ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyResearch Note1 Oct 2016

Usability and Online Audiological Rehabilitation

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJA-16-0015

    Abstract

    Purpose

    This paper describes the results from the iterative development and usability testing of an online audiological rehabilitation (OAR) program. The OAR was based on previous experience with Internet interventions and OAR.

    Method

    The described OAR consisted of weekly learning modules, each of which had a specific topic and contained information and learning activities. A virtual coach, a trained audiologist, led the participants through the modules. The participants' feedback was collected using the “think-aloud” method in which the participants gave their feedback in a structured manner.

    Results

    The early findings from the first version of the OAR showed that participants had difficulty navigating the system. As a result of the usability testing, a second major edition of the OAR program was developed, and the participants found it easier to manage and that it enhanced the learning experience. The participants appreciated the testimonial videos as well as the option to study more in-depth material for a given subject.

    Conclusions

    The early findings from the usability test of the program provided useful information as to how content can be developed and delivered for optimal user accessibility within the scope of OAR.

    References

    • Andersson, G. (2014). The Internet and CBT: A clinical guide. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Cook, D. J., Moradkhani, A., Douglas, K. S. V., Prinsen, S. K., Fischer, E. N., & Schroeder, D. R. (2014). Patient education self-management during surgical recovery: Combining mobile (iPad) and a content management system.Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 20, 312–317.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new medical research council guidance.The BMJ, 337, a1655.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Elberling, C., & Worsøe, K. (2005). Fading sounds. Herlev, Denmark: Bording A/S.
      Google Scholar
    • Ferguson, M. A., Brandreth, M., Brassington, W., Leighton, P., & Wharrad, H. (2016). A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of a multimedia educational program for first-time hearing aid users.Ear and Hearing, 37, 123–136.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ferguson, M. A., Leighton, P. E., Brandreth, M., & Wharrad, H. J. (2012). Development of evidence-based interactive videos for first-time hearing aid users.International Journal of Audiology, 51, 262–263.
      Google Scholar
    • Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gregory, M. (2013). The Ida Institute toolbox: Tools to enhance collaborative self-management of hearing problems.SIG 7 Perspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation, 20, 22–36.
      Google Scholar
    • Hickson, L., Worrall, L., & Scarinci, N. (2007). A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment.Ear and Hearing, 28, 212–230.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Laplante-Lévesque, A., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Gagné, J. P. (2006). Providing an Internet-based audiological counseling program to new hearing aid users: A qualitative study.International Journal of Audiology, 45, 697–706.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning.Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 745–771.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Preminger, J. E. (2007). Issues associated with the measurement of psychosocial benefits of group audiologic rehabilitation programs.Trends in Amplification, 11, 113–123.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Rice, W. (2015). Moodle e-learning course development–third edition. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing.
      Google Scholar
    • Siegel, K. (2015). Adobe Captivate 9: The essentials workbook. Maineville, OH: IconLogic.
      Google Scholar
    • Thorén, E., Öberg, M., Wänström, G., Andersson, G., & Lunner, T. (2014). A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of online rehabilitative intervention for adult hearing-aid users.International Journal of Audiology, 53, 452–461.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Thorén, E., Svensson, M., Törnqvist, A., Andersson, G., Carlbring, C., & Lunner, T. (2011). Rehabilitative online education versus Internet discussion group for hearing aid users: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 22, 274–285.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analysing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services.Journal of Information Science, 32, 400–419.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Van den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D. T., & Schellens, P. J. (2010). Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue.Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 339–351.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Vlaescu, G., Carlbring, P., Lunner, T., & Andersson, G. (2015). An E-platform for rehabilitation of persons with hearing problems.American Journal of Audiology, 24, 271–275.
      LinkGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources