No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Jun 2001

Training Volunteers as Conversation Partners Using "Supported Conversation for Adults With Aphasia" (SCA)

A Controlled Trial

    This article reports the development and evaluation of a new intervention termed "Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia" (SCA). The approach is based on the idea that the inherent competence of people with aphasia can be revealed through the skill of a conversation partner. The intervention approach was developed at a community-based aphasia center where volunteers interact with individuals with chronic aphasia and their families. The experimental study was designed to test whether training improves the conversational skills of volunteers, and, if so, whether the improvements affect the communication of their conversation partners with aphasia. Twenty volunteers received SCA training, and 20 control volunteers were merely exposed to people with aphasia. Comparisons between the groups’ scores on a Measure of Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia provide support for the efficacy of SCA. Trained volunteers scored significantly higher than untrained volunteers on ratings of acknowledging competence [F (1, 36)=19.1, p < .001] and revealing competence [F(1, 36)=159.0, p < .001] of their partners with aphasia. The training also produced a positive change in ratings of social [F(1, 36)=5.7, p < .023] and message exchange skills [F(1, 36)=17.6, p < .001] of individuals with aphasia, even though these individuals did not participate in the training. Implications for the treatment of aphasia and an argument for a social model of intervention are discussed.


    • Adair Ewing, S., & Pfalzgraf, B. (1991). Moving beyond stroke and aphasia [Video: Color; 28 min]. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
    • Bernstein-Ellis, E., & Elman, R. J. (1999). Aphasia group communication treatment: The Aphasia Center of California approach.In R. J. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician’s approach (pp. 47–56). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    • Boles, L. (1997). Conversation analysis as a dependent measure in communication therapy with four individuals with aphasia.Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing, 2, 43–61.
    • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
    • Byng, S., Pound, C., & Parr, S. (2000). Living with aphasia: A framework for therapy interventions.In I. Papathanasiou (Ed.), Acquired neurological communication disorders: A clinical perspective (pp. 49–75). London, U.K.: Whurr Publishers.
    • Clark, H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process.Cognition, 22, 1–39.
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Coles, R., & Eales, C. (1999). The aphasia self-help movement in Britain: A challenge and an opportunity.In R. J. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment of communication disorders: The expert clinician’s approach (pp. 107–114). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    • Damico, J., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Schweitzer, L. A. (1995). Addressing the third law of gardening: Methodological alternatives in aphasiology.In M. L. Lemme (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 23, pp. 83–93). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
    • Elman, R., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1999a). The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 411–419.
    • Elman, R., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1999b). Psychosocial aspects of group communication treatment: Preliminary findings.Seminars in Speech & Language, 20(1), 65–72.
    • Girolametto, L., Pearce, P. S., & Weitzman, E. (1996). Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1274–1283.
    • Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man.Research and Social Interaction (Special issue on co-construction), 28, 233–260.
    • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation.In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
    • Hickey, E., Rogers, M., & Olswang, L. (1995). Family based intervention for chronic aphasia. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Orlando, FL.
    • Jordan, L. (1998). Diversity in aphasiology: A social science perspective.Aphasiology, 12(6), 474–480.
    • Jordan, L., & Kaiser, W. (1996). Aphasia: A social approach. London: Chapman & Hall.
    • Kagan, A. (1995). Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals.Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2, 15–28.
    • Kagan, A. (1999). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and evaluation (unpublished dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto.
    • Kagan, A., & Cohen-Schneider, R. (1999). Groups in the “Introductory Program” at the Pat Arato Aphasia Centre.In R. J. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician’s approach (pp. 97–106). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    • Kagan, A., & Gailey, G. F. (1993). Functional is not enough: Training conversation partners for aphasic adults.In A. L. Holland & M. M. Forbes (Eds.), Aphasia treatment: World perspectives (pp. 199–225). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
    • Kagan, A., & Kimelman, D. Z. (1995). “Informed” consent in aphasia research: Myth or reality?.M. L. Lemme (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 23, pp. 65–75). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
    • Kagan, A., Winckel, J., & Shumway, E. (1995). Pictographic communication resources (manual). Toronto, Canada: The Aphasia Centre-North York.
    • Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery. New York: Grune & Stratton.
    • Le Dorze, G., & Brassard, C. (1995). A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases.Aphasiology, 9, 239–255.
    • Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82.
    • LPAA Project Group: Chapey, R., Duchan, J., Elman, R., Garcia, L., Kagan, A., Lyon, J., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2001). Life participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values.In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 235–245). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. (Originally published in The ASHA Leader, 5, Feb. 15, 2000).
    • Lyon, J. G., Cariski, D., Keisler, L., Rosenbek, J., Levine, R., Kumpula, J., Ryff, C., Coyne, S., & Blanc, M. (1997). Communication partners: Enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings.Aphasiology, 11, 693–708.
    • Milroy, L., & Perkins, L. (1992). Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: Toward a collaborative model.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 27–40.
    • Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (1994). Biostatistics: The bare essentials. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Ltd.
    • Parr, S. (1996). Everyday literacy in aphasia: Radical approaches to functional assessment and therapy.Aphasiology, 10, 469–479.
    • Parr, S., & Byng, S. (1998). Breaking new ground in familiar territory: A response to “Supported conversation for adults with aphasia” by Aura Kagan.Aphasiology, 12, 839–844.
    • Patterson, R., Paul, M., Wells, A., Hoen, B., & Thelander, M. (1994). Aphasia: A new life. Handbook for helping communities. Stoufville, Ontario, Canada: York-Durham Aphasia Centre.
    • Pound, C. (1997). Social model approaches to aphasia and disability. Paper presented at the Nontraditional Approaches to Aphasia Conference, Yountville, CA.
    • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation.Language, 50, 696–735.
    • Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings.American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.
    • Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis.Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101–114.
    • Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.Language, 53, 361–382.
    • Schiffrin, D. (1988). Conversation analysis.In F. L. Neumayer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey IV. Language: The sociocultural context (pp. 251–276). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
    • Simmons, N. N. (1993). An ethnographic investigation of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
    • Simmons, N. N., Kearns, K. P., & Potechin, G. (1987). Treatment of aphasia through family member training.In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings (Vol. 17, pp. 106–116). Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
    • Simmons-Mackie, N. (1998). In support of “Supported conversation for adults with aphasia.”.Aphasiology, 12, 831–838.
    • Simmons-Mackie, N. (2000). Social approaches to the management of aphasia.In L. Worrall & C. Frattali (Eds.), Neurogenic communication disorders: A funtional approach (pp. 162–187). New York: Thieme.
    • Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J. (1996). The contribution of discourse markers to communicative competence in aphasia.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 37–43.
    • Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J. S. (1995). Communicative competence in aphasia: Evidence from compensatory strategies.In M. L. Lemme (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 23, pp. 95–105). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
    • Tippett, D. C., & Sugarman, J. (1996). Discussing advance directives under the patient self-determination act: A unique opportunity for speech-language pathologists to help persons with aphasia.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 31–34.
    • World Health Organization. (1999). International classification of functioning and disability (ICIDH-2 beta2 version). Geneva, Switzerland: Author. (Update in December 2000:

    Additional Resources