ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Oct 2016

Automated Proposition Density Analysis for Discourse in Aphasia

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0401

    Abstract

    Purpose

    This study evaluates how proposition density can differentiate between persons with aphasia (PWA) and individuals in a control group, as well as among subtypes of aphasia, on the basis of procedural discourse and personal narratives collected from large samples of participants.

    Method

    Participants were 195 PWA and 168 individuals in a control group from the AphasiaBank database. PWA represented 6 aphasia types on the basis of the Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (Kertesz, 2006). Narrative samples were stroke stories for PWA and illness or injury stories for individuals in the control group. Procedural samples were from the peanut-butter-and-jelly-sandwich task. Language samples were transcribed using Codes for the Human Analysis of Transcripts (MacWhinney, 2000) and analyzed using Computerized Language Analysis (MacWhinney, 2000), which automatically computes proposition density (PD) using rules developed for automatic PD measurement by the Computerized Propositional Idea Density Rater program (Brown, Snodgrass, & Covington, 2007; Covington, 2007).

    Results

    Participants in the control group scored significantly higher than PWA on both tasks. PD scores were significantly different among the aphasia types for both tasks. Pairwise comparisons for both discourse tasks revealed that PD scores for the Broca's group were significantly lower than those for all groups except Transcortical Motor. No significant quadratic or linear association between PD and severity was found.

    Conclusion

    Proposition density is differentially sensitive to aphasia type and most clearly differentiates individuals with Broca's aphasia from the other groups.

    References

    • Ardila, A. (2010). A proposed reinterpretation and reclassification of aphasic syndromes.Aphasiology, 24, 363–394.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far.Aphasiology, 14, 875–892.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Berndt, R. S., Wayland, S., Rochon, E., Saffran, E., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Quantitative production analysis: A training manual for the analysis of aphasic sentence production. Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Brink, T. L., Yesavage, J. A., Lum, O., Heersema, P. H., Adey, M., & Rose, T. L. (1982). Screening tests for geriatric depression.Clinical Gerontologist, 1(1), 37–43.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Brookshire, R. H. (1997). Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Yearbook.
      Google Scholar
    • Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., & Covington, M. (2007). Computerized Propositional Idea Density Rater 3 (CPIDR 3) [Computer software]. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, CASPR Project, Artificial Intelligence Center.
      Google Scholar
    • Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S. J., Herman, R., & Covington, M. A. (2008). Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging.Behavior Research Methods, 40, 540–545.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Bryant, L., Spencer, E., Ferguson, A., Craig, H., Colyvas, K., & Worrall, L. (2013). Propositional Idea Density in aphasic discourse.Aphasiology, 27, 992–1009.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Butler, S. M., & Snowdon, D. A. (1996). Trends in mortality in older women: Findings from the Nun Study.Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51B, S201–S208.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Chand, V., Baynes, K., Bonnici, L. M., & Farias, S. T. (2012). A rubric for extracting idea density from oral language samples.Current Protocols in Neuroscience, 58, 10.5.1–10.5.15.
      Google Scholar
    • Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS).Aphasiology, 26, 1250–1277. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.693584
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Christiansen, J. A. (1995). Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics.Brain and Language, 51, 291–317.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Coelho, C. A., Grela, B., Corso, M., Gamble, A., & Feinn, R. (2005). Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury.Brain Injury, 19, 1139–1145.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Covington, M. A. (2007). CPIDR 3 user manual. Institute for Artificial Intelligence, The University of Georgia.
      Google Scholar
    • Covington, M. A. (2012). CPIDR® 5.1 user manual. Athens, GA: Artificial Intelligence Center, The University of Georgia.
      Google Scholar
    • Covington, M. A., He, C., Brown, C., Naçi, L., & Brown, J. (2006). How complex is that sentence? A proposed revision of the Rosenberg and Abbeduto D-Level scale (CASPR Resarch Report No. 2006-01). Athens, GA: Artificial Intelligence Center, The University of Georgia.
      Google Scholar
    • Cunha, A. L. V. da, Sousa, L. B. de, Mansur, L. L., & Aluisio, S. M. (2015). Automatic proposition extraction from dependency trees: Helping early prediction of Alzheimer's disease from narratives.In C. Traina, P. P. Rodrigues, B. Kane, P. M. de A. Marques, & A. J. M. Traina (Eds.), 28th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (pp. 127–130). Los Alamitos, CA: Conference Publishing Services.
      Google Scholar
    • Engelman, M., Agree, E. M., Meoni, L. A., & Klag, M. J. (2010). Propositional density and cognitive function in later life: Findings from the Precursors Study.Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B, P706–P711.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Farias, S. T., Chand, V., Bonnici, L., Baynes, K., Harvey, D., Mungas, D., … Reed, B. (2012). Idea density measured in late life predicts subsequent cognitive trajectories: Implications for the measurement of cognitive reserve.Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67, P677–P686.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & West, T. M. (2013). Measuring lexical diversity in narrative discourse of people with aphasia.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, S397–S408.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ferguson, A., Spencer, E., Bryant, L., Craig, H., Colyvas, K., & Worrall, L. (2013, June). Computerized analysis of Propositional Idea Density: Effects of presence and severity of aphasia. Poster presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Tucson, AZ.
      Google Scholar
    • Ferguson, A., Spencer, E., Craig, H., & Colyvas, K. (2014). Propositional Idea Density in women's written language over the lifespan: Computerized analysis.Cortex, 55, 107–121.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Forbes, M., Fromm, D., Holland, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2014, May–June). EVAL: A tool for clinicians from AphasiaBank. Paper presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, St. Simons Island, GA.
      Google Scholar
    • Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons.Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Gleason, J. B., Goodglass, H., Obler, L., Green, E., Hyde, M. R., & Weintraub, S. (1980). Narrative strategies of aphasics and normal-speaking subjects.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 370–382.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Hughlings-Jackson, J. (1879). On affections of speech from disease of the brain.Brain, 2, 203–222.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Iacono, D., Markesbery, W. R., Gross, M., Pletnikova, O., Rudow, G., Zandi, P., & Troncoso, J. C. (2009). The Nun Study: Clinically silent AD, neuronal hypertrophy, and linguistic skills in early life.Neurology, 73, 665–673.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test–Second Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • Kemper, S., Greiner, L. H., Marquis, J. G., Prenovost, K., & Mitzner, T. L. (2001). Language decline across the life span: Findings from the Nun Study.Psychology and Aging, 16, 227–239.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery–Revised. New York, NY: Pearson.
      Google Scholar
    • Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 474–496.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse.Aphasiology, 25, 1286–1307.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Miller, J. (2003). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (Version V8.0) [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Waisman Center, Language Analysis Laboratory.
      Google Scholar
    • Mortimer, J. (2012). The Nun Study: Risk factors for pathology and clinical-pathologic correlations.Current Alzheimer Research, 9, 621–627.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Riley, K. P., Snowdon, D. A., Desrosiers, M. F., & Markesbery, W. R. (2005). Early life linguistic ability, late life cognitive function, and neuropathology: Findings from the Nun Study.Neurobiology of Aging, 26, 341–347.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Roark, B., Mitchell, M., Hosom, J.-P., Hollingshead, K., & Kaye, J. (2011). Spoken language derived measures for detecting mild cognitive impairment.IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 19, 2081–2090.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Rosenberg, S., & Abbeduto, L. (1987). Indicators of linguistic competence in the peer group conversational behavior of mildly retarded adults.Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 19–32.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data.Brain and Language, 37, 440–479.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Snowdon, D. A., Greiner, L. H., & Markesbery, W. R. (2000). Linguistic ability in early life and the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular disease: Findings from the Nun Study.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 903, 34–38.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Snowdon, D. A., Kemper, S. J., Mortimer, J. A., Greiner, L. H., Wekstein, D. R., & Markesbery, W. R. (1996). Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer's disease in late life: Findings from the Nun Study.JAMA, 275, 528–532.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Spencer, E., Ferguson, A., Craig, H., Colyvas, K., Hankey, G. J., & Flicker, L. (2015). Propositional idea density in older men's written language: Findings from the HIMS study using computerised analysis.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29, 85–101.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Turkstra, L. (2011). Transcortical motor aphasia.In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 2539–2540). New York, NY: Springer New York.
      Google Scholar
    • Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1977, April). The construction and use of a propositional text base (Technical Report No. 63). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior.
      Google Scholar
    • Ulatowska, H. K., Freedman-Stern, R., Doyel, A. W., Macaluso-Haynes, S., & North, A. J. (1983). Production of narrative discourse in aphasia.Brain and Language, 19, 317–334.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ulatowska, H. K., North, A. J., & Macaluso-Haynes, S. (1981). Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia.Brain and Language, 13, 345–371.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 27–36.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources