ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchSupplement Article1 Dec 2013

Interspeaker Variability in Hard Palate Morphology and Vowel Production

    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0211)

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Differences in vocal tract morphology have the potential to explain interspeaker variability in speech production. The potential acoustic impact of hard palate shape was examined in simulation, in addition to the interplay among morphology, articulation, and acoustics in real vowel production data.

    Method

    High-front vowel production from 5 speakers of American English was examined using midsagittal real-time magnetic resonance imaging data with synchronized audio. Relationships among hard palate morphology, tongue shaping, and formant frequencies were analyzed. Simulations were performed to determine the acoustical properties of vocal tracts whose area functions are altered according to prominent hard palate variations.

    Results

    Simulations revealed that altering the height and position of the palatal dome alters formant frequencies. Examinations of real speech data showed that palatal morphology is not significantly correlated with any formant frequency but is correlated with major aspects of lingual articulation.

    Conclusion

    Certain differences in hard palate morphology can substantially affect vowel acoustics, but those effects are not noticeable in real speech. Speakers adapt their lingual articulation to accommodate palate shape differences with the potential to substantially affect formant frequencies, while ignoring palate shape differences with relatively little acoustic impact, lending support for acoustic goals of vowel production.

    References

    • Arens, R., McDonough, J., Corbin, A., Hernandez, M., Maislin, G., Schwab, R., & Pack, A. I. (2002). Linear dimensions of the upper airway structure during development assessment by magnetic resonance imaging.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 165, 117–122.
      Google Scholar
    • Baum, S., & McFarland, D. (1997). The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2353–2359.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Bresch, E., Nielsen, J., Nayak, K., & Narayanan, S. (2006). Synchronized and noise-robust audio recordings during realtime MRI scans.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 1791–1794.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Brunner, J., Fuchs, S., & Perrier, P. (2005). The influence of the palate shape on articulatory token-to-token variability.ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 42, 43–67. Retrieved from www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/fileadmin/material/ZASPiL_Volltexte/zp42/zaspil42-fuchs-perrier-brunner.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Brunner, J., Fuchs, S., & Perrier, P. (2009). On the relationship of palate shape and articulatory behavior.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3936–3949.
      Google Scholar
    • Brunner, J., Hoole, P., & Perrier, P. (2007). Articulatory optimisation in perturbed vowel articulation.In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 497–500. Retrieved from www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1408/1408.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Chiba, T., & Kajiyama, M. (1941). The vowel—Its nature and structure. Tokyo, Japan: Kaiseikan.
      Google Scholar
    • Dart, S. (1991). Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations.Working Papers in Phonetics (Vol. 79). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Department of Linguistics.
      Google Scholar
    • Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
      Google Scholar
    • Fant, G. (1966). A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform f-pattern scalings.Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Status Report, 7(4), 22–30.
      Google Scholar
    • Fant, G. (1975). Non-uniform vowel normalization.Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Status Report, 16(2–3), 1–19.
      Google Scholar
    • Fitch, W., & Giedd, J. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1511–1522.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Fuchs, S., Winkler, R., & Perrier, P. (2008). Do speakers' vocal tract geometries shape their articulatory vowel space?.In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Speech Production. 333–336. Retrieved from http://issp2008.loria.fr/Proceedings/PDF/issp2008-77.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Honda, M., Fujino, A., & Kaburagi, T. (2002). Compensatory responses of articulators to unexpected perturbation of the palate shape.Journal of Phonetics, 30, 281–302.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Jackson, M.-T., & McGowan, R. (2012). A study of high front vowels with articulatory data and acoustic simulations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 3017–3035.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kay, S. (1988). Modern spectral estimation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
      Google Scholar
    • Kelly, J. L., & Lochbaum, C. C. (1962, September). Speech synthesis.Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Acoustics. Copenhagen1–4.
      Google Scholar
    • King, E. (1952). A roentgenographic study of pharyngeal growth.Angle Orthodontist, 22, 23–37.
      Google Scholar
    • Lammert, A., Proctor, M., Katsamanis, A., & Narayanan, S. (2011). Morphological variation in the adult vocal tract: A modeling study of its potential acoustic impact.In Proceedings of Interspeech. 2813–2816. Retrieved from http://sail.usc.edu/aigaion2/index.php/publications/show/453
      Google Scholar
    • Lammert, A., Proctor, M., & Narayanan, S. (2011). Morphological variation in the adult vocal tract: A study using rtMRI.In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Speech Production. 309–410. Retrieved from http://sail.usc.edu/aigaion2/index.php/publications/show/441
      Google Scholar
    • Lammert, A., Proctor, M., & Narayanan, S. (2013). Morphological variation in the adult hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 521–530.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Lee, S., Potamianos, A., & Narayanan, S. (1999). Acoustics of children's speech: Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1455–1468.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Maeda, S. (1979). Un modèle articulatoire de la langue avec des composantes lineaires [An articulatory model of the tongue with linear components].In 10ème Journées d'Etude sur la Parole (pp. 1–9). Grenoble, France: Groupement des Acousticiens de Langue Française.
      Google Scholar
    • Ménard, L., Schwartz, J.-L., Boë, L.-J., & Aubin, J. (2007). Articulatory–acoustic relationships during vocal tract growth for French vowels: Analysis of real data and simulations with an articulatory model.Journal of Phonetics, 35, 1–19.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Mooshammer, C., Perrier, P., Geng, C., & Pape, D. (2004). An EMMA and EPG study on token-to-token variability.Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung der Universität Kiel, 36, 47–63.
      Google Scholar
    • Narayanan, S., Bresch, E., Ghosh, P., Goldstein, L., Katsamanis, A., Kim, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2011). A multimodal real-time MRI articulatory corpus for speech research.In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH (pp. 837–840). Baixas, France: ICSA.
      Google Scholar
    • Narayanan, S., Nayak, K., Lee, S., Sethy, A., & Byrd, D. (2004). An approach to real-time magnetic resonance imaging for speech production.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1771–1776.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Nissen, S., & Fox, R. (2009). Acoustic and spectral patterns in young children's stop consonant productions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 1369–1378.
      Google Scholar
    • Nordström, P.-E. (1975). Attempts to simulate female and infant vocal tracts from male area functions.Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Status Report, 16(2–3), 20–33.
      Google Scholar
    • Öhman, S. (1967). Numerical model of coarticulation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 310–320.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Perkell, J. (1997). Articulatory processes.In W. Hardcastle, & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 333–370). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
      Google Scholar
    • Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175–184.
      Google Scholar
    • Proctor, M., Bone, D., Katsamanis, A., & Narayanan, S. (2010). Rapid semi-automatic segmentation of real-time magnetic resonance images for parametric vocal tract analysis.In Proceedings of Interspeech 2010. 1576–1579. Retrieved from http://sail.usc.edu/dbone/Proctor2010_Interspeech.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Rabiner, L., & Schafer, R. (1978). Digital processing of speech signals. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
      Google Scholar
    • Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Thibeault, M., Ménard, L., Baum, S., Richard, G., & McFarland, D. (2011). Articulatory and acoustic adaptation to palatal perturbation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 2112–2120.
      Google Scholar
    • Vorperian, H., & Kent, R. (2007). Vowel acoustic space development in children: A synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1510–1545.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Vorperian, H., Kent, R., Lindstrom, M. J., Kalina, C. M., Gentry, L. R., & Yandell, B. S. (2005). Development of vocal tract length during early childhood: A magnetic resonance imaging study.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 338–350.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Vorperian, H., Wang, S., Chung, M., Schimek, E., Durtschi, R., Kent, R., & Gentry, L. R. (2009). Anatomic development of the oral and pharyngeal portions of the vocal tract: An imaging study.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 1666–1678.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Vorperian, H., Wang, S., Schimek, E., Reid, B., Kent, R., Gentry, L., & Chung, M. K. (2011). Developmental sexual dimorphism of the oral and pharyngeal portions of the vocal tract: An imaging study.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 995–1010.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Winkler, R., Fuchs, S., & Perrier, P. (2006). The relation between differences in vocal tract geometry and articulatory control strategies in the production of French vowels: Evidence from MRI and modelling.In H. C. Yehia, D. Demolin, & R. Laboissière (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Seminar on Speech Production (pp. 509–516). Ubatuba, Brazil: CEFALARetrieved from http://scholar.google.de/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=de&user=DL_eBI0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=DL_eBI0AAAAJ:zYLM7Y9cAGgC
      Google Scholar
    • Winkler, R., Fuchs, S., Perrier, P., & Tiede, M. (2011). Speaker-specific biomechanical models: From acoustic variability via articulatory variability to the variability of motor commands in selected tongue muscles.In D. Ostry, S. R. Baum, L. Ménard, & V. L. Gracco (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Seminar on Speech Production (pp. 219–226). Montréal, Québec, Canada: UQAMRetrieved from http://scholar.google.de/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=de&user=DL_eBI0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=DL_eBI0AAAAJ:YsMSGLbcyi4C
      Google Scholar

    Additional Resources