No access
Supplement Article
December 2016

Mumbling: Macho or Morphology?

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 59, Number 6
Pages S1587-S1595

Abstract

Purpose

Mumbling as opposed to clear speech is a typical male characteristic in speech and can be the consequence of a small jaw opening. Whereas behavioral reasons have often been offered to explain sex-specific differences with respect to clear speech, the purpose of this study is to investigate a potential anatomical reason for smaller jaw openings in male than in female speakers.

Method

Articulatory data from 2 data sets (American English and German) were analyzed with respect to jaw opening in low vowels during speech. Particular focus was placed on sex-specific differences, also incorporating potential interactions with different accent conditions in 1 of the data sets. In addition, a modeling study compared the articulatory consequences of similar jaw-opening settings in a typical male and a typical female articulatory model.

Results

Greater jaw openings were found for the female speakers, in particular in the accented condition, where jaw opening was found to be larger. In line with this finding, the modeling study showed that similar jaw-opening settings in male and female speakers led to differences in pharyngeal constriction, resulting in complete radico-pharyngeal closure in the male model.

Conclusion

The empirical and modeling findings suggest a possible physiological component in sex-specific differences in speech clarity for low vowels.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (1994). Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In Keating, P. A. (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory phonology III (pp. 7–33). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Berry, J. J. (2011). Accuracy of the NDI wave speech research system. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(5), 1295–1301.
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.23) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
Byrd, D. (1992). Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 593–596.
de Jong, K. J. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 491–504.
Diehl, R. L., Lindblom, B., Hoemeke, K. A., & Fahey, R. P. (1996). On explaining certain male–female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 187–208.
Erickson, D. (2002). Articulation of extreme formant patterns for emphasized vowels. Phonetica, 59, 134–149.
Fant, G. (1966). A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform F-pattern scalings. Speech, Music and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 7(4), 22–30.
Harrington, J., Fletcher, J., & Beckman, M. E. (2000). Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English. In Broe, M. B. & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon (pp. 40–51). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Heffernan, K. (2010). Mumbling is macho: Phonetic distinctiveness in the speech of American radio DJs. American Speech, 85, 67–90.
Honda, K., & Tiede, M. K. (1998). An MRI study on the relationship between oral cavity shape and larynx position. In Mannell, R. H. & Robert-Ribes, J. (Eds.), 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 437–440). Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
Hoole, P., & Zierdt, A. (2010). Five-dimensional articulography. In Maassen, B. & van Lieshout, P. H. H. M. (Eds.), Speech motor control: New developments in basic and applied research (pp. 331–349). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Ludescher, B., Knebel, C., Hoffmann, J., Schwenzer, N., Claussen, C. D., & Küper, K. (2006). MR-Volumetrie der Zunge zur Abschätzung der individuellen Zungengröße. Mund-, Kiefer-, und Gesichtschirurgie, 10, 102–106.
Macchi, M. J. (1985). Segmental and suprasegmental features of lip and jaw articulators (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) . New York University, New York.
Payan, Y., & Perrier, P. (1997). Synthesis of V–V sequences with a 2D biomechanical tongue model controlled by the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis. Speech Communication, 22, 185–205.
Perrier, P., & Winkler, R. (2015). Biomechanics of the orofacial motor system: Influence of speaker-specific characteristics on speech production. In Fuchs, S., Pape, D., Petrone, C., & Perrier, P. (Eds.), Individual differences in speech production and perception (pp. 223–254). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software] . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org
Shadle, C. H. (1990). Articulatory-acoustic relationships in fricative consonants. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 187–209). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Simpson, A. P. (2001). Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2153–2164.
Simpson, A. P. (2002). Gender-specific articulatory–acoustic relations in vowel sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 417–435.
Simpson, A. P., & Ericsdotter, C. (2003). Sex-specific durational differences in English and Swedish. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D., & Romero, J. (Eds.), 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1113–1116). Paris, France: International Phonetic Association.
Tiede, M. (2005). MVIEW: Software for visualization and analysis of concurrently recorded movement data [Computer software] . New Haven, CT: Haskins Laboratories.
Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Ostry, D. J. (1995). An analysis of the dimensionality of jaw motion in speech. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 101–117.
Vorperian, H. K., Wang, S., Schimek, E. M., Durtschi, R. B., Kent, R. D., Gentry, L. R., & Chung, M. K. (2011). Developmental sexual dimorphism of the oral and pharyngeal portions of the vocal tract: An imaging study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 995–1010.
Weirich, M., & Simpson, A. P. (2014a). Articulatory vowel spaces of male and female speakers. In Fuchs, S., Grice, M., Hermes, A., Lancia, L., & Mücke, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production (pp. 449–452). Cologne, Germany: University of Cologne.
Weirich, M., & Simpson, A. P. (2014b). Differences in acoustic vowel space and the perception of speech tempo. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 1–10.
Weirich, M. & Simpson, A. P. (2015). Impact and interaction of accent realization and speaker sex on vowel length in German. In Leemann, A., Kolly, M.-J., Schmid, S. & Dellwo, V. (Eds.), Trends in phonetics and phonology: Studies from German-speaking Europe (pp. 109–124). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Westbury, J. R. (1994). X-Ray Microbeam Speech Production Database user's handbook (Version 1.0) . Madison, WI: Waisman Center on Mental Retardation & Human Development.
Zandipour, M. (2006). A modeling investigation of vowel-to-vowel movement planning in acoustic and muscle spaces (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) . Boston University, Boston, MA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 59Number 6December 2016
Pages: S1587-S1595
PubMed: 28002839

History

  • Received: Jan 31, 2015
  • Revised: Sep 9, 2015
  • Accepted: Jan 28, 2016
  • Published in issue: Dec 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Melanie Weirich
ZAS—Centre for General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany
Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
Susanne Fuchs
ZAS—Centre for General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany
Adrian Simpson
Institute for German Linguistics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
Ralf Winkler
ZAS—Centre for General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany
Pascal Perrier
Université Grenoble Alpes, Gipsa-lab, Grenoble, France
CNRS, Gipsa-lab, Grenoble, France

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to Melanie Weirich: [email protected]
Editor: Jody Kreiman
Associate Editor: Leonardo Lancia

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • „Das klingt echt schwul“ – Eine soziophonetische Untersuchung zum stereotypen schwulen Sprechen im Deutschen, Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik, 10.1515/zfal-2024-2005, 2024, 80, (136-180), (2024).
  • The vowel space of multiethnolectal (Stuttgart) German, Phonetica, 10.1515/phon-2023-0017, 82, 1, (9-43), (2024).
  • Clinical Focus: The Development and Description of a Palette of Transmasculine Voices, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00398, 33, 3, (1113-1126), (2024).
  • Formant-based articulatory strategies: Characterisation and inter-speaker variability analysis, Journal of Phonetics, 10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101374, 107, (101374), (2024).
  • Morphological and acoustic modeling of the vocal tract, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0017356, 153, 3, (1867-1886), (2023).
  • The Acoustics of Gender in Indian English: Toward Forensic Profiling in a Multilingual Context, Journal of Voice, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.07.030, (2023).
  • Examining vocal attractiveness through articulatory working space, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 10.1121/10.0005730, 150, 2, (1548-1564), (2021).
  • Clear versus casual consonant identification by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10.1080/02699206.2019.1694586, 34, 8, (734-755), (2019).
  • Gender identity is indexed and perceived in speech, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0209226, 13, 12, (e0209226), (2018).
  • Seeing Speech Production Through the Window of Complex Interactions: Introduction to the Supplement of Select Papers From the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP) in Cologne, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0387, 59, 6, (S1555-S1557), (2018).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share