ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article17 Apr 2018

Interpreting Mini-Mental State Examination Performance in Highly Proficient Bilingual Spanish–English and Asian Indian–English Speakers: Demographic Adjustments, Item Analyses, and Supplemental Measures

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0021

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), among the most widely used global screens of adult cognitive status, is affected by demographic variables including age, education, and ethnicity. This study extends prior research by examining the specific effects of bilingualism on MMSE performance.

    Method

    Sixty independent community-dwelling monolingual and bilingual adults were recruited from eastern and western regions of the United States in this cross-sectional group study. Independent sample t tests were used to compare 2 bilingual groups (Spanish–English and Asian Indian–English) with matched monolingual speakers on the MMSE, demographically adjusted MMSE scores, MMSE item scores, and a nonverbal cognitive measure. Regression analyses were also performed to determine whether language proficiency predicted MMSE performance in both groups of bilingual speakers.

    Results

    Group differences were evident on the MMSE, on demographically adjusted MMSE scores, and on a small subset of individual MMSE items. Scores on a standardized screen of language proficiency predicted a significant proportion of the variance in the MMSE scores of both bilingual groups.

    Conclusions

    Bilingual speakers demonstrated distinct performance profiles on the MMSE. Results suggest that supplementing the MMSE with a language screen, administering a nonverbal measure, and/or evaluating item-based patterns of performance may assist with test interpretation for this population.

    References

    • American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines—Speaking. Retrieved from http://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdf
      Google Scholar
    • Anderson, J. A., Saleemi, S., & Bialystok, E. (2017). Neuropsychological assessments of cognitive aging in monolingual and bilingual older adults.Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43, 17–27.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Arevalo-Rodriguez, I., Smailagic, N., Roqué, I. F. M., Ciapponi, A., Sanchez-Perez, E., Giannakou, A., … Cullum, S. (2015). Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD010783.
      Google Scholar
    • Bialystok, E. (2011). Reshaping the mind: the benefits of bilingualism.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 229–235.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Binns, M. A., Ossher, L., & Freedman, M. (2014). Effects of bilingualism on the age of onset and progression of MCI and AD: Evidence from executive function tests.Neuropsychology, 28(2), 290.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual language profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin.
      Google Scholar
    • Bravo, G., & Hébert, R. (1997). Age- and education-specific reference values for the Mini‐Mental and Modified Mini‐Mental State Examinations derived from a non‐demented elderly population.International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12(10), 1008–1018.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Busch, R. M., & Chapin, J. S. (2008). Review of normative data for common screening measures used to evaluate cognitive functioning in elderly individuals.The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(4), 620–650.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Busse, A., Sonntag, A., Bischkopf, J., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2002). Adaptation of dementia screening for vision-impaired older persons: administration of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(9), 909–915.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Carnero-Pardo, C. (2014). Should the Mini-Mental State Examination be retired?.Neurología (English Edition), 29(8), 473–481.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Crowe, M., Allman, R. M., Triebel, K., Sawyer, P., & Martin, R. C. (2010). Normative performance on an executive clock drawing task (CLOX) in a community-dwelling sample of older adults.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(7), 610–617.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Crum, R. M., Anthony, J. C., Bassett, S. S., & Folstein, M. F. (1993). Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level.JAMA, 269(18), 2386–2391.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Escobar, J. I., Burnam, A., Karno, M., Forsythe, A., Landsverk, J., & Golding, J. M. (1986). Use of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in a community population of mixed ethnicity: Cultural and linguistic artifacts.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(10), 607–614.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Gibbons, L. E., Crane, P. K., Mehta, K. M., Pedraza, O., Tang, Y., Manly, J. J., … Mungas, D. (2011). Multiple, correlated covariates associated with differential item functioning (DIF): Accounting for language DIF when education levels differ across languages.Ageing Research, 2(1), 19–25.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Hawkins, K. A., Cromer, J. R., Piotrowski, A. S., & Pearlson, G. D. (2011). Mini-Mental State Exam performance of older African Americans: Effect of age, gender, education, hypertension, diabetes, and the inclusion of serial 7s subtraction versus “world” backward on score.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(7), 645–652.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 23.0.: Armonk, NY: Author.
      Google Scholar
    • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery–Revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
      Google Scholar
    • Linguistic Society of America. (2016). How many languages are there in the world?Retrieved from http://www.linguisticsociety.org/content/how-many-languages-are-there-world
      Google Scholar
    • Llamas-Velasco, S., Llorente-Ayuso, L., Contador, I., & Bermejo-Pareja, F. (2015). Versiones en español del Minimental State Examination (MMSE). Cuestiones para su uso en la práctica clínica.Revista de Neurologia, 61, 363–71.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Luo, L., Craik, F. I., Moreno, S., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Bilingualism interacts with domain in a working memory task: Evidence from aging.Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 28–46.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse.Aphasiology, 25(11), 1286–1307.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Marshall, S. C., Mungas, D., Weldon, M., Reed, B., & Haan, M. (1997). Differential item functioning in the Mini-Mental State Examination in English- and Spanish-speaking older adults.Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 718–725.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Matallana, D., & Reyes-Ortiz, C. A. (2011). The relationship between education level and Mini Mental State Examination domains among older Mexican Americans.Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 24(1), 9–18.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • McGrory, S., Doherty, J. M., Austin, E. J., Starr, J. M., & Shenkin, S. D. (2014). Item response theory analysis of cognitive tests in people with dementia: A systematic review.BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 1–15.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Millsap, R. E. (2006). Comments on methods for the investigation of measurement bias in the Mini-Mental State Examination.Medical Care, 44(11), S171–S175.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mindt, M. R., Arentoft, A., Germano, K. K., D'Aquila, E., Scheiner, D., Pizzirusso, M., … Gollan, T. H. (2008). Neuropsychological, cognitive, and theoretical considerations for evaluation of bilingual individuals.Neuropsychology Review, 18(3), 255–268.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mitchell, A. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the Mini-Mental State Examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(4), 411–431.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Molloy, D. W., Alemayehu, E., & Roberts, R. (1991). Reliability of a standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination.The American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(1), 102–105.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mungas, D., Marshall, S. C., Weldon, M., Haan, M., & Reed, B. R. (1996). Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly.Neurology, 46(3), 700–706.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mungas, D., Widaman, K. F., Reed, B. R., & Tomaszewski Farias, S. (2011). Measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in diverse older persons.Neuropsychology, 25(2), 260.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Nieuwenhuis-Mark, R. E. (2010). The death knoll for the MMSE: Has it outlived its purpose?.Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 23(3), 151–157.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Nilsson, F. M. (2007). Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)—Probably one of the most cited papers in health science.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 116(2), 156–157.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Nys, G. M. S., Van Zandvoort, M. J. E., De Kort, P. L. M., Jansen, B. P. W., Kappelle, L. J., & De Haan, E. H. F. (2005). Restrictions of the Mini-Mental State Examination in acute stroke.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(5), 623–629.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • O'Brien, M. G., Curtin, S., & Naqvi, R. (2014). Understanding multilingualism and its implications.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1464.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Osher, J. E., Wicklund, A. H., Rademaker, A., Johnson, N., & Weintraub, S. (2008). The Mini-Mental State Examination in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia.American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 22(6), 468–473.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Padilla, C., Mendez, M. F., Jimenez, E. E., & Teng, E. (2016). Bilingualism in older Mexican-American immigrants is associated with higher scores on cognitive screening.BMC Geriatrics, 16(1), 189.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Pedraza, O., Clark, J. H., O'Bryant, S. E., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., Graff‐Radford, N. R., … Lucas, J. A. (2012). Diagnostic validity of age and education corrections for the Mini‐Mental State Examination in older African Americans.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60(2), 328–331.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ramirez, M., Teresi, J. A., Holmes, D., Gurland, B., & Lantigua, R. (2006). Differential item functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): Overview, sample, and issues of translation.Medical Care, 44(11), S95–S106.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. San Antonio, TX: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • Roccaforte, W. H., Burke, W. J., Bayer, B. L., & Wengel, S. P. (1992). Validation of a telephone version of the Mini‐Mental State Examination.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(7), 697–702.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ruff, R. M., Light, R. H., Parker, S. B., & Levin, H. S. (1996). Benton controlled oral word association test: Reliability and updated norms.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11(4), 329–338.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Spering, C. C., Hobson, V., Lucas, J. A., Menon, C. V., Hall, J. R., & O'Bryant, S. E. (2012). Diagnostic accuracy of the MMSE in detecting probable and possible Alzheimer's disease in ethnically diverse highly educated individuals: an analysis of the NACC database.Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences, 67(8), 890–896.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Steis, M. R., & Schrauf, R. W. (2009). A review of translations and adaptations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in languages other than English and Spanish.Research in Gerontological Nursing, 2(3), 214–224.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Teng, E. L., & Chui, H. C. (1987). The modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS).The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 41(2), 114–21.
      Google Scholar
    • Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992). The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A comprehensive review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40(9), 922–935.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37–49.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar

    Additional Resources