Poorer Phonetic Perceivers Show Greater Benefit in Phonetic-Phonological Speech Learning


    Previous research has demonstrated that native English speakers can learn lexical tones in word context (pitch-to-word learning), to an extent. However, learning success depends on learners' pre-training sensitivity to pitch patterns. The aim of this study was to determine whether lexical pitch-pattern training given before lexical training could improve learning and whether or not the extent of improvement depends on pre-training pitch-pattern sensitivity.


    Learners with high and low pitch-pattern sensitivity were given training on lexical pitch patterns before lexical training.


    It was found that such training resulted in better learning than lexical training alone, primarily in learners with low pre-training pitch-pattern sensitivity.


    These data support the importance of considering individual aptitudes when developing training and also the notion of phonetic–phonological–lexical continuity in word learning.


    • Cooper, A., & Wang, Y. (2011). The influence of tonal awareness and musical experience on tone word learning. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 512–515). Hong Kong, SAR, China: ICPhS.
    • Golestani, N., & Zatorre, R. J. (2009). Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology.Brain and Language, 109, 55–67.
    • Ho, C. S-H., Chan, D. W., Tsang, S-M., Lee, S-H., & Chung, K. K. H. (2006). Word learning deficit among Chinese dyslexic children.Journal of Child Language, 33, 145–161.
    • Hu, C. (2003). Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning.Language Learning, 53, 429–462.
    • Hu, C-F., & Catts, H. W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese.Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 55–79.
    • Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y. Y., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 461–472.
    • Shih, C. (1988). Tone and intonation in Mandarin.Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 3, 83–109.
    • So, D., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). Learning to read Chinese: Semantic, syntactic, phonological and working memory skills in normally achieving and poor Chinese readers.Reading and Writing, 9, 1–21.
    • Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F.1997 , July24Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks.Nature, 388, 381–382.
    • Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A “rationalized” arcsine transform.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455–462.
    • Thistlethwaite, D. (1951). A critical review of latent learning and related experiments.Psychological Bulletin, 48, 97–129.
    • Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3649–3658.
    • Werker, J. F., & Stager, C. L. (2000). Developmental changes in infant speech perception and early word learning: Is there a link?.In M. Broe, & J. Pierre-Humbert, Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5 (pp. 181–193). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wong, P. C. M., & Perrachione, T. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults.Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565–585.

    Additional Resources