ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
No AccessAmerican Journal of Speech-Language PathologyResearch Article8 Nov 2017

A Clear Speech Approach to Accent Management

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0177

    Abstract

    Purpose

    A 5-session twice-weekly clear speech protocol with daily home practice was developed to enable Spanish-accented speakers of English to code-switch for increased listener ease of understanding. This study provides preliminary data to test the hypothesis that this protocol results in increased ease of understanding for native English listeners, not in decreased talker accentedness.

    Method

    Using a single-case experimental design, 6 adult native Spanish speakers with English proficiency participated in the protocol. Ease of understanding and accentedness were probed at least 5 times pretraining, at each training session, and once per week for 5 weeks posttraining. Thirty native English–speaking listeners assessed the probes using 7-point scales for each measure.

    Results

    Ease of understanding improved for all participants (mean improvement = 3.5 points; effect size range = 6.98 to 15.33). Accentedness improved for 4 of 6 participants (mean improvement = 2.3 points; effect size range = 4.04 to 10.48). At the outset, most participants expressed concern that this approach would highlight speech errors. Upon follow-up, all participants reported confidence in using the approach and found it helpful in daily communication.

    Conclusions

    Further research should explore the effects of this protocol on intelligibility and acoustic metrics and their relationship to ease of understanding and accentedness.

    References

    • Barb, C. (2005). Suprasegmentals and comprehensibility: A comparative study in accent modification (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wichita State University, KS. Retrieved from http://soar.wichita.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10057/570/d05005.pdf.txt?sequence=4
      Google Scholar
    • Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
      Google Scholar
    • Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature.Neuropsychological Review, 16, 161–169.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Behrman, A. (2014). Segmental and prosodic approaches to accent management.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 546–561.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Behrman, A., & Akhund, A. (2013). The influence of semantic context on the perception of Spanish-accented American English.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1567–1578.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 1600–1610.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities.In M. J. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
      Google Scholar
    • Byiers, B. J., Reichle, J., & Symons, F. J. (2012). Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 397–414.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Carter, P. M. (2005). Quantifying rhythmic differences between Spanish, English, and Hispanic English.In R. S. Gess & E. J. Rubin (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 63–75). Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
      Google Scholar
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Colina, S. (2009). Spanish phonology: A syllabic perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Cutler, A. (2003). Listening to a second language through the ears of a first.Interpreting, 5, 1–23.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1990). Durational cues to word boundaries in clear speech.Speech Communication, 9, 485–495.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Davidson, L. (2011). Phonetic and phonological factors in the second language production of phonemes and phonotactics.Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 126–139.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Delattre, P. (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages.International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4, 183–198.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2009). Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace.The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 181–202.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction.Language Learning, 48, 393–410.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech.Applied Language Learning, 13, 1–17.
      Google Scholar
    • Eddington, D. (2004). Spanish phonology and morphology: Experimental and quantitative perspectives. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Ferguson, S. H. (2004). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2365–2373.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 259–271.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1241–1255.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ferguson, S. H., & Quené, H. (2014). Acoustic correlates of vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135, 3570–3574.
      Google Scholar
    • Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second-language speech.In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
      Google Scholar
    • Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech.Language Learning, 34, 65–89.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kain, A., Amano-Kusumoto, A., & Hosom, J.-P. (2008). Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 2308–2319.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context.The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 459–489.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Lam, J., & Tjaden, K. (2013a). Intelligibility of clear speech: Effect of instruction.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1429–1440.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Lam, J., & Tjaden, K. (2013b). Acoustic-perceptual relationships in variants of clear speech.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 65, 148–153.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Lam, J., Tjaden, K., & Wilding, G. (2012). Acoustics of clear speech: Effect of instruction.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1807–1821.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Levi, S. V., Winters, S. J., & Pisoni, D. B. (2007). Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 2327–2338.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory.In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
      Google Scholar
    • Liss, J. M., White, L., Mattys, S. L., Lansford, K., Lotto, A. J., Spitzer, S., & Caviness, J. N. (2009). Quantifying speech rhythm deficits in the dysarthrias.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1334–1352.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Liu, S., & Zeng, F. G. (2006). Temporal properties in clear speech perception.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 424–432.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Maas, E., & Farinella, K. A. (2012). Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 561–578.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277–298.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Matthies, M., Perrier, P., Perkell, J. S., & Zandipour, M. (2001). Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 340–353.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Metz, D. E., Schiavetti, N., & Sacco, P. R. (1989). Acoustic and psychophysical dimensions of the perceived speech naturalness of nonstutterers and posttreatment stutterers.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 516–525.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Moyer, A. (2007). Do language attitudes determine accent? A study of bilinguals in the USA.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28, 502–518.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners.Language Learning, 45, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners.Language Learning, 49, 285–310.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • National Education Association. (2010). Hispanics: Education issues. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/HispanicsEducation%20Issues.htm
      Google Scholar
    • Neel, A. T., & Long, E. (2015). Listener profiles of accented English speech. Presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Denver, CO.
      Google Scholar
    • Olive, M. L., & Smith, B. W. (2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs.Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25, 313–324.
      Google Scholar
    • Pavlenko, A., & Jarvis, S. (2002). Bidirectional transfer.Applied Linguistics, 23, 190–214.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Pew Research Center. (2016). American Community Survey (IPUMS). Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-key-charts/
      Google Scholar
    • Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. I. Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 96–103.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review.Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Rogers, C. L., DeMasi, T. M., & Krause, J. C. (2010). Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 410–423.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Salcedo, C. S. (2010). The phonological system of Spanish.Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas, 5, 195–209. Translated at https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3269828.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Schmidt, A. M., & Meyers, K. A. (1995). Traditional and phonological treatment for teaching English fricatives and affricates to Koreans.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 828–838.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2014). Motor learning and performance: From principles to application (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
      Google Scholar
    • Searl, J., & Evitts, P. M. (2013). Tongue-palate contact pressure, oral air pressure, and acoustics of clear speech.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 826–839.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Shin, H. B., & Ortman, J. (2011). Language projections: 2010 to 2020. Paper presented at the Federal Forecasters Conference, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/language/data/acs/Shin_Ortman_FFC2011_paper.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Sikorski, L. D. (2014). Proficiency in Oral English Communication: An assessment battery of accented oral English (4th ed.). Tustin, CA: LDS & Associates.
      Google Scholar
    • Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. (2007). Clear speech intelligibility: Listener and talker effects. ICPhS, XVI, 661–664.
      Google Scholar
    • Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1677–1688.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2008). Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 3171–3182.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: Intelligibility and accentedness.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 4020–4031.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Tasko, S. M., & Greilick, K. (2010). Acoustic and articulatory features of diphthong production: A speech clarity study.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 84–99.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Uchanski, R. M., Choi, S. S., Braida, L. D., Reed, C. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1996). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 494–509.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Wilson, E. O., & Spaulding, T. J. (2010). Effects of noise and speech intelligibility on listener comprehension and processing time of Korean-accented English.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1543–1554.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Wolfram, W., & Schilling, N. (2015). American English: Dialects and variations (3rd ed.). West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
      Google Scholar
    • Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., & Hakel, M. (2010). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • Yorkston, K. M., Hammen, V. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Traynor, C. D. (1990). The effect of rate control on the intelligibility and naturalness of dysarthric speech.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 550–560.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources