No access
Research Article
Research Article
6 February 2018

Concurrent Validity and Reliability for the Communication Complexity Scale

Publication: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 27, Number 1
Pages 237-246

Abstract

Purpose

The Communication Complexity Scale (CCS; Brady et al., 2012) was created to fill a void in measures of expressive communication skills in individuals who communicate primarily with presymbolic or early symbolic means. CCS scores reflect expressive communication observed during interactive communication contexts.

Method

Two studies were completed to examine the reliability and validity of the revised CCS scores. Participants in both studies had minimal verbal skills (i.e., produced less than 20 functional words). Study 1 examined interobserver agreement, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity for 239 participants with intellectual disabilities between the ages of 3–66 years, assessed with the protocol developed at the University of Kansas (KU CCS). CCS scores were compared with scores from the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–Second Edition (Sparrow, Cicchetti, & Balla, 2005) and the Communication Matrix (Rowland & Fried-Oken, 2010). Study 2 examined the reliability and concurrent validity for CCS scores derived from 110 children (chronological age = 3–9) with autism from diverse backgrounds. These children were assessed with the Early Social Communication Scale (Mundy et al., 2003). CCS scores were compared with rates of communication derived from the Early Social Communication Scale.

Results

CCS scores were moderately correlated with scores from existing measures of early communication. In addition, CCS scores from different raters were reliable, and test–retest scores were highly similar.

Conclusions

These findings support the validity and reliability of the CCS when used with individuals across a wide range of ages and with various types of disabilities. The CCS can be used in research and clinical practice to describe extant communication levels in individuals with minimal verbal skills.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Brady, N., Fleming, K., Thiemann-Bourque, K., Olswang, L., Dowden, P., Saunders, M., & Marquis, J. (2012). Development of the Communication Complexity Scale. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 16–28.
Brady, N., Marquis, J., Fleming, K., & McLean, L. (2004). Prelinguistic predictors of language growth in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 663–667.
Brady, N., McLean, J., McLean, L., & Johnston, S. (1995). Initiation and repair of intentional communication acts by adults with severe to profound cognitive disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1334–1348.
Calloway, C. J., Myles, B. S., & Earles, T. L. (1999). The development of communicative functions and means in students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 140–149.
Camaioni, L., Perucchini, P., Muratori, F., Parrinii, B., & Cesari, A. (2003). The communicative use of pointing in autism: Developmental profile and factors related to change. European Psychiatry, 18, 6–12.
Climie, E., & Henley, L. (2016). A renewed focus on strengths-based assessment in schools. British Journal of Special Education, 43, 108–121.
Cosden, M., Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Greenwell, A., & Klein, E. (2006). Strength-based assessment for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 134–143.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (2007). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Kasari, C., Brady, N., Lord, C., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2013). Assessing the minimally verbal school-aged child with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 6, 479–493.
Kasari, C., Freeman, S., & Paparella, T. (2006). Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: A randomized controlled intervention study. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 611–620.
Kasari, C., Paparella, T., Freeman, S., & Jahromi, L. B. (2008). Language outcome in autism: Randomized comparison of joint attention and play interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 125–137.
Keen, D., Woodyatt, G., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Verifying teacher perceptions of the potential communicative acts of children with autism. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 23, 131–140.
Legerstee, M., & Fisher, T. (2008). Coordinated attention, declarative and imperative pointing in infants with and without Down syndrome: Sharing experiences with adults and peers. First Language, 28, 281–311.
McLean, J. E., McLean, L. K. S., Brady, N., & Etter, R. (1991). Communication profiles of two types of gesture using nonverbal persons with severe to profound mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 294–308.
Mundy, P., Delgado, C., Block, J., Venezia, M., Hogan, A., & Seibert, J. (2003). Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami.
Ogletree, B. T., Wetherby, A. M., & Westling, D. L. (1992). Profile of the prelinguistic intentional communicative behaviors of children with profound mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 186–196.
Plesa Skwerer, D., Jordan, S. E., Brukilacchio, B. H., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2016). Comparing methods for assessing receptive language skills in minimally verbal children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 20, 591–604.
Remington, B., Hastings, R. P., Kovshoff, H., Degli Espinosa, F., Jahr, E., Brown, T., … Ward, N. (2007). Early intensive behavioral intervention: Outcomes for children with autism and their parents after two years. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 112(6), 418–438.
Rowland, C., & Fried-Oken, M. (2010). Communication matrix: A clinical and research assessment tool targeting children with severe communication disorders. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 3, 319–329.
Sigafoos, J., Woodyatt, G., Keen, D., Tait, K., Tucker, M., & Roberts-Pennell, D. (2000). Identifying potential communicative acts in children with developmental and physical disabilities. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 77–86.
Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D., & Balla, D. (2005). Vineland-II: Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–Second Edition. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
Watson, L. R. (2013). Communicative gesture use in infants with and without autism: A retrospective home video study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 25–39.
Werling, D. M., & Geschwind, D. H. (2013). Sex differences in autism spectrum disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology, 26, 146–153.
Wetherby, A., Watt, N., Morgan, L., & Shumway, S. (2007). Social communication profiles of children with autism spectrum disorders late in the second year of life. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 960–975.
Yoder, P., & Stone, W. L. (2006). Randomized comparison of two communication interventions for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 426–435.
Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V., & Evatt Pond, R. (2003). Preschool Language Scale–Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume 27Number 16 February 2018
Pages: 237-246
PubMed: 29383380

History

  • Received: Jul 14, 2017
  • Revised: Sep 25, 2017
  • Accepted: Oct 17, 2017
  • Published in issue: Feb 6, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nancy C. Brady
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences & Disorders, The University of Kansas, The Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, Lawrence
Kandace Fleming
Research Design and Analysis Unit, The University of Kansas, The Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, Lawrence
Rebecca Swinburne Romine
Research Design and Analysis Unit, The University of Kansas, The Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, Lawrence
Alison Holbrook
Department of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles
Kristen Muller
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences & Disorders, The University of Kansas, The Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, Lawrence
Connie Kasari
Department of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to Nancy C. Brady: [email protected]
Editor-in-Chief: Krista Wilkinson
Editor: Cynthia Cress

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • A systematic review of research on staff training as an intervention to develop communication in children and adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10.1111/jar.13201, 37, 2, (2024).
  • A Chinese version of the communication complexity scale (CCS): psychometric evaluation in children with minimal verbal skills, Disability and Rehabilitation, 10.1080/09638288.2023.2226405, 46, 11, (2433-2440), (2023).
  • A Comparison of Maternal and Clinician Perception of Communication in Autistic Toddlers, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00200, 66, 6, (2064-2078), (2023).
  • Determining an Effective Language Sample Elicitation Strategy for Early Language Learners Who Speak Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00148, 33, 1, (203-219), (2023).
  • Applying a Developmental Model to Preliterate Aided Language Learning, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00098, 33, 1, (33-50), (2023).
  • Children and young adults with profound and multiple learning disabilities: Evidence of intelligible subvocal language, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104633, 143, (104633), (2023).
  • Changes in the early communicative behaviors of young children with significant cognitive and motor developmental delays in a two-year span, Journal of Communication Disorders, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106337, 104, (106337), (2023).
  • Measuring social communication in people with intellectual disability who use minimal speech: Differences across the lifespan, Social and Communicative Functioning in Populations with Intellectual Disability: Rethinking Measurement, 10.1016/bs.irrdd.2023.08.002, (205-252), (2023).
  • Adaptation of in-person curriculum tools for remote assessment of infants and toddlers with social communication concerns in community-based settings, Social and Communicative Functioning in Populations with Intellectual Disability: Rethinking Measurement, 10.1016/bs.irrdd.2023.07.002, (171-204), (2023).
  • Inclusion of Individuals With Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Norm-Referenced Language Assessments, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929433, 13, (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share