Purpose

The purpose of this article is to conduct an evidence-based systematic review on the accuracy of pure-tone or otoacoustic emission (OAE) screening for identifying hearing loss in preschool- and school-age children.

Method

A systematic search of the literature published between 1975 and 2013 was conducted. Articles meeting the selection criteria were critically appraised for quality. Selection criteria required that behavioral thresholds be measured in children failing the screen and in at least a subset of children passing the screen. Sensitivity and specificity were used to calculate positive and negative likelihood ratios that could be compared between instruments.

Results

Eighteen studies were included in the final analysis. There was considerable variability among studies on stimulus levels, response criteria, and definition of hearing loss. Approximately half of positive and negative likelihood ratio pairs for OAEs (52%) and pure-tone screening (45%) were considered suggestive or informative for identifying hearing loss.

Conclusions

Both pure-tone and OAE screening can identify hearing loss in preschool- and school-age children. Studies that compared both tools in the same population concluded that pure-tone screening had higher sensitivity than OAE screening and thus was considered the preferred tool. Future research should incorporate standard stimulus levels, response criteria, and definitions of hearing loss.

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the EBSR.

References

  • American Academy of Audiology. (2011). American Academy of Audiology clinical practice guidelines: Childhood hearing screening. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/ChildhoodScreeningGuidelines.pdf
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2012). State hearing screening requirements. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/State-Hearing-Screening-Requirements.pdf
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2014). School-age hearing screening. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Advocacy/state/School-Age-Hearing-Screening/
  • Antia, S. D., Jones, P. B., Reed, S., & Kreimeyer, K. H. (2009). Academic status and progress of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in general classrooms.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14, 293–311.
  • Bamford, J., Fortnum, H., Bristow, K., Smith, J., Vamvakas, G., Davies, L., … Hind, S. (2007). Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen.Health Technology Assessment, 11(32), 1–168.
  • Bess, F. H., Dodd-Murphy, J., & Parker, R. A. (1998). Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: Prevalence, education performance and functional status.Ear and Hearing, 19, 339–354.
  • *Bienvenue, G. R., Michael, P. L., Chaffinch, J. C., & Zeigler, J. (1985). The AudioScope: A clinical tool for otoscopic and audiometric examination.Ear and Hearing, 6, 251–254.
  • Blake, M. L., Frymark, T., & Venediktov, R. (2013). An evidence-based systematic review on communication treatments for individuals with right hemisphere brain damage.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 146–160.
  • *Bu, X., Li, X., & Driscoll, C. (2005). The Chinese Hearing Questionnaire for school children.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16, 687–697.
  • Carney, A. E., & Moeller, M. P. (1998). Treatment efficacy: Hearing loss in children.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, S61–S84.
  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/index_guidance.htm
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
  • Cunningham, M., & Cox, E. O. (2003). Hearing assessment in infants and children: Recommendations beyond neonatal screening.Pediatrics, 111, 436–440.
  • Davis, J., Elfenbein, J., Schum, R., & Bentler, R. A. (1986). Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 53–62.
  • Dollaghan, C., & Horner, E. (2011). Bilingual language assessment: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1077–1088.
  • Dollaghan, C. A. (2007). Appraising diagnostic evidence. The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
  • *FitzZaland, R. E., & Zink, G. D. (1984). A comparative study of hearing screening procedures.Ear and Hearing, 5, 205–210.
  • Fortnum, H. M. (2003). Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment: Implications for neonatal hearing screening.Audiological Medicine, 1, 155–164.
  • Fortnum, H. M., Summerfield, A. Q., Marshall, D. H., Davis, A. C., & Bamford, J. M. (2001). Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: Questionnaire based ascertainment study.British Medical Journal, 323, 536–540.
  • *Georgalas, C., Xenellis, J., Davilis, D., Tzangaroulakis, A., & Ferekidis, E. (2008). Screening for hearing loss and middle-ear effusion in school-age children, using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: A feasibility study.Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 122, 1299–1304.
  • *Gershel, J., Kruger, B., Giraudi-Perry, D., Chobot, J., Rosenberg, M., Shapiro, I. M., … Shelov, S. (1985). Accuracy of the Welch Allyn AudioScope and traditional hearing screening for children with known hearing loss.The Journal of Pediatrics, 106, 15–20.
  • *Glattke, T. J., Pafatis, I. A., Cummiskey, C., & Herer, G. R. (1995). Identification of hearing loss in children and young adults using measures of transient otoacoustic emission reproducibility.American Journal of Audiology, 4(3), 71–86.
  • Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., & Dorn, P. A. (1999). DPOAE test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.Ear and Hearing, 20, 345–362.
  • *Grenner, J., Tideholm, B., Hinriksdóttir, I., & Carlborg, B. (1997). Hearing thresholds in four-year-old children with weak or no transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.Scandinavian Audiology, 26, 107–111.
  • *Halloran, D. R., Hardin, J. M., & Wall, T. C. (2009). Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 158–163.
  • *Harrison, W. A., & Norton, S. J. (1999). Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.Ear and Hearing, 20, 75–86.
  • *Hind, S. E., Atkins, R. L., Haggard, M. P., Brady, D., & Grinham, G. (1999). Alternatives in screening at school entry: Comparison of the Childhood Middle Ear Disease and Hearing Questionnaire (CMEDHQ) and the pure tone sweep test.British Journal of Audiology, 33, 403–414.
  • Holden-Pitt, L., & Diaz, J. A. (1998). Thirty years of the Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children and Youth: A glance over the decades.American Annals of the Deaf, 143, 71–76.
  • Holt, J. A., Traxler, C. B., & Allen, T. E. (1997). Interpreting the scores: A user's guide to the 9th edition Stanford achievement test for students who are deaf or hard of hearing (Technical Report No. 97-1). Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
  • *McPherson, B., & Smyth, V. (1997). Hearing screening for children with otitis media using otoacoustic emission measures.Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 2, 69–82.
  • Muñoz, K., Caballero, A., & White, K. (2014). Effectiveness of questionnaires for screening hearing of school-age children: A comprehensive literature review.International Journal of Audiology, 53, 910–914.
  • New Zealand Health Technology Assessment. (1998). Screening programmes for the detection of otitis media with effusion and conductive hearing loss in pre-school and new entrant school children: A critical appraisal of the literature (Report No. 3). Christchurch, New Zealand: Author.
  • Olusanya, B. (2001). Early detection of hearing impairment in a developing country: What options?.Audiology, 40, 141–147.
  • *Orlando, M., & Frank, T. (1987). Audiometer and audioscope hearing screening compared with threshold test in young children.Clinical and Laboratory Observations, 110, 261–263.
  • Pirozzo, S., Papinczak, T., & Glasziou, P. (2003). Whispered voice test for screening for hearing impairment in adults and children: Systematic review.British Medical Journal, 327, 967.
  • *Richardson, M. P., Willamson, T. J., Lenton, S. W., Tarlow, M. J., & Rudd, P. T. (1995). Otoacoustic emissions as a screening test for hearing impairment in children.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 72, 294–297.
  • Ritchie, B. C., & Merklein, R. A. (1972). An evaluation of the efficiency of the Verbal Auditory Screening for Children (VASC).Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 280–286.
  • *Sabo, M. P., Winston, R., & Macias, J. D. (2000). Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population.American Journal of Otology, 21, 88–91.
  • Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G. H., & Tugwell, P. (1991). Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Sanford, C. A., Schooling, T., & Frymark, T. (2012). Determining the presence or absence of middle ear disorders: An evidence-based systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of selected assessment instruments.American Journal of Audiology, 21, 251–268.
  • *Sekhar, D. L., Rhoades, J. A., Longnecker, A. L., Beiler, J. S., King, T. S., Widome, M. D., & Paul, I. M. (2011). Improving detection of adolescent hearing loss.Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 165, 1094–1100.
  • *Śliwa, L., Hatzopoulos, S., Kochanek, K., Piłka, A., Senderski, A., & Skarżyński, P. H. (2011). A comparison of audiometric and objective methods in hearing screening of school children. A preliminary study.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 75, 483–488.
  • *Thakur, J. S., Chauhan, I., Mohindroo, N. K., Sharma, D. R., Azad, R. K., & Vasanthalakshmi, M. S. (2013). Otoacoustic emissions in otitis media with effusion: Do they carry any clinical significance?.Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 65, 29–33.
  • Watkin, P., & Baldwin, M. (2012). The longitudinal follow up of a universal neonatal hearing screen: The implications for confirming deafness in childhood.International Journal of Audiology, 51, 519–528.
  • *Westerberg, B. D., Skowronski, D. M., Stewart, I. F., Stewart, L., Bernauer, M., & Mudarikwa, L. (2005). Prevalence of hearing loss in primary school children in Zimbabwe.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 69, 517–525.

Additional Resources