ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in SchoolsTutorial1 Apr 2016

Using Language Sample Analysis to Assess Spoken Language Production in Adolescents

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_LSHSS-15-0051

    Abstract

    Purpose

    This tutorial discusses the importance of language sample analysis and how Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) software can be used to simplify the process and effectively assess the spoken language production of adolescents.

    Method

    Over the past 30 years, thousands of language samples have been collected from typical speakers, aged 3–18 years, in conversational and narrative contexts. These samples have been formatted as reference databases included with SALT. Using the SALT software, individual samples are compared with age- and grade-matched samples selected from these databases.

    Results

    Two case studies illustrate that comparison with database samples of typical adolescents, matched by grade and elicitation context, highlights language measures that are higher or lower than the database mean values. Differences in values are measured in standard deviations.

    Conclusion

    Language sample analysis remains a powerful method of documenting language use in everyday speaking situations. A sample of talking reveals an individual's ability to meet specific speaking demands. These demands vary across contexts, and speakers can have difficulty in any one or all of these communication tasks. Language use for spoken communication is a foundation for literacy attainment and contributes to success in navigating relationships for school, work, and community participation.

    References

    • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York, NY: Wiley.
      Google Scholar
    • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Initiative. (2015). English language arts standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
      Google Scholar
    • Donaldson, M. (1986). Children's explanations: A psycholinguistic study. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Hall-Mills, S., & Apel, K. (2015). Linguistic feature development across grades and genre in elementary writing.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 242–255.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
      Google Scholar
    • Heilmann, J. (2010). Myths and realities of language sample analysis.Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 17, 4–8.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Heilmann, J., & Malone, T. (2014). The rules of the game: Properties of a database of expository language samples.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45, 277–290.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Heilmann, J., Miller, J., Iglesias, A., Fabiano-Smith, L., Nockerts, A., & Digney Andriacchi, K. (2008). Narrative transcription accuracy and reliability in two languages.Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 178–188.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Heilmann, J., Miller, J., & Nockerts, A. (2010). Using language sample databases.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 84–95.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Heilmann, J., Nockerts, A., & Miller, J. (2010). Language sampling: Does the length of the transcript matter?.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 393–404.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Heilmann, J., & Westerveld, M. (2013). Bilingual language sample analysis: Considerations and technological advances.Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 87–93.
      Google Scholar
    • Leadholm, B., & Miller, J. (1992). Language sample analysis: The Wisconsin guide. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
      Google Scholar
    • Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers.
      Google Scholar
    • Long, S. (2015). Computerized Profiling [Computer software]. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University.
      Google Scholar
    • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you?: New York, NY: Dial Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Miller, J. (1982). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Miller, J. (1991). Quantifying productive language disorders.In J. Miller (Ed.), Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 211–231). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • J. Miller, K. Andriacchi, & A. Nockerts (Eds.) (2011). Assessing language production using SALT software: A clinician's guide to language sample analysis. Middleton, WI: SALT Software LLC.
      Google Scholar
    • Miller, J., Andriacchi, K., & Nockerts, A. (2013, July1). Analysis assistance: SLPs turn to language sample analysis software to document progress on the Common Core State Standards.Advance Healthcare Network for Speech and Hearing. Retrieved from http://speech-language-pathology-audiology.advanceweb.com/Features/Articles/Analysis-Assistance.aspx
      Google Scholar
    • Miller, J., Heilmann, J., Nockerts, A., Iglesias, A., Fabiano, L., & Francis, D. (2006). Oral language and reading in bilingual children.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 30–43.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) [Computer software]. Middleton, WI: SALT Software LLC.
      Google Scholar
    • Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, 1–135.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Nelson, N. W. (2014a). Classroom-based writing assessment.In A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & G. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy development and disorders (2nd ed., pp. 524–543). New York, NY: Guilford.
      Google Scholar
    • Nelson, N. W. (2014b). Integrating language assessment, instruction, and intervention in an inclusive writing lab approach.In B. Arfé, J. Dockrell, & V. Berninger (Eds.), Writing development in children with hearing loss, dyslexia, or oral language problems (pp. 273–300). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Nippold, M. (2014). Language sampling with adolescents: Implications for intervention (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
      Google Scholar
    • Paul, R. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
      Google Scholar
    • Piaget, J. (1926). Language and thought of the child. The Hague: Mouton.
      Google Scholar
    • Price, J., & Jackson, S. (2015). Procedures for obtaining and analyzing writing samples of school-age children and adolescents.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 46, 277–293.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Rojas, R., & Iglesias, A. (2010). Using language sampling to measure language growth.Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 17, 24–31.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Roskos, K., Tabors, P., & Lenhart, L. (2009). Oral language and early literacy in preschool: Talking, reading, and writing (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
      Google Scholar
    • SALT Software. (2015a). SALT expository database. Retrieved from http://saltsoftware.com/media/wysiwyg/reference_database/ExpoRDBDoc.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • SALT Software. (2015b). Summary of SALT transcription conventions. Retrieved from http://saltsoftware.com/media/wysiwyg/tranaids/TranConvSummary.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • SALT Software. (2015c). Subordination Index. Retrieved from http://saltsoftware.com/media/wysiwyg/codeaids/SI_Scoring_Guide.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • SALT Software. (2015d). Expository Scoring Scheme (ESS) guide. Retrieved from http://saltsoftware.com/media/wysiwyg/codeaids/ESS_Scoring_Guide.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • SALT Software. (2015e). SALT narrative story retell reference database. Retrieved from http://saltsoftware.com/media/wysiwyg/reference_database/NarStoryRetellRDBDoc.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • SALT Software. (2015f). Using SALT to access the Common Core. State standards for speaking and listening: Grades K–12. Retrieved from http://saltsoftware.com/media/wysiwyg/CCSS_grid.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Scott, C., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.
      LinkGoogle Scholar
    • D. Slobin (Ed.). (1985). The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Steig, W. (1982). Doctor De Soto. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
      Google Scholar
    • Thordardottir, E. (2015, June). French language samples: Does length matter?.Poster session presented at the meeting of the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI.
      Google Scholar
    • Tilstra, J., & McMaster, K. (2007). Productivity, fluency, and grammaticality measures from narratives: Potential indicators of language proficiency?.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29, 43–53.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Weir, R. (1962). Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.
      Google Scholar
    • Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2015). CCSS for literacy in all subjects. Retrieved from http://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/standards/pdf/las-stds.pdf
      Google Scholar

    Additional Resources