No access
Clinical Focus
8 November 2017

Intensive Treatment for Persisting Rhotic Distortions: A Case Series

Publication: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 26, Number 4
Pages 1066-1079

Abstract

Purpose

The study explored changes in accuracy of American English rhotics as a result of an intensive 1-week therapy program for adolescents and young adults with residual speech sound errors that had not resolved with previous therapy.

Method

Four case reports are presented of individuals aged 13, 17, 21, and 22 years with residual /ɹ/ distortions. Each participant attended a 1-week intensive program consisting of pretreatment assessments, 14 hr of therapy, and posttreatment assessment. Treatment sessions included structured motor-based practice, ultrasound visual feedback of the tongue, and auditory speech perception training. To assess generalization, untreated words and sentences with rhotics were recorded before and after therapy; these were rated by listeners who were blind to when the recordings were taken.

Results

All participants showed measurable and statistically significant improvement in speech sound accuracy. Averaged across the 4 participants, rhotic accuracy at the word level improved from 35% to 83%. At the sentence level, rhotic accuracy increased from 11% pretreatment to 66% posttreatment in 1 week.

Conclusion

The promise of an intensive treatment program that includes motor-based practice, biofeedback, and auditory perception training is illustrated by the case presentations in which substantial improvements in speech sound accuracy were observed.

Supplemental Materials

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adler-Bock, M., Bernhardt, B., Gick, B., & Bacsfalvi, P. (2007). The use of ultrasound in remediation of North American English /r/ in 2 adolescents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(2), 128–139.
Albery, L., & Enderby, P. (1984). Intensive speech therapy for cleft palate children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 19(2), 115–124.
Allen, M. M. (2013). Intervention efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(3), 865–877.
Audacity Team. (2008). Audacity (Version 2.0.3) [Computer program] . Retrieved from http://audacityteam.org/
Bacsfalvi, P. (2010). Attaining the lingual components of /r/ with ultrasound for three adolescents with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 34(3), 206–217.
Bacsfalvi, P., & Bernhardt, B. M. (2011). Long-term outcomes of speech therapy for seven adolescents with visual feedback technologies: Ultrasound and electropalatography. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 1034–1043.
Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16(4), 161–169.
Bernhardt, B., Bacsfalvi, P., Adler-Bock, M., Shimizu, R., Cheney, A., Giesbrecht, N., … Radanov, B. (2008). Ultrasound as visual feedback in speech habilitation: Exploring consultative use in rural British Columbia, Canada. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(2), 149–162.
Bird, J., & Bishop, D. V. M. (1992). Perception and awareness of phonemes in phonologically impaired children. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 27, 289–311.
Boersma, P., & Weeninck, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.82) [Computer software] . Retrieved from http://www.praat.org
Boyce, S. E. (2015). The articulatory phonetics of /r/ for residual speech errors. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(4), 257–270.
Brandel, J., & Frome Loeb, D. (2011). Program intensity and service delivery models in the schools: SLP survey results. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(4), 461–490.
Cabbage, K. L., Hogan, T. P., & Carrell, T. D. (2016). Speech perception differences in children with dyslexia and persistent speech delay. Speech Communication, 82, 14–25.
Cleland, J., Scobbie, J. M., & Wrench, A. A. (2015). Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(8–10), 575–597.
Dollaghan, C. A., & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136–1146.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
Fabus, R., Raphael, L., Gatzonis, S., Dondorf, K., Giardina, K., Cron, S., & Badke, B. (2015). Preliminary case studies investigating the use of electropalatography (EPG) manufactured by Completespeech® as a biofeedback tool in intervention. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 3(1), 11–23.
Flipsen, P. (2015). Emergence and prevalence of persistent and residual speech errors. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(4), 217–223.
Gibbon, F., & Lee, A. (2015). Electropalatography for older children and adults with residual speech errors. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(4), 271–282.
Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation–Second Edition. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224.
Hitchcock, E. R., & McAllister Byun, T. M. (2015). Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: A case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(1), 59–75.
Hitchcock, E. R., Harel, D., & McAllister Byun, T. M. (2015). Social, emotional, and academic impact of residual speech errors in school-aged children: A survey study. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(04), 283–294.
Huang, H., Wolf, S. L., & He, J. (2006). Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering Rehabilitation, 3, 11.
Kaipa, R., & Peterson, A. M. (2016). A systematic review of treatment intensity in speech disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(6), 507–520.
Klein, H. B., McAllister Byun, T., Davidson, L., & Grigos, M. I. (2013). A multidimensional investigation of children's /r/ productions: Perceptual, ultrasound, and acoustic measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(3), 540–553.
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Ingham, J. C. (1986). Programming rapid generalization of correct articulation through self-monitoring procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51(1), 24–32.
Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., Ingham, J. C., & Van Voy, K. (1988). Within-clinic versus outside-of-clinic self-monitoring of articulation to promote generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53(4), 392–399.
Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Austermann Hula, S. N., Freedman, S. E., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(3), 277–298.
McAllister Byun, T. M., & Campbell, H. (2016). Differential effects of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention for residual speech errors. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 567.
McAllister Byun, T. M., & Hitchcock, E. R. (2012). Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(3), 207–221.
McAllister Byun, T. M., Hitchcock, E. R., & Swartz, M. T. (2014). Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2116–2130.
McAllister Byun, T. M., Swartz, M. T., Halpin, P. F., Szeredi, D., & Maas, E. (2016). Direction of attentional focus in biofeedback treatment for /r/ misarticulation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(4), 384–401.
McCormack, J., McLeod, S., McAllister, L., & Harrison, L. J. (2009). A systematic review of the association between childhood speech impairment and participation across the lifespan. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(2), 155–170.
Miccio, A. W. (2002). Clinical problem solving: Assessment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(3), 221–229.
Modha, G., Bernhardt, B., Church, R., & Bacsfalvi, P. (2008). Ultrasound in treatment of /r/: A case study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43(3), 323–329.
Namasivayam, A. K., Pukonen, M., Goshulak, D., Hard, J., Rudzicz, F., Rietveld, T., … van Lieshout, P. (2015). Treatment intensity and childhood apraxia of speech. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(4), 529–546.
Newell, K., Carlton, M., & Antoniou, A. (1990). The interaction of criterion and feedback information in learning a drawing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22(4), 536–552.
Nijland, L. (2009). Speech perception in children with speech output disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(3), 222–239.
Ohde, R. N., & Sharf, D. J. (1988). Perceptual categorization and consistency of synthesized /r-w/ continua by adults, normal children and /r/-misarticulating children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 556–568.
Preston, J. L., & Edwards, M. L. (2007). Phonological processing skills of adolescents with residual speech sound errors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 297–308.
Preston, J. L., Felsenfeld, S., Frost, S. J., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Grigorenko, E. L., … Pugh, K. R. (2012). Functional brain activation differences in school-age children with speech sound errors: Speech and print processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(4), 1068–1082.
Preston, J. L., Irwin, J. R., & Turcios, J. (2015). Perception of speech sounds in school-aged children with speech sound disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(4), 224–233.
Preston, J. L., Leece, M. C., & Maas, E. (2016). Intensive treatment with ultrasound visual feedback for speech sound errors in childhood apraxia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(440), 440.
Preston, J. L., Leece, M. C., & Maas, E. (2017). Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(1), 80–94.
Preston, J. L., McCabe, P., Rivera-Campos, A., Whittle, J. L., Landry, E., & Maas, E. (2014). Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practice variability for residual speech sound errors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2102–2115.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
Ruscello, D. M. (1995). Visual feedback in treatment of residual phonological disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 279–302.
Ruscello, D. M., & Shelton, R. L. (1979). Planning and self-assessment in articulatory training. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 44(4), 504–512.
Rvachew, S. (1994). Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 347–357.
Rvachew, S., Hodge, M., & Ohberg, A. (2005). Obtaining and interpreting maximum performance tasks from children: A tutorial. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 29(4), 146–157.
Rvachew, S., & Jamieson, D. G. (1989). Perception of voiceless fricatives by children with a functional articulation disorder. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(2), 193–208.
Rvachew, S., Nowak, M., & Cloutier, G. (2004). Effect of phonemic perception training on the speech production and phonological awareness skills of children with expressive phonological delay. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(3), 250–263.
Rvachew, S., Ohberg, A., Grawburg, M., & Heyding, J. (2003). Phonological awareness and phonemic perception in 4-year-old children with delayed expressive phonology skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(4), 463–471.
Rvachew, S., Rafaat, S., & Martin, M. (1999). Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8(1), 33–43.
Schmidt, A. M. (2007). Evaluating a new clinical palatometry system. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9(1), 73–81.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Shriberg, L. D. (2009). Childhood speech sound disorders: From postbehaviorism to the postgenomic era. In Paul, R. & Flipsen, P. (Eds.), Speech sound disorders in children. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1987). A retrospective study of spontaneous generalization in speech-delayed children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18(2), 144–157.
Shuster, L. I. (1998). The perception of correctly and incorrectly produced /r/. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 941–950.
Shuster, L. I., Ruscello, D. M., & Smith, K. D. (1992). Evoking [r] using visual feedback. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1(3), 29–34.
Silverman, F. H., & Paulus, P. G. (1989). Peer reactions to teenagers who substitute /w/ for /r/. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 20, 219–221.
Skelton, S. L., & Hagopian, A. L. (2014). Using randomized variable practice in the treatment of childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(4), 599–611.
Thoonen, G., Maassen, B., Gabreels, F., & Schreuder, R. (1999). Validity of maximum performance tasks to diagnose motor speech disorders in children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13(1), 1–23.
Thoonen, G., Maassen, B., Wit, J., Gabreëls, F., & Schreuder, R. (1996). The integrated use of maximum performance tasks in differential diagnostic evaluations among children with motor speech disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10(4), 311–336.
Unicomb, R., Colyvas, K., Harrison, E., & Hewat, S. (2015). Assessment of reliable change using 95% credible intervals for the differences in proportions: A statistical analysis for case-study methodology. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 728–739.
Van Riper, C. (1963). Speech correction: Principles and methods (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. R. (2013). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing–Second Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence–Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Wiig, E., Semel, E., & Secord, W. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fifth Edition. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 26Number 4November 2017
Pages: 1066-1079
PubMed: 29114774

History

  • Received: Dec 1, 2016
  • Revised: Apr 25, 2017
  • Accepted: Jun 13, 2017
  • Published in issue: Nov 8, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jonathan L. Preston
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY
Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT
Megan C. Leece
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to Jonathan L. Preston: [email protected]
Editor: Krista Wilkinson
Associate Editor: Rebecca McCauley

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Usability of Two Ultrasound Tongue Imaging Devices in Speech-Language Pathology, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00293, 34, 3, (1407-1424), (2025).
  • Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Speech Therapy for /ɹ/: A Single-Case Experimental Study, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00448, 33, 5, (2461-2486), (2024).
  • Uso de feedback visual con ecografía en la intervención de las dificultades de articulación en niños con discapacidad auditiva. Una valoración por jueces expertos: logopedas, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 10.1016/j.rlfa.2024.100494, 44, 3, (100494), (2024).
  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment Distribution and Biofeedback Effects on Speech Production in School-Age Children With Apraxia of Speech, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00622, 67, 9S, (3414-3436), (2023).
  • Reproducible Speech Research With the Artificial Intelligence–Ready PERCEPT Corpora, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00343, 66, 6, (1986-2009), (2023).
  • Intervention for residual speech errors in adolescents and adults: A systematised review, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10.1080/02699206.2023.2186765, 38, 3, (203-226), (2023).
  • Baseline Stimulability Predicts Patterns of Response to Traditional and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00161, 65, 8, (2860-2880), (2022).
  • Telepractice Treatment of Residual Rhotic Errors Using App-Based Biofeedback: A Pilot Study, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084, 53, 2, (256-274), (2022).
  • Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00216, 30, 4, (1819-1845), (2021).
  • Tutorial: Motor-Based Treatment Strategies for /r/ Distortions, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00012, 51, 4, (966-980), (2020).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share