 291–303). New York, NY: Raven Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Huber, W., Springer, L., & Willmes, K. (1993). Approaches to aphasia therapy in Aachen.In A. L. Holland, & M. M. Forbes (Eds.), Aphasia treatment—World perspectives (pp. 55–86). San Diego, CA: Singular.
      Google Scholar
    • Katz, R. C., & Wertz, R. T. (1997). The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults.Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 493–507.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
      Google Scholar
    • Kiran, S. (2008). Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia treatment: Further evidence for semantic complexity.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1550–1568.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Linebarger, M., McCall, D., Virata, T., & Berndt, R. S. (2007). Widening the temporal window: Processing support in the treatment of aphasic language production.Brain and Language, 100, 53–68.
      Google Scholar
    • Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The Communicative Effectiveness Index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Loncke, F., Alves, M., & Meyer, L. (2006). B.A.Bar: The speaking barcode reader.Closing the Gap, 24, 1–4.
      Google Scholar
    • Mannheim, L. M., Halper, A. S., & Cherney, L. (2009). Patient-reported changes in communication after computer-based script training for aphasia.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 623–627.
      Google Scholar
    • Martin, N., Thompson, C., & Worrall, L. (2007). Aphasia rehabilitation: The impairment and its consequences. San Diego, CA: Plural.
      Google Scholar
    • Mortley, J., Wade, J., & Enderby, P. (2004). Superhighway to promoting a client-therapist partnership: Using the Internet to deliver word-retrieval computer therapy monitored remotely with minimal speech and language therapy input.Aphasiology, 18, 193–211.
      Google Scholar
    • Nobis-Bosch, R., Radermacher, I., & Springer, L. (2006). Supervised home training in aphasia by means of B.A.Bar—A single case study.Forum Logopädie, 2, 14–19.
      Google Scholar
    • Paul-Brown, D., Frattali, C. M., Holland, A. L., Thompson, C. K., & Caperton, C. J. (2003). Quality of Communication Life Scales. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
      Google Scholar
    • Petheram, B. (1996). Exploring the home-based use of microcomputers in aphasia therapy.Aphasiology, 10, 267–282.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Petheram, B., & Enderby, P. (2008). The role of electronic devices in the rehabilitation of language disorders.In B. Stemmer, & H. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp. 427–432). London, England: Elsevier.
      Google Scholar
    • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 160–226.
      Google Scholar
    • Porch, B. E. (1981). Porch Index of Communicative Ability (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Pulvermüller, F., & Berthier, M. L. (2008). Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis.Aphasiology, 22, 563–599.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Pulvermüller, F., Neininger, B., Elbert, T., Mohr, B., Rockstroh, B., Koebbel, P., & Taub, E. (2001). Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke.Stroke, 32, 1621–1626.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Raymer, A. M., Beeson, P., Holland, A., Kendall, D., Maher, L. M., Martin, N., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (2008). Translational research in aphasia: From neuroscience to neurorehabiliation.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 259–275.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Robey, R. (1998). A meta-analysis of clinical outcome in the treatment of aphasia.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 172–187.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Sarno, M. T. (1981). Recovery and rehabilitation in aphasia.In M. T. Sarno (Ed.), Acquired aphasia (pp. 485–529). New York, NY: Academic Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Schegloff, E. A. (2004). Putting the interaction back into dialogue. Open peer commentory.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 207–208.
      Google Scholar
    • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Schelling, D. (1997). Block-Tapping Test. Frankfurt, Germany: Swets Test Services GmbH.
      Google Scholar
    • Schlenck, C., & Schlenck, K. J. (1994). Beratung und Betreuung von Angehörigen aphasischer Patienten [Counseling family members of people with aphasia].Logos Interdisziplinär, 2, 90–97.
      Google Scholar
    • Schuell, H. M., Jenkins, J. J., & Jimenez-Pabon, E. (1964). Aphasia in adults: Prognosis and treatment. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
      Google Scholar
    • Seidler, V., Nobis-Bosch, R., Schultz, A., & Huber, W. (2011). The self-instructed use of the speech-generating device B.A.Bar in treatment of aphasia: A single case study.Sprache-Stimme-Gehör, 35, 36–42.
      Google Scholar
    • Springer, L. (2008). Therapeutic approaches in aphasia therapy.In B. Stemmer, & H. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp. 397–406). London, England: Elsevier.
      Google Scholar
    • Springer, L., Glindemann, R., Huber, W., & Willmes, K. (1991). How efficacious is PACE therapy when language systematic training is incorporated?.Aphasiology, 5, 391–399.
      Google Scholar
    • Stachowiak, F. J. (1993). Computer-based aphasia therapy with the Lingware/STACH system.In F. J. Stachowiak (Ed.), Developments in the assessment and rehabilitation of brain-damaged patients (pp. 353–380). Tuebingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
      Google Scholar
    • Sturm, W., Willmes, K., & Horn, W. (1993). Leistungsprüfsystem für 50-90jährige (LPS 50+) [German adaptation of Thurstone’s Primary Mental Ability Test]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
      Google Scholar
    • Ulatowska, H. K., & Olness, G. S. (2007). Pragmatics in discourse performance: Insights from aphasiology.Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 148–158.
      Google Scholar
    • Wallesch, C.-W., & Johannsen-Horbach, H. (2004). Computers in aphasia therapy: Effects and side-effects.Aphasiology, 18, 223–228.
      Google Scholar
    • Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
      Google Scholar
    • Youmans, G., Holland, A., Munoz, M. L., & Bourgeois, M. (2005). Script training and automaticity in two individuals with aphasia.Aphasiology, 19, 435–450.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (1994). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung [Test Battery of Attentional Performance]. Herzogenrath, Germany: Psytest.
      Google Scholar

    Additional Resources