No AccessLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in SchoolsResearch Article1 Jul 2015

Intelligibility in Context Scale: Normative and Validation Data for English-Speaking Preschoolers

    Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to describe normative and validation data on the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS; McLeod, Harrison, & McCormack, 2012c) for English-speaking children.

    Method

    The ICS is a 7-item, parent-report measure of children's speech intelligibility with a range of communicative partners. Data were collected from the parents of 803 Australian English-speaking children ranging in age from 4;0 (years;months) to 5;5 (37.0% were multilingual).

    Results

    The mean ICS score was 4.4 (SD = 0.7) out of a possible total score of 5. Children's speech was reported to be most intelligible to their parents, followed by their immediate family, friends, and teachers; children's speech was least intelligible to strangers. The ICS had high internal consistency (α = .94). Significant differences in scores were identified on the basis of sex and age but not on the basis of socioeconomic status or the number of languages spoken. There were significant differences in scores between children whose parents had concerns about their child's speech (M = 3.9) and those who did not (M = 4.6). A sensitivity of .82 and a specificity of .58 were established as the optimal cutoff. Test–retest reliability and criterion validity were established for 184 children with a speech sound disorder. There was a significant low correlation between the ICS mean score and percentage of phonemes correct (r = .30), percentage of consonants correct (r = .24), and percentage of vowels correct (r = .30) on the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (Dodd, Hua, Crosbie, Holm, & Ozanne, 2002). Thirty-one parents completed the ICS related to English and another language spoken by their child with a speech sound disorder. The significant correlations between the scores suggest that the ICS may be robust between languages.

    Conclusions

    This article provides normative ICS data for English-speaking children and additional validation of the psychometric properties of the ICS. The robustness of the ICS was suggested because mean ICS scores were not affected by socioeconomic status, number of languages spoken, or whether the ICS was completed in relation to English or another language. The ICS is recommended as a screening measure of children's speech intelligibility.

    References

    • Allen, C. M., Nikolopoulos, T. P., Dyar, D., & O'Donoghue, G. M. (2001). Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation.Otology and Neurotology, 22, 631–633.
    • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). An introduction to Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) 2006. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Author.
    • Coplan, J., & Gleason, J. R. (1988). Unclear speech: Recognition and significance of unintelligible speech in preschool children.Pediatrics, 82, 447–452.
    • Crowe, K., & McLeod, S. (2014). A systematic review of cross-linguistic and multilingual speech and language outcomes for children with hearing loss.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17, 287–309. doi:10.1080/13670050.2012.758686
    • Dodd, B., Hua, Z., Crosbie, S., Holm, A., & Ozanne, A. (2002). Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology. London, England: Harcourt.
    • Ertmer, D. J. (2010). Relationships between speech intelligibility and word articulation scores in children with hearing loss.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1075–1086. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0250)
    • Ertmer, D. J. (2011). Assessing speech intelligibility in children with hearing loss: Toward revitalizing a valuable clinical tool.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 52–58. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0081)
    • Flipsen, P., Jr. (1995). Speaker–listener familiarity: Parents as judges of delayed speech intelligibility.Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 3–19.
    • Flipsen, P., Jr. (2006). Measuring the intelligibility of conversational speech in children.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20, 303–312. doi:10.1080/02699200400024863
    • Gay, L. R. (1985). Educational evaluation and measurement: Competencies for analysis and application (2nd ed.). Cleveland, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
    • Glascoe, F. P. (2000). Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status: Authorized Australian Version. Parkville, Victoria, Australia: Centre for Community Child Health.
    • Glascoe, F. P., & Dworkin, P. H. (2008). Surveillance and screening for development and behavior.In M. Wolraich, P. H. Dworkin, & D. D. Drotar (Eds.), Developmental–behavioral pediatrics: Evidence and practice (pp. 130–144). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby.
    • Hudgins, C. V., & Numbers, F. C. (1942). An investigation of the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf.In C. Murchison (Ed.), Genetic psychology monographs (pp. 289–392). Worchester, MA: Clark University.
    • Huttunen, K., & Sorri, M. (2004). Methodological aspects of assessing speech intelligibility among children with impaired hearing.Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 124, 490–494. doi:10.1080/00016480310000557
    • IBM. (2013). SPSS Statistics (Version 22.0) [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: Author.
    • Kent, R. D., Miolo, G., & Bloedel, S. (1994). The intelligibility of children's speech: A review of evaluation procedures.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 81–95. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0302.81
    • Kogovšek, D., & Ozbič, M. (2013). Lestvica razumljivosti govora v vsakdanjem življenju: slovenščina [Intelligibility in Context Scale: Slovenian].Komunikacija, 2(3), 28–34.
    • Lagerberg, T. B. (2013). Assessment of intelligibility in children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
    • Lagerberg, T. B., Hartelius, L., Johnels, J. Å., Ahlman, A.-K., Börjesson, A., & Persson, C. (2015). Swedish Test of Intelligibility for Children (STI-CH)—Validity and reliability of a computer-mediated single word intelligibility test for children.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 29, 201–215. doi:10.3109/02699206.2014.987925
    • Lousada, M., Jesus, L. M. T., Hall, A., & Joffe, V. (2014). Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech-sound disorders.International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49, 584–601. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12095
    • McLeod, S., & Harrison, L. J. (2009). Epidemiology of speech and language impairment in a nationally representative sample of 4- to 5-year-old children.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1213–1229. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0085)
    • McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., McAllister, L., & McCormack, J. (2013). Speech sound disorders in a community study of preschool children.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 503–522. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0123)
    • McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012a). Bağlam İçi Anlaşılabilirlik Ölçeği: Türkçe [Intelligibility in Context Scale: Turkish] (S. Topbaş, Trans.). Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics
    • McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012b). Escala de la Inteligibilidad en Contexto: Español [Intelligibility in Context Scale: Spanish] (R. Prezas, R. Rojas, & B. A. Goldstein, Trans.). Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics
    • McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012c). Intelligibility in Context Scale. Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics
    • McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012d). [Intelligibility in Context Scale: Korean] (J.-H. Kim, Trans.).Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia: Charles Sturt University. Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/research/multilingual-speech/ics
    • McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & McCormack, J. (2012e). Intelligibility in Context Scale: Validity and reliability of a subjective rating measure.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 648–656. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0130)
    • Messick, S. (1993). Validity.In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
    • Miller, N. (2013). Measuring up to speech intelligibility.International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48, 601–612. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12061
    • Monsen, R. B. (1981). A usable test for the speech intelligibility of deaf talkers.American Annals of the Deaf, 156, 845–852.
    • Most, T. (2007). Speech intelligibility, loneliness, and sense of coherence among deaf and hard-of-hearing children in individual inclusion and group inclusion.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 495–503. doi:10.1093/deafed/enm015
    • Most, T., Ingber, S., & Heled-Ariam, E. (2012). Social competence, sense of loneliness, and speech intelligibility of young children with hearing loss in individual inclusion and group inclusion.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17, 259–272. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr049
    • Ng, K. Y. M., To, C. K. S., & McLeod, S. (2014). Validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale as a screening tool for preschoolers in Hong Kong.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 28, 316–328. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.865789
    • Osberger, M. J., McConkey Robbins, A., Todd, S. L., & Riley, A. I. (1994). Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants.Volta Review, 96(5), 169–180.
    • Peña, E. D., Spaulding, T. J., & Plante, E. (2006). The composition of normative groups and diagnostic decision making: Shooting ourselves in the foot.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 247–254. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/023)
    • Thoroddsen, E. E. (2014). Mat barna með kuðungsígræðslu á eigin lífsgæðum: Tengsl lífsgæða við talskynjun og skiljanleika í tal [Quality of life for children with cochlear implants: Self-reported quality of life and its interrelation with speech perception and speech intelligibility] (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
    • Tomić, D., & Mildner, V. (2014, June). Validation of Croatian Intelligibility in Context Scale. Poster presented at the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden.
    • Verdon, S., McLeod, S., & McDonald, S. (2014). A geographical analysis of speech-language pathology services to support multilingual children.International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 304–316. doi:10.3109/17549507.2013.868036
    • Weismer, G. (2009). Speech intelligibility.In M. J. Ball, M. R. Perkins, N. Müller, & S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 568–582). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    • Weston, A. D., & Shriberg, L. D. (1992). Contextual and linguistic correlates of intelligibility in children with developmental phonological disorders.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1316–1332.
    • Wilcox, K., & Morris, S. (1999). Children's Speech Intelligibility Measure (CSIM). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments.
    • World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
    • Wren, Y., & Roulstone, S. (2013). Phoneme Factory Sound Sorter: Australian–English. Bristol, England: Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit.

    Additional Resources