No access
Research Article
April 2012

Infants Exposed to Fluent Natural Speech Succeed at Cross-Gender Word Recognition

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 55, Number 2
Pages 554-560

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the possibility that early signal-to-word form mapping capabilities are robust enough to handle substantial indexical variation in the realization of words.

Method

Two groups of 7.5-month-olds were tested with the Headturn Preference Procedure. Half of the infants were exposed to words embedded in passages spoken by their mothers and tested on lists of trained and novel isolated words spoken by their fathers. The other half of the infants were yoked pairs listening to unfamiliar speakers.

Results

In the test phase, infants listened longer to trained than to novel words, indicating that they successfully segmented the words from the passages. This result was not modulated by infants' familiarity with the speaker.

Conclusions

Under more naturalistic listening conditions, 7.5-month-olds exhibit the ability to recognize words in the face of substantial indexical variation regardless of whether speakers are familiar. This suggests that early word representations are, at least to some extent, independent of the speaker’s gender and may reflect sophisticated abstraction capabilities on the part of the infants, which would render extreme episodic models of early speech perception untenable. Additional research using similarly ecologically valid testing methods is called for to elucidate the precise nature of early word representations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Barker, B. A., & Newman, R. S. (2004). Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming. Cognition, 94, B45–B54.
Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Gooding, T. N., Orlando, C. B., & Quann, C. A. (2009). Development of phonological constancy: Toddlers' perception of native- and Jamaican-accented words. Psychological Science, 20, 539–542.
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707–729.
Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U. (2002, May 24). What’s new pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science, 296, 1435.
Church, B. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1994). Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 521–533.
Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647–3658.
Cutler, A. (2008). The abstract representations in speech processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1601–1619.
Cutler, A., Eisner, F., McQueen, J. M., & Norris, D. (2010). How abstract phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation. In Fougeron, C., Kühnert, B., D’Imperio, M., & Vallée, N. (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 10 (pp. 91–111). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Peña, M. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates. NeuroReport, 12, 3155–3158.
Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224–238.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.
Gregory, S. W. (1990). Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partner’s speech. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 237–251.
Houston, D. M. (1999). The role of talker variability in infant word representations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Houston, D. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2000). The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1570–1582.
Johnson, E. K., Westrek, E., Nazzi, T., & Cutler, A. (2011). Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience. Developmental Science, 14, 1002–1011.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1993). From general to language-specific capacities: The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 3–28.
Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1–23.
Jusczyk, P. W., Pisoni, D. W., & Mullennix, J. (1992). Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants. Cognition, 43, 253–291.
Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 262–268.
Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 1–15.
Kuhl, P. K. (1979). Speech perception in early infancy: Perceptual constancy for perceptually dissimilar vowel categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1168–1679.
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., & Lacerda, F. (1997, August 1). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277, 684–686.
McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 1113–1126.
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355–376.
Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42–46.
Palmeri, T. J., Goldinger, S. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of speaker’s voice and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 309–328.
Pardo, J. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382–2393.
Remez, R. E., Dubowski, K. R., Broder, R. S., Davids, M. L., Grossman, Y. S., Moskalenko, M., & Hasbun, S. M. (2011). Auditory-phonetic projection and lexical structure in the recognition of sine-wave words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 968–977.
Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12, 339–349.
Schmale, R., Cristià, A., Seidl, A., & Johnson, E. K. (2010). Developmental changes in infants' ability to cope with dialect variation in word recognition. Infancy, 15, 650–662.
Schmale, R., & Seidl, A. (2009). Accommodating variability in voice and foreign accent: Flexibility of early word representations. Developmental Science, 12, 583–601.
Seidl, A., & Johnson, E. K. (2006). Infant word segmentation revisited: Edge alignment facilitates target extraction. Developmental Science, 9, 566–574.
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3306–3316.
Singh, L. (2008). Influences on high and low variability on infant word recognition. Cognition, 106, 833–870.
Singh, L., Morgan, J. L., & White, K. S. (2004). Preference and processing: The role of speech affect in early spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 173–189.
Webb, J. T. (1972). Interview synchrony: An investigation of two speech rate measures in an automated standardized interview. In Pope, B., & Seigman, A. W. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 115–133). New York, NY: Pergamon.
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197–234.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 55Number 2April 2012
Pages: 554-560

History

  • Received: Dec 11, 2010
  • Accepted: Jul 30, 2011
  • Published in issue: Apr 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. infant speech perception
  2. word recognition
  3. lack of invariance
  4. indexical information
  5. exemplar representations

Authors

Affiliations

Marieke van Heugten
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Elizabeth K. Johnson [email protected]
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Notes

Correspondence to Elizabeth K. Johnson: [email protected]
Editor and Associate Editor: Anne Smith

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Advancements in phonetics in the 21st century: Infant speech development, Journal of Phonetics, 10.1016/j.wocn.2025.101425, 111, (101425), (2025).
  • Attending to talker characteristics: Word learning and recognition in monolingually- and multilingually-raised infants, Cognitive Development, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101508, 72, (101508), (2024).
  • Perceptual Learning of Dysarthria in Adolescence, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00231, 66, 10, (3791-3803), (2023).
  • Research Trends Regarding Language Development and Language Impairment of Infancy and Toddlerhood: From 2012 to 2021, Communication Sciences & Disorders, 10.12963/csd.22920, 27, 3, (445-467), (2022).
  • Naturalistic speech supports distributional learning across contexts, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.2123230119, 119, 38, (2022).
  • Navigating Accent Variation: A Developmental Perspective, Annual Review of Linguistics, 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-032521-053717, 8, 1, (365-387), (2022).
  • Quantifying Talker Variability in North‐American Infants' Daily Input, Cognitive Science, 10.1111/cogs.13075, 46, 1, (2021).
  • How pronunciation distance impacts word recognition in children and adults, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0008930, 150, 6, (4103-4117), (2021).
  • Impacts of acoustic‐phonetic variability on perceptual development for spoken language: A review , WIREs Cognitive Science, 10.1002/wcs.1558, 12, 5, (2021).
  • Contrasting behavioral looking procedures: a case study on infant speech segmentation, Infant Behavior and Development, 10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101448, 60, (101448), (2020).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share