No access
Research Article
December 2012

Linguistic Pattern Analysis of Misspellings of Typically Developing Writers in Grades 1–9

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 55, Number 6
Pages 1587-1599

Abstract

Purpose

A mixed-methods approach, evaluating triple word-form theory, was used to describe linguistic patterns of misspellings.

Method

Spelling errors were taken from narrative and expository writing samples provided by 888 typically developing students in Grades 1–9. Errors were coded by category (phonological, orthographic, and morphological) and specific linguistic feature affected. Grade-level effects were analyzed with trend analysis. Qualitative analyses determined frequent error types and how use of specific linguistic features varied across grades.

Results

Phonological, orthographic, and morphological errors were noted across all grades, but orthographic errors predominated. Linear trends revealed developmental shifts in error proportions for the orthographic and morphological categories between Grades 4 and 5. Similar error types were noted across age groups, but the nature of linguistic feature error changed with age.

Conclusions

Triple word-form theory was supported. By Grade 1, orthographic errors predominated, and phonological and morphological error patterns were evident. Morphological errors increased in relative frequency in older students, probably due to a combination of word-formation issues and vocabulary growth. These patterns suggest that normal spelling development reflects nonlinear growth and that it takes a long time to develop a robust orthographic lexicon that coordinates phonology, orthography, and morphology and supports word-specific, conventional spelling.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Apel, K. (2010). Kindergarten children’s initial spoken and written word learning in a storybook context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 440–463.
Apel, K., Wolter, J., & Masterson, J. (2006). Effects of orthotactic and phonotactic probabilities during fast mapping on 5-year-olds learning to spell. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 21–42.
Bahr, R. H., Silliman, E. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2009). What spelling errors have to tell about vocabulary learning. In Wood, C., & Connelly, V. (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 109–129). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ball, E. W. (1993). Assessing phonemic awareness. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 24, 130–139.
Berninger, V. W. (2009). Highlights of programmatic, interdisciplinary research on writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 69–80.
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163.
Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A. C., Yates, C. M., Swanson, H. L., & Abbot, R. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades. Reading and Writing, 6, 161–196.
Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2008). Why spelling is important and how to teach it effectively. In Jamieson, D. G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and literacy development. London, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Language and Literacy Research NetworkRetrieved from www.literacyencyclopedia.ca/pdfs/topic.php?toopld=228
Berninger, V. W., Garcia, N. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2009). Multiple processes that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In Troia, G. A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 15–74). New York, NY: Guilford.
Berninger, V. W., Nagy, W., Carlisle, J., Thompson, J., Hoffer, D., Abbott, S., & Aylward, E. (2003). Effective treatment for dyslexics in grades 4 to 6. In Foorman, B. (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 382–417). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Berninger, V. W., Raskind, W., Richards, T., Abbott, R. D., & Stock, P. (2008). A multidisciplinary approach to understanding developmental dyslexia within working memory architecture: Genotypes, phenotypes, brain, and instruction. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 707–744.
Berninger, V. W., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 23–52.
Berninger, V. W., Yates, C., Cartwright, A. C., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbot, R. D. (1992). Lower level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing, 4, 257–280.
Bourassa, D., & Treiman, R. (2003). Spelling in children with dyslexia: Analyses from the Treiman-Bourassa Early Spelling Test. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 309–333.
Bourassa, D., & Treiman, R. (2007). Linguistic factors in spelling development. In Jamieson, D. G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy. Retrieved from www.literacyencyclopedia.ca/pdfs/topic.php?toopld=228
Bourassa, D. C., Beaupre, J., & MacGregor, K. (2011). Fourth graders' sensitivity to morphological context in spelling. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 109–114.
Bourassa, D. C., & Treiman, R. (2001). Spelling development and disability: The importance of linguistic factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 172–181.
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.
Bruck, M., & Waters, G. (1988). An analysis of spelling errors of children who differ in their reading and spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 77–92.
Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.
Carlisle, J. F. (1996). An exploratory study of morphological errors in children’s written stories. Reading and Writing, 8, 61–72.
Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–332.
Carlisle, J. F. (2004). Morphological processes that influence learning to read. In Stone, C. A., Silliman, E. R., Ehren, B. J., & Apel, K. (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 318–339). New York, NY: Guilford.
Carlisle, J. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78–103). New York, NY: Guilford.
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–253.
Carlisle, J., & Katz, L. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words. Reading and Writing, 19, 669–693.
Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631–644.
Deacon, S. H. (2008). The metric matters: Determining the extent of children’s knowledge of morphological spelling regularities. Developmental Science, 11, 396–406.
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006a). Getting to the root: Young writers' sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language, 33, 401–417.
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006b). This turnip’s not for turning: Children’s morphological awareness and their use of root morphemes in spelling. British Journal of Development Psychology, 24, 567–575.
Deacon, S. H., & Dhooge, S. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children’s spelling. Reading and Writing, 23, 1055–1069.
Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., & Casselman-Bell, M. (2009). How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes? Reading Psychology, 30, 301–318.
Dixon, M., & Kaminska, Z. (2007). Does exposure to orthography affect children’s spelling accuracy? Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 184–197.
Ehri, L. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 311–338). London, England: Academic Press.
Garcia, N., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2010). Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1-6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites. Written Language and Literacy, 13, 61–99.
Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: Across linguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33, 621–659.
Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Green, L., McCutchen, D., Schwiebert, C., Quilan, T., Eva-Wood, A., & Juelis, J. (2003). Morphological development in children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 752–761.
Joshi, R. M., Treiman, R., Carreker, S., & Moats, L. C. (2008–2009). How words cast their spell. American Educator, 32, 6–43.
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.
Mazzocco, M. M. M. (1997). Children’s interpretation of homonyms: A developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 441–467.
Mazzocco, M. M. M., Myers, G. F., Thompson, L. A., & Desai, S. S. (2003). Possible explanations for children’s literal interpretations of homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 30, 879–904.
McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 431–444.
McCutchen, D., Francis, M., & Kerr, S. (1997). Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 667–676.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mitchell, P., Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2011). Variations among adults in their use of morphemic spelling rules and word-specific knowledge when spelling. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 119–133.
Moats, L. C. (1995). Spelling development, disability, and instruction. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Moats, L. C. (2001). Spelling disability in adolescents and adults. In Bain, A. M., Bailet, L. L., & Moats, L. C. (Eds.), Written language disorders: Theory into practice (2nd ed., pp. 43–75). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Moats, L. C. (2009). Teaching spelling to students with language and learning disabilities. In Troia, G. A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 269–289). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Moats, L., Foorman, B., & Taylor, P. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts high-risk fourth graders' writing. Reading and Writing, 19, 363–391.
Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. New York, NY: Routledge.
Olinghouse, N. G., & Santangelo, T. (2011). Generalizability of writing scores: One or multiple genres?. Unpublished manuscript
Olson, R., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In Berninger, V. W. (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues, 1(pp. 27–71). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.
Rabin, J., & Deacon, H. (2008). The representation of morphologically complex words in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 35, 453–465.
Reed, D. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49.
Rice, M. L., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1412–1431.
Richards, T. L., Aylward, E. H., Berninger, V. W., Field, K. M., Grimme, A. C., Richards, A. L., & Nagy, W. (2006). Individual fMRI activation in orthographic mapping and morpheme mapping after orthographic or morphological spelling treatment in child dyslexics. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19, 56–86.
Richards, T. L., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2009). fMRI activation differences between 11-year-old good and poor spellers' access in working memory to temporary and long-term orthographic representations. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 327–353.
Sangster, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2011). Development in children’s sensitivity to the role of derivations in spelling. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 133–139.
Sharp, A. C., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. E. (2008). The development of children’s orthographic knowledge: A microgenetic perspective. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 206–226.
Silliman, E. R. (2010). Language learning disability and individual differences: Can we see between the lines? Topics in Language Disorders, 30, 22–27.
Silliman, E. R., Bahr, R. H., & Peters, M. L. (2006). Spelling patterns in preadolescents with atypical language skills: Phonological, morphological, and orthographic factors. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 93–123.
Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Alternative uses of phonemic information in spelling. Review of Educational Research, 43, 115–137.
Tangel, D. M., & Blachman, B. A. (1992). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on kindergarten children’s invented spelling. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 233–261.
Tangel, D. M., & Blachman, B. A. (1995). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on the invented spelling of first-grade children: A one-year follow-up. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 153–185.
Treiman, R. (1991). Children’s spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 346–360.
Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. C. (2000). Children’s written and oral spelling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 183–204.
Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Spelling as statistical learning: Using consonantal context to spell vowels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 642–652.
Treiman, R., Kessler, B., Zevin, J. D., Bick, S., & Davis, M. (2006). Influence of consonantal context on the reading of vowels: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 1–24.
Turnbull, K., Deacon, S., & Kay-Raining Bird, E. (2011). Mastering inflectional suffixes: A longitudinal study of beginning writers' spellings. Journal of Child Language, 38, 533–553.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1989). The statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Verheyden, L., Van den Branden, K., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & De Maeijer, S. (2012). Translation skills and trade-off in young L2-learners' written narrations. In Fayol, M., Alamargot, D., & Berninger, V. (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, methods, and applications (pp. 181–212). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Introduction to this special issue: Vocabulary growth and reading skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 1–7.
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Swanson, E. A., Edmonds, M., & Kim, A. H. (2006). A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 528–543.
Windsor, J., Scott, C. M., & Street, C. K. (2000). Verb and noun morphology in the spoken and written language of children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1322–1336.
Wolter, J. A., Wood, A., & D’zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 286–298.
Wright, D. M., & Ehri, L. C. (2007). Beginners remember orthography when they learn to read words: The case of doubled letters. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 115–133.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 55Number 6December 2012
Pages: 1587-1599

History

  • Received: Dec 1, 2010
  • Revised: May 20, 2011
  • Accepted: Mar 6, 2012
  • Published in issue: Dec 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Key Words

  1. spelling
  2. triple word-form theory
  3. spelling errors
  4. nonlinear development

Authors

Affiliations

Ruth Huntley Bahr [email protected]
Elaine R. Silliman
Virginia W. Berninger
Michael Dow

Notes

Correspondence to Ruth Huntley Bahr: [email protected]
Editor: Janna Oetting
Associate Editor: Julie Dockrell

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • The Implications and Applications of Developmental Spelling After Phonics Instruction, Education Sciences, 10.3390/educsci15020195, 15, 2, (195), (2025).
  • Conducting a Fine-Grained Spelling Analysis to Intensify Reading Interventions for Elementary Students, Intervention in School and Clinic, 10.1177/10534512251316177, (2025).
  • Evaluating text quality: Teachers’ perceptions about pupils’ writing, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101444, 85, (101444), (2025).
  • Written text production in French-speaking children with and without developmental language disorder: Insight into syntactic errors, Reading and Writing, 10.1007/s11145-025-10637-9, (2025).
  • Est-ce qu’écrire sur un clavier aide les élèves présentant un Trouble Spécifique d’Apprentissage du Langage Écrit à améliorer leur orthographe ?Does writing on a keyboard help students with a Specific Written Language Learning Disability to improve their spelling?, Glossa, 10.61989/epzt0p92, 141, (50-69), (2024).
  • Spelling error analysis in young English language learners from a German background: A comparison of three literacy intervention programmes, Journal of the European Second Language Association, 10.22599/jesla.113, 8, 1, (131-147), (2024).
  • Assessing Writing Across Levels of Language to Identify Instructional Needs, Intervention in School and Clinic, 10.1177/10534512241289921, 60, 3, (141-149), (2024).
  • Spelling Errors in Children With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss: Relations to Linguistic and Audiologic Factors, Exceptional Children, 10.1177/00144029241254100, 91, 1, (41-56), (2024).
  • Coordinating Multiple Language Levels in Writing, Topics in Language Disorders, 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000339, 44, 2, (111-130), (2024).
  • More than spelling accuracy, Multilingual Acquisition and Learning, 10.1075/sibil.67.22bah, (586-612), (2024).
  • See more

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share