Purpose

This study compares the precision of the electromagnetic articulographs used in speech research: Northern Digital Instruments' Wave and Carstens' AG200, AG500, and AG501 systems.

Method

The fluctuation of distances between 3 pairs of sensors attached to a manually rotated device that can position them inside the measurement volumes was determined. For each device, 2 precision estimates made on the basis of the 95% quantile range of these distances (QR95) were defined: The local QR95 was computed for bins around specific rotation angles, and the global QR95 was computed for all angles pooled.

Results

For all devices, although the local precision lies around 0.1 cm, the global precision is much more worrisome, ranging from 0.03 cm to 2.18 cm, and displays large variations as a function of the position of the sensors in the measurement volume. No influence of the rotational speed was found. The AG501 produced—by far—the lowest errors, in particular concerning the global precision.

Conclusions

The local precision can be considered suitable for speech articulatory measurements, but the variations of the global precision need to be taken into account by the knowledge of the spatial distribution of errors. A guideline for good practice in EMA recording is proposed for each system.

References

  • Badin, P., Valdés Vargas, J. A., Koncki, A., Lamalle, L., & Savariaux, C. (2013). Development and implementation of fiducial markers for vocal tract MRI imaging and speech articulatory modelling.In F. Bimbot (Ed.), 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2013): Speech in Life Sciences and Human Societies (pp. 1321–1325). Baixas, France: International Speech Communication Association.
  • Bainbridge, T. R. (1985). The committee on standards: Precision and bias.ASTM Standardization News, 13, 44–46.
  • Beautemps, D., Badin, P., & Bailly, G. (2001). Linear degrees of freedom in speech production: Analysis of cineradio- and labio-film data and articulatory-acoustic modeling.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2165–2180.
  • Berry, J. J. (2011). Accuracy of the NDI Wave speech research system.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1295–1301.
  • Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution.Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127–135.
  • Geng, C., Turk, A., Scobbie, J. M., Macmartin, C., Hoole, P., Richmond, K., … Wiegand, R. (2013). Recording speech articulation in dialogue: Evaluating a synchronized double electromagnetic articulography setup.Journal of Phonetics, 41, 421–431.
  • Hoole, P. (1996). Issues in the acquisition, processing, reduction and parameterization of articulographic data.Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Spachliche Kommunikation der Universität München, FIPKM, 34, 158–173.
  • Hoole, P., & Nguyen, N. (1997). Electromagnetic articulography in coarticulation research.Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Spachliche Kommunikation der Universität München, FIPKM, 35, 177–184.
  • Hoole, P., & Zierdt, A. (2010). Five-dimensional articulography.In B. Maassen & P. H. H. M. Van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech motor control: New developments in basic and applied research (pp. 331–349). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.Biometrical Journal, 50, 346–363.
  • Hummel, J., Figl, M., Birkfellner, W., Bax, M. R., Shahidi, R., Maurer, C. R., Jr., & Bergmann, H. (2006). Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol.Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, N205–N220.
  • Kaburagi, T., Wakamiya, K., & Honda, M. (2005). Three-dimensional electromagnetic articulography: A measurement principle.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 428–443.
  • Kröger, B. J., Pouplier, M., & Tiede, M. K. (2008). An evaluation of the Aurora system as a flesh-point tracking tool for speech production research.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 914–921.
  • Kroos, C. (2008). Measurement accuracy in 3D electromagnetic articulography (Carstens AG500).In R. Sock, S. Fuchs, & Y. Laprie (Eds.), ISSP 2008 Proceedings (pp. 61–64). Rocquencourt, France: INRIA.
  • Kroos, C. (2012). Evaluation of the measurement precision in three-dimensional electromagnetic articulography (Carstens AG500).Journal of Phonetics, 40, 453–465.
  • Ostry, D. J., & Munhall, K. G. (1985). Control of rate and duration of speech movements.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 640–648.
  • Payan, Y., & Perrier, P. (1997). Synthesis of V-V sequences with a 2D biomechanical tongue model controlled by the equilibrium point hypothesis.Speech Communication, 22, 185–205.
  • Perkell, J. S., Cohen, M. M., Svirsky, M. A., Matthies, M. L., Garabieta, I., & Jackson, M. T. T. (1992). Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3078–3096.
  • R_Development_Core_Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.org
  • Schönle, P. W., Gräbe, K., Wenig, P., Höhne, J., Schrader, J., & Conrad, B. (1987). Electromagnetic articulography: Use of alternating magnetic fields for tracking movements of multiple points inside and outside the vocal tract.Brain and Language, 31, 26–35.
  • Serrurier, A., Badin, P., Barney, A., Boë, L.-J., & Savariaux, C. (2012). The tongue in speech and feeding: Comparative articulatory modelling.Journal of Phonetics, 40, 745–763.
  • Stella, M., Bernardini, P., Sigona, F., Stella, A., Grimaldi, M., & Gili Fivela, B. (2012). Numerical instabilities and three-dimensional electromagnetic articulography.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 3941–3949.
  • Stella, M., Stella, A., Sigona, F., Bernardini, P., Grimaldi, M., & Gili Fivela, B. (2013). Electromagnetic articulography with AG500 and AG501.In F. Bimbot (Ed.), 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2013): Speech in Life Sciences and Human Societies (pp. 1316–1320). Baixas, France: International Speech Communication Association.
  • Walther, B. A., & Moore, J. L. (2005). The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance.Ecography, 28, 815–829.
  • West, M. J. (1999). Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: Issues of precision and bias.Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 51–61.
  • Westbury, J. R., Severson, E. J., & Lindstrom, M. J. (2000). Kinematic event patterns in speech: Special problems.Language and Speech, 43, 403–428.
  • Yunusova, Y., Green, J. R., & Mefferd, A. (2009). Accuracy assessment for AG500, electromagnetic articulograph.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 547–555.
  • Zierdt, A. (1993). Problems of electromagnetic position transduction for a three-dimensional articulographic measurement system.Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München, FIPKM, 31, 137–142.
  • Zierdt, A. (2007). EMA and the crux of calibration.In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 593–596). Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot GmbH.

Additional Resources