ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessAmerican Journal of Speech-Language PathologyResearch Article15 Aug 2017

Language Sampling With Adolescents: Building a Normative Database With Fables

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0181

    Abstract

    Purpose

    The goal of the study was to create a language sampling task appropriate for adolescents and to contribute normative data from speakers with typical language development.

    Method

    Thirty adolescents (mean age = 14 years, 1 month) participated in an interview that involved the retelling and interpretation of 4 Greek fables. Each speaker's performance on the task was audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and entered into the Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts computer program (Miller & Iglesias, 2015). Samples were analyzed statistically for language productivity and syntactic complexity. In addition, each participant's perspective on the moral messages of the fables was examined informally.

    Results

    The Fables task was effective in prompting adolescents to use complex language and in encouraging them to express their opinions about the moral messages. Although boys and girls did not differ in their performance on the task, some fables were more effective than others at eliciting spoken language and complex syntax. Moreover, the adolescents tended to agree with the moral messages of the fables and appeared to find them relevant to their lives.

    Conclusion

    The Fables task has potential for clinical use with adolescents. Research is necessary to expand the normative database to include larger and more diverse groups of adolescents.

    References

    • Aesop's fables. (1947). New York, NY: Grosset & Dunlap.
      Google Scholar
    • Aesop's fables. (1997). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
      Google Scholar
    • Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Heilmann, J., & Malone, T. O. (2014). The rules of the game: Properties of a database of expository language samples.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45, 277–290.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Heilmann, J., Nockerts, A., & Miller, J. F. (2010). Language sampling: Does length of the sample matter?.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 393–404.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Hewitt, L. E., Scheffner Hammer, C., Yont, K. M., & Tomblin, J. B. (2005). Language sampling for kindergarten children with and without SLI: Mean length of utterance, IPSYN, and NDW.Journal of Communication Disorders, 38, 197–213.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Joffe, V. L., & Nippold, M. A. (2012). Progress in understanding adolescent language disorders.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 438–444.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Knopf, A. A. (1992). Aesop's fables. New York, NY: Random House.
      Google Scholar
    • Lerner, R. M. (2002). Adolescence: Development, diversity, context, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
      Google Scholar
    • McDougalLittell. (2006). The language of literature: Teacher's edition, grade 7. Evanston, IL: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Meline, T., & Schmitt, J. F. (1997). Case studies for evaluating statistical significance in group designs.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 33–41.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Miller, J. F., Andriacchi, K., & Nockerts, A. (2015). Assessing language production using SALT software: A clinician's guide to language sample analysis (2nd ed.). Middleton, WI: SALT Software.
      Google Scholar
    • Miller, J. F., Andriacchi, K., & Nockerts, A. (2016). Using language sample analysis to assess spoken language production in adolescents.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47, 99–112.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Miller, J. F., & Iglesias, A. (2015). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), Version 16.1.5 [Computer software]. Madison, WI: SALT Software, LLC.
      Google Scholar
    • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards initiative. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org
      Google Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A. (2014). Language sampling with adolescents: Implications for intervention (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Plural.
      Google Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A., Cramond, P. M., & Hayward-Mayhew, C. (2014). Spoken language production in adults: Examining age-related differences in syntactic complexity.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28, 195–207.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A., Frantz-Kaspar, M. W., Cramond, P., Kirk, C., Hayward-Mayhew, C., & MacKinnon, M. (2014). Conversational and narrative speaking in adolescents: Examining the use of complex syntax.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 876–886.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A., Frantz-Kaspar, M. W., Cramond, P. M., Kirk, C., Hayward-Mayhew, C., & MacKinnon, M. (2015). Critical thinking about fables: Examining language production and comprehension in adolescents.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 325–335.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A., Hesketh, L. J., Duthie, J. K., & Mansfield, T. C. (2005). Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1048–1064.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. C., & Billow, J. L. (2007). Peer conflict explanations in children, adolescents, and adults: Examining the development of complex syntax.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 179–188.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. C., Billow, J. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Expository discourse in adolescents with language impairments: Examining syntactic development.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 356–366.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. C., Billow, J. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Syntactic development in adolescents with a history of language impairments: A follow-up investigation.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 241–251.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Paul, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communication (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
      Google Scholar
    • Paul, R. W. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (3rd ed.). Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
      Google Scholar
    • Paul, R. W., Binker, A. J. A., Jensen, K., & Kreklau, H. (1987). Critical thinking handbook: 4th–6th grades. Rohnert Park, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
      Google Scholar
    • Pavelko, S. L., Owens, R. E., Ireland, M., & Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2016). Use of language sample analysis by school-based SLPs: Results of a nationwide survey.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47, 246–258.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2006). Information density in the development of spoken and written narratives in English and Hebrew.Discourse Processes, 41, 117–149.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Santrock, J. W. (1996). Adolescence: An introduction (6th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark/Times Mirror Higher Education Group.
      Google Scholar
    • SAS Institute. (2013). Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.2.: Cary, NC: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • Schickedanz, J. A., Schickedanz, D. I., Forsyth, P. D., & Forsyth, G. A. (2001). Understanding children and adolescents (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
      Google Scholar
    • Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Stothard, S. E., Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V. M., Chipchase, B. B., & Kaplan, C. A. (1998). Language-impaired preschoolers: A follow-up into adolescence.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 407–418.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Strong, C. J., & Shaver, J. P. (1991). Stability of cohesion in the spoken narratives of language-impaired and normally developing school-age children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 95–111.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • J. B. Tomblin, & M. A. Nippold (Eds.). (2014). Understanding individual differences in language development across the school years. New York, NY: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Wiig, E. H., Semel, E., & Secord, W. A. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—Fifth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
      Google Scholar

    Additional Resources