ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessAmerican Journal of Speech-Language PathologyResearch Article1 Mar 2018

Describing Phonological Paraphasias in Three Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0210

    Abstract

    Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to describe the linguistic environment of phonological paraphasias in 3 variants of primary progressive aphasia (semantic, logopenic, and nonfluent) and to describe the profiles of paraphasia production for each of these variants.

    Method

    Discourse samples of 26 individuals diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia were investigated for phonological paraphasias using the criteria established for the Philadelphia Naming Test (Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 2013). Phonological paraphasias were coded for paraphasia type, part of speech of the target word, target word frequency, type of segment in error, word position of consonant errors, type of error, and degree of change in consonant errors.

    Results

    Eighteen individuals across the 3 variants produced phonological paraphasias. Most paraphasias were nonword, followed by formal, and then mixed, with errors primarily occurring on nouns and verbs, with relatively few on function words. Most errors were substitutions, followed by addition and deletion errors, and few sequencing errors. Errors were evenly distributed across vowels, consonant singletons, and clusters, with more errors occurring in initial and medial positions of words than in the final position of words. Most consonant errors consisted of only a single-feature change, with few 2- or 3-feature changes. Importantly, paraphasia productions by variant differed from these aggregate results, with unique production patterns for each variant.

    Conclusions

    These results suggest that a system where paraphasias are coded as present versus absent may be insufficient to adequately distinguish between the 3 subtypes of PPA. The 3 variants demonstrate patterns that may be used to improve phenotyping and diagnostic sensitivity. These results should be integrated with recent findings on phonological processing and speech rate. Future research should attempt to replicate these results in a larger sample of participants with longer speech samples and varied elicitation tasks.

    Supplemental Materials

    https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5558107

    References

    • Ardila, A., & Rosselli, M. (1993). Language deviations in aphasia: A frequency analysis.Brain and Language, 44(2), 165–180.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ash, S., Evans, E., O'Shea, J., Powers, J., Boller, A., Weinberg, D., … Grossman, M. (2013). Differentiating primary progressive aphasias in a brief sample of connected speech.Neurology, 81(4), 329–336.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Berg, T. (2006). A structural account of phonological paraphasias.Brain and Language, 96(3), 331–356.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Bird, H., Ralph, M. A. L., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). The rise and fall of frequency and imageability: Noun and verb production in semantic dementia.Brain and Language, 73(1), 17–49.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Botha, H., Duffy, J. R., Whitwell, J. L., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Schwarz, C. G., … Josephs, K. A. (2015). Classification and clinicoradiologic features of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and apraxia of speech.Cortex, 69, 220–236.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Burns, M. S., & Canter, G. J. (1977). Phonemic behavior of aphasic patients with posterior cerebral lesions.Brain and Language, 4(4), 492–507.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Canter, G. J., Trost, J. E., & Burns, M. S. (1985). Contrasting speech patterns in apraxia of speech and phonemic paraphasia.Brain and Language, 24(2), 204–222.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Caramazza, A., Berndt, R. S., & Basili, A. G. (1983). The selective impairment of phonological processing: A case study.Brain and Language, 18(1), 128–174.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Cordella, C., Dickerson, B. C., Quimby, M., Yunusova, Y., & Green, J. R. (2017). Slowed articulation rate is a sensitive diagnostic marker for identifying non-fluent primary progressive aphasia.Aphasiology, 2, 241–260.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Croot, K., Ballard, K., Leyton, C. E., & Hodges, J. R. (2012). Apraxia of speech and phonological errors in the diagnosis of nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1562–S1572.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
      Google Scholar
    • Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ellis, A. W., Miller, D., & Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke's aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology.Cognition, 15(1), 111–144.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Dell, G. S., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). The origins of formal paraphasias in aphasics' picture naming.Brain and Language, 59(3), 450–472.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Brambati, S. M., Ginex, V., Ogar, J., Dronkers, N. F., Marcone, A., … Miller, B. L. (2008). The logopenic/phonological variant of primary progressive aphasia.Neurology, 71(16), 1227–1234.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., … Miller, B. L. (2004). Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.Annals of Neurology, 55(3), 335–346.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. E. E. A., … Manes, F. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants.Neurology, 76(11), 1006–1014.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gorno-Tempini, M. L., & Pressman, P. (2016). Introduction to primary progressive aphasia.In G. Hickock, & S. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp. 935–952). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Gunawardena, D., Ash, S., McMillan, C., Avants, B., Gee, J., & Grossman, M. (2010). Why are patients with progressive nonfluent aphasia nonfluent?.Neurology, 75(7), 588–594.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Haley, K., Jacks, A., Richardson, J., & Wambaugh, J. (2017). Perceptually salient sound distortions and apraxia of speech: A performance continuum.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31, 631–640.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Henry, M. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2010). The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.Current Opinion in Neurology, 23(6), 633–637.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Henry, M. L., Wilson, S. M., Babiak, M. C., Mandelli, M. L., Beeson, P. M., Miller, Z. A., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2016). Phonological processing in primary progressive aphasia.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(2), 210–222.
      Google Scholar
    • Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (1996). Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative neuropsychological study.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(6), 511–524.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Jefferies, E., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Jones, R., Bateman, D., & Patterson, K. (2004). Surface dyslexia in semantic dementia: A comparison of the influence of consistency and regularity.Neurocase, 10(4), 290–299.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Josephs, K. A., Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Senjem, M. L., Master, A. V., … Whitwell, J. L. (2012). Characterizing a neurodegenerative syndrome: Primary progressive apraxia of speech.Brain, 135(Pt. 5), 1522–1536. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws032
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Jung, Y., Duffy, J. R., & Josephs, K. A. (2013). Primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech.Seminars in Neurology, 33, 342–347.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kay, J., & Ellis, A. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia: Implications for psychological models of word retrieval.Brain, 110(3), 613–629.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kellogg, M. K. (1994). Conceptual mechanisms underlying noun and verb categorization: Evidence from paraphasia.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20(1), 300–309.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Leyton, C. E., Ballard, K. J., Piguet, O., & Hodges, J. R. (2014). Phonologic errors as a clinical marker of the logopenic variant of PPA.Neurology, 82(18), 1620–1627.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mesulam, M. (1982). Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia.Annals of Neurology, 11(6), 592–598.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mesulam, M. (1987). Primary progressive aphasia—Differentiation from Alzheimer's disease.Annals of Neurology, 22(4), 533–534.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mesulam, M. (2001). Primary progressive aphasia.Annals of Neurology, 49(4), 425–432.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute. (2013). Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Scoring Protocol. Retrieved from http://www.mrri.org/philadelphia-naming-test (September 28, 2015).
      Google Scholar
    • Neary, D., Snowden, J. S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuss, D. T., Black, S. E., … Benson, D. F. (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria.Neurology, 51(6), 1546–1554.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Patterson, K., Graham, N., & Hodges, J. R. (1994). The impact of semantic memory loss on phonological representations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 57–69.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Patterson, K., & MacDonald, M. C. (2006). Sweet nothings: Narrative speech in semantic dementia.In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 299–317). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Petroi, D., Duffy, J. R., Strand, E. A., & Josephs, K. A. (2014). Phonologic errors in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.Aphasiology, 28(10), 1223–1243.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Rohrer, J. D., Ridgway, G. R., Crutch, S. J., Hailstone, J., Goll, J. C., Clarkson, M. J., & Ourselin, S. (2010). Progressive logopenic/phonological aphasia: Erosion of the language network.NeuroImage, 49(1), 984–993.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Schwartz, M. F., Wilshire, C. E., Gagnon, D. A., & Polansky, M. (2004). Origins of nonword phonological errors in aphasic picture naming.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 159–186.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Sepelyak, K., Crinion, J., Molitoris, J., Epstein-Peterson, Z., Bann, M., Davis, C., … Hillis, A. E. (2011). Patterns of breakdown in spelling in primary progressive aphasia.Cortex, 47, 342–352.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Stark, J. A., & Dressler, W. U. (1990). Agrammatism in German: Two case studies.In L. Menn & L. Obler (Eds.), Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative sourcebook. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
      Google Scholar
    • Wilson, S. M., Henry, M. L., Besbris, M., Ogar, J. M., Dronkers, N. F., Jarrold, W., … Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2010). Connected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.Brain, 133(7), 2069–2088.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Woollams, A. M., Ralph, M. A. L., Plaut, D. C., & Patterson, K. (2007). SD-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia.Psychological Review, 114(2), 316–339.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources