No AccessAmerican Journal of Speech-Language PathologyReview Article1 May 2015

Assessment and Treatment of Cognition and Communication Skills in Adults With Acquired Brain Injury via Telepractice: A Systematic Review


    This is a systematic review of assessment and treatment of cognitive and communicative abilities of individuals with acquired brain injury via telepractice versus in person. The a priori clinical questions were informed by previous research that highlights the importance of considering any functional implications of outcomes, determining disorder- and setting-specific concerns, and measuring the potential impact of diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy data on interpretation of findings.


    A literature search of multiple databases (e.g., PubMed) was conducted using key words and study inclusion criteria associated with the clinical questions.


    Ten group studies were accepted that addressed assessment of motor speech, language, and cognitive impairments; assessment of motor speech and language activity limitations/participation restrictions; and treatment of cognitive impairments and activity limitations/participation restrictions. In most cases, equivalence of outcomes was noted across service delivery methods.


    Limited findings, lack of diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy data, and heterogeneity of assessments and interventions precluded robust evaluation of clinical implications for telepractice equivalence and the broader area of telepractice efficacy. Future research is needed that will build upon current knowledge through replication. In addition, further evaluation at the impairment and activity limitation/participation restriction levels is needed.

    Supplemental Material

    References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review. The in-text citations to studies selected for the systematic review are not preceded by asterisks.


    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Telepractice (Practice Portal). Retrieved September 13, 2014 from
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Survey report on telepractice use among audiologists and speech-language pathologists. Retrieved from
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2012). 2012 schools survey report: SLP workforce/work conditions. Retrieved from
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2013). ASHA SLP Health Care Survey 2013: Caseload characteristics. Retrieved from
    • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2014). 2014 SIG 18 telepractice services survey report. Retrieved from
    • Analyse-it Software. (2009). Analyse-it for Microsoft Excel (Version 2.20) [Computer software].Leeds, United Kingdom: Author. Retrieved from
    • Andelic, N., Ye, J., Tomas, S., Roe, C., Lu, J., Bautz-Holter, E., … Aas, E. (2014). Cost-effectiveness analysis of an early-initiated, continuous chain of rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury.Journal of Neurotrauma, 31, 1–8.
    • Bilbao, A., Kennedy, C., Chatterji, S., Üstün, B., Barquero, J. L. V., & Barth, J. T. (2003). The ICF: Applications of the WHO model of functioning, disability, and health to brain injury rehabilitation.NeuroRehabilitation, 18, 239–250.
    • Brain Injury Association of America. (2012). Brain injury facts: Brain injury statistics [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from
    • Cherney, L., Patterson, J. P., Raymer, A., Frymark, T., & Schooling, T. (2008). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1282–1299.
    • Cullen, N., Chundamala, J., Bayley, M., & Jutai, J. (2007). The efficacy of acquired brain injury rehabilitation.Brain Injury, 21, 113–132.
    • Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia Battery for Adults (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
    • Dykstra, A. D., Hakel, M. E., & Adams, S. G. (2007). Application of the ICF in reduced speech intelligibility in dysarthria.Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 301–311.
    • Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543–549.
    • Fey, M. E., & Finestack, L. H. (2009). Research and development in child language intervention: A five-phase model.In R. G. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of child language disorders (pp. 513–531). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    • Gemmill, J. (2005). Network basics for telemedicine.Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 11, 71–76.
    • *Georgeadis, A. C., Brennan, D. M., Barker, L. M., & Baron, C. R. (2004). Telerehabilitation and its effect on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders.Aphasiology, 18, 639–652.
    • Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    • Hall, N., Boisvert, M., & Steele, R. (2013). Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: A systematic review.International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 5, 27–37.
    • Hengst, J. A., & Duff, M. C. (2007). Clinicians as communication partners: Developing a mediated discourse elicitation protocol.Topics in Language Disorders, 27, 37–49.
    • Hicks, L. L., Fleming, D. A., & Desaulnier, A. (2009). The application of remote monitoring to improve health outcomes to a rural area.Telemedicine and e-Health, 15, 664–671.
    • Hill, A., & Theodoros, D. (2002). Research in telehealth applications in speech-language pathology.Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 8, 187–196.
    • *Hill, A. J., Theodoros, D. G., Russell, T. G., & Ward, E. C. (2009a). The redesign and re-evaluation of an Internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of dysarthria in adults.Telemedicine and e-Health, 15, 840–850.
    • *Hill, A. J., Theodoros, D. G., Russell, T. G., & Ward, E. C. (2009b). Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults.International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 731–747.
    • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    • Keck, C., & Doarn, C. (2014). Telehealth technology applications in speech-language pathology.Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 20, 653–659.
    • Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The Functional Independence Measure: A new tool for rehabilitation.Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 6–18.
    • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
    • Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.
    • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration.Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, W-65–W-94.
    • MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse.Aphasiology, 25, 1286–1307.
    • Mair, F., & Whitten, P. (2000). Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine.BMJ, 320, 1517–1520.
    • *Man, D. W. K., Tam, S. S. F., & Hui-Chan, C. W. Y. (2006). A randomized clinical trial study on the effectiveness of a tele-analogy–based problem-solving programme for people with acquired brain injury (ABI).NeuroRehabilitation, 21, 205–217.
    • Mashima, P. A., & Doarn, C. R. (2008). Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology.Telehealth Activities in Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 1101–1117.
    • McCue, M., Fairman, A., & Pramuka, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation.Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21, 195–205.
    • McNeil, M., Doyle, P., Fossett, T., Park, G., & Goda, A. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure.Aphasiology, 15, 991–1006.
    • Mullen, R. (2004). Evidence for whom? ASHA's National Outcomes Measurement System.Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 413–417.
    • Mullen, R. (2007). The state of the evidence: ASHA develops levels of evidence for communication sciences and disorders.The ASHA Leader, 12(3), 8–9, 24–25.
    • National Telecommunications and Information Administration & Economics and Statistics Administration. (2014). Exploring the digital nation: America's emerging online experience. Retrieved from
    • Nelson, E., & Palsbo, S. (2006). Challenges in telemedicine equivalence studies.Evaluation and Program Planning, 29, 419–425.
    • *Palsbo, S. E. (2007). Equivalence of functional communication assessment in speech pathology using videoconferencing.Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 13, 40–43.
    • Perdices, M., Schultz, R., Tate, R., McDonald, S., Togher, L., Savage, S., … Smith, K. (2006). The evidence base of neuropsychological rehabilitation in acquired brain impairment (ABI): How good is the research?.Brain Impairment, 7, 119–132.
    • Randolph, C. (2001). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (1st ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
    • Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1996). Theoretical, methodological and validated bases of the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery.In I. Grant, & K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological Assessment of Neuropsychological Disorders (pp. 3–42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Reynolds, A. L., Vick, J. L., & Haak, N. J. (2009). Telehealth applications in speech-language pathology: A modified narrative review.Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 15, 310–316.
    • Reynolds, C. R., & Voress, J. K. (2007). Test of Memory and Learning (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
    • *Riegler, L. J., Neils-Strunjas, J., Boyce, S., Wade, S. L., & Scheifele, P. M. (2013). Cognitive intervention results in web-based videophone treatment adherence and improved cognitive scores.Medical Science Monitor, 19, 269–275.
    • Rietdijk, R., Togher, L., & Power, E. (2012). Supporting family members of people with traumatic brain injury using telehealth: A systematic review.Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 913–921.
    • Rispoli, M. J., Machalicek, W., & Lang, R. (2010). Communication interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury.Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 141–151.
    • Scarponi, F., Sattin, D., Leonardi, M., Raggi, A., & Zampolini, M. (2009). The description of severe traumatic brain injury in light of ICF classification.Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(Suppl. 1), S134–S143.
    • Simmons-Mackie, N., & Kagan, A. (2007). Application of ICF in aphasia.Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 244–253.
    • *Smith, P. M., Illig, S. B., Fielder, R. C., Hamilton, B. B., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (1996). Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the Functional Independence Measure in patients with stroke.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 431–435.
    • Tate, R., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) scale.Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401.
    • Theodoros, D. (2008). Telerehabilitation for service delivery in speech-language pathology.Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 14, 221–224.
    • Theodoros, D. (2011). Telepractice in speech-language pathology: The evidence, the challenges, and the future.Perspectives on Telepractice, 1(1), 10–21.
    • *Theodoros, D., Hill, A., Russell, T., Ward, E., & Wootton, R. (2008). Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the Internet.Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 552–559.
    • *Theodoros, D., Russell, T. G., Hill, A., Cahill, L., & Clark, K. (2003). Assessment of motor speech disorders online: A pilot study.Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9(Suppl. 2), 66–68.
    • Tindall, L. R. (2012). The use of telepractice technology to provide speech and language services to persons aging with communication disorders.Perspectives on Gerontology, 17(3), 94–102.
    • Tindall, L. R., & Huebner, R. A. (2009). The impact of an application of telerehabilitation technology on caregiver burden.International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 1(1), 3–8.
    • Tindall, L. R., Huebner, R. A., Stemple, J. C., & Kleinert, H. L. (2008). Videophone-delivered voice therapy: A comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson's disease.Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 1070–1077.
    • Togher, L., Schultz, R., Tate, R., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Smith, K., … Savage, S. (2009). The methodological quality of aphasia therapy research: An investigation of group studies using the PsycBITE™ evidence-based practice database.Aphasiology, 23, 694–706.
    • Torsney, K. (2003). Advantages and disadvantages of telerehabilitation for persons with neurological disabilities.NeuroRehabilitation, 18, 183–185.
    • Tucker, J. K. (2012). Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: The qualitative view.International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4(2), 47–59.
    • *Turkstra, L. S., Quinn-Padron, M., Johnson, J. E., Workinger, M. S., & Antoniotti, N. (2012). In-person versus telehealth assessment of discourse ability in adults with traumatic brain injury.Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27, 424–432.
    • L. Turner-Stokes (Ed.). (2003). Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: National clinical guidelines. London, England: Royal College of Physicians & British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine.
    • Turner-Stokes, L., Disler, P. B., Nair, A., & Wade, D. T. (2005). Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005(3), 1–46. doi:10.1002/ 2
    • Wambaugh, J. L., & Mauszycki, S. C. (2010). Application of the WHO ICF to management of acquired apraxia of speech.Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 133–140.
    • Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W. S., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003, November10). The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3(1, Suppl.), 25. Retrieved from
    • Whitten, P., Doolittle, G., Mackert, M., & Rush, T. (2003). Telehospice carries end-of-life care over the lines.Nurse Management, 34, 36–39.
    • Winters, J. M., & Winters, J. M. (2004). A telehomecare model optimizing rehabilitation outcomes.Telemedicine and e-Health, 10, 200–212.
    • World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
    • Xue, S. A., & Lower, A. (2010). Acoustic fidelity of Internet bandwidths for measures used in speech and voice disorders.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 1366–1376.
    • Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1981). Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Additional Resources