ASHAWire
Advanced search
Skip main navigation
No AccessJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing ResearchResearch Article9 Nov 2017

Neural Indices of Semantic Processing in Early Childhood Distinguish Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery

    https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0081

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Maturation of neural processes for language may lag in some children who stutter (CWS), and event-related potentials (ERPs) distinguish CWS who have recovered from those who have persisted. The current study explores whether ERPs indexing semantic processing may distinguish children who will eventually persist in stuttering (CWS-ePersisted) from those who will recover from stuttering (CWS-eRecovered).

    Method

    Fifty-six 5-year-old children with normal receptive language listened to naturally spoken sentences in a story context. ERP components elicited for semantic processing (N400, late positive component [LPC]) were compared for CWS-ePersisted, CWS-eRecovered, and children who do not stutter (CWNS).

    Results

    The N400 elicited by semantic violations had a more focal scalp distribution (left lateralized and less anterior) in the CWS-eRecovered compared with CWS-ePersisted. Although the LPC elicited in CWS-eRecovered and CWNS did not differ, the LPC elicited in the CWS-ePersisted was smaller in amplitude compared with that in CWNS.

    Conclusions

    ERPs elicited in 5-year-old CWS-eRecovered compared with CWS-ePersisted suggest that future recovery from stuttering may be associated with earlier maturation of semantic processes in the preschool years. Subtle differences in ERP indices offer a window into neural maturation processes for language and may help distinguish the course of stuttering development.

    References

    • Adams, M. R. (1990). The demands and capacities model I: Theoretical elaborations.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 15(3), 135–141.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • American Electroencephalographic Society. (1994). Guideline thirteen: Guidelines for standard electrode placement nomenclature.Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 11, 111–113.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Anderson, J., & Conture, E. (2000). Language abilities of children who stutter: A preliminary study.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 25, 283–304.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Anderson, J. D., Pellowski, M. W., & Conture, E. G. (2005). Childhood stuttering and dissociations across linguistic domains.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30(3), 219–253.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies.Child Development, 55(2), 341–354.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Beal, D. S., Lerch, J. P., Cameron, B., Henderson, R., Gracco, V. L., & De Nil, L. F. (2015). The trajectory of gray matter development in Broca's area is abnormal in people who stutter.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 89.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Bernstein Ratner, N. (1997). Stuttering: A psycholinguistic perspective.In R. Curlee & G. Siegel (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (2nd ed., pp. 99–127). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
      Google Scholar
    • Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures.In R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development (pp. 279–362). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
      Google Scholar
    • Bloodstein, O., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2008). A handbook on stuttering. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
      Google Scholar
    • Bosshardt, H.-G. (1993). Differences between stutterers' and nonstutterers' short-term recall and recognition performance.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(2), 286–293.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Bosshardt, H.-G. (1999). Effects of concurrent mental calculation on stuttering, inhalation and speech timing.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 24(1), 43–72.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bosshardt, H.-G. (2002). Effects of concurrent cognitive processing on the fluency of word repetition: Comparison between persons who do and do not stutter.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27(2), 93–114.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Bosshardt, H.-G., Ballmer, W., & de Nil, L. (2002). Effects of category and rhyme decisions on sentence production.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(5), 844–857.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Bosshardt, H.-G., & Fransen, H. (1996). Online sentence processing in adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(4), 785–797.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Burgemeister, B., Blum, L., & Lorge, I. (1972). The Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
      Google Scholar
    • Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language–Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
      Google Scholar
    • Chang, S.-E., Angstadt, M., Chow, H. M., Etchell, A. C., Garnett, E. O., Choo, A. L., … Sripada, C. (in press). Anomalous network architecture of the resting brain in children who stutter.Journal of Fluency Disorders.
      Google Scholar
    • Chang, S.-E., Erickson, K. I., Ambrose, N. G., Hasegawa-Johnson, M. A., & Ludlow, C. L. (2008). Brain anatomy differences in childhood stuttering.NeuroImage, 39(3), 1333–1344.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Chang, S.-E., & Zhu, D. C. (2013). Neural network connectivity differences in children who stutter.Brain, 136(12), 3709–3726.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Chang, S.-E., Zhu, D., Choo, A. L., & Angstadt, M. (2015). White matter neuroanatomical differences in young children who stutter.Brain, 38, 694–711.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Choo, A. L., Burnham, E., Hicks, K., & Chang, S. E. (2016). Dissociations among linguistic, cognitive, and auditory-motor neuroanatomical domains in children who stutter.Journal of Communication Disorders, 61, 29–47.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Chow, H. M., & Chang, S.-E. (2017). White matter developmental trajectories associated with persistence and recovery of childhood stuttering.Human Brain Mapping, 38, 3345–3359.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Coch, D., Maron, L., Wolf, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Word and picture processing in children: An event-related potential study.Developmental Neuropsychology, 22(1), 373–406.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Conture, E. G., & Curlee, R. F. (2007). Stuttering and related disorders of fluency (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.
      Google Scholar
    • Conture, E. G., Zackheim, C. T., Anderson, J. D., & Pellowski, M. W. (2004). Linguistic processes and childhood stuttering: Many's a slip between intention and lip.In B. Maassen, R. Kent, H. Peters, P. van Lieshout, & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 253–281). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Coulter, C. E., Anderson, J. D., & Conture, E. G. (2009). Childhood stuttering and dissociations across linguistic domains: A replication and extension.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 34(4), 257–278.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Cuadrado, E., & Weber-Fox, C. (2003). Atypical syntactic processing in individuals who stutter: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and behavioral measures.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 960–976.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Friederici, A. D. (2006). The neural basis of language development and its impairment.Neuron, 52, 941–952.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1219–1248.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ganis, G., Kutas, M., & Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for “common sense”: An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(2), 89–106.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Goffman, L. (2010). Dynamic interaction of motor and language factors in normal and disordered development.In B. Maassen & P. van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech motor control: New developments in basic and applied research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Hagoort, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2009). The speaking brain.Science, 326, 372–373.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Hahne, A., Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Brain signatures of syntactic and semantic processes during children's language development.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1302–1318.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Hall, N. E. (1996). Language and fluency in child language disorders: Changes over time.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 21, 1–32.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Hall, N. E. (1999). Speech disruptions in pre-school children with specific language impairment and phonological impairment.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 13, 295–307.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Hall, N. E., & Burgess, S. D. (2000). Exploring developmental changes in fluency as related to language acquisition.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 25(2), 119–141.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Hall, N. E., Yamashita, T. S., & Aram, D. M. (1993). Relationship between language and fluency in children with developmental language disorders.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 568–579.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Hampton Wray, A. (2015). Development of neural processes for language in young children: A longitudinal event-related potential study. Poster session presented at the Seventh Annual Society for the Neurobiology of Language Conference, Chicago, IL.
      Google Scholar
    • Hampton Wray, A., & Weber-Fox, C. (2013). Specific aspects of cognitive and language proficiency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children.Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 49–171.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
      Google Scholar
    • Hickock, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135–145.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Holcomb, P. J., Coffey, S. A., & Neville, H. J. (1992). Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event-related brain potentials.Developmental Neuropsychology, 8(2–3), 203–241.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
      Google Scholar
    • Hubbard, C. P., & Prins, D. (1994). Word familiarity, syllabic stress pattern, and stuttering.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(3), 564–571.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2000). The neural correlates of language production.In The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 845–865). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Ingham, R. J. (2001). Brain imaging studies of developmental stuttering.Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 493–516.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Juottonen, K., Revonsuo, A., & Lang, H. (1996). Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms (LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effect.Cognitive Brain Research, 4(2), 99–107.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009). Nativism versus neuroconstructivism: Rethinking the study of developmental disorders.Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 56–63.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kell, C. A., Neumann, K., von Kriegstein, K., Posenenske, C., von Gudenberg, A. W., Euler, H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2009). How the brain repairs stuttering.Brain, 132(10), 2747–2760.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing.In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science, 207(1), 203–205.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Leech, K., Weber, C., Brown, B. & Bernstein Ratner, N. (in press). Linguistic predictors of recovery and persistence in children who stutter: A growth modeling analysis.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
      Google Scholar
    • Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Lindner, K. (2003). The development of sentence-interpretation strategies in monolingual German-learning children with and without specific language impairment.Linguistics, 41(2), 213–254.
      CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(213), 1–14.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Luck, S. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Ludlow, C. L., & Loucks, T. (2003). Stuttering: A dynamic motor control disorder.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28, 273–295.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • MacPherson, M. K., & Smith, A. (2013). Influences of sentence length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor control of children who stutter.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 89–102.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • McPherson, W. B., & Holcomb, P. J. (1999). An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects.Psychophysiology, 36(1), 53–65.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Mohan, R., & Weber, C. (2015). Neural systems mediating processing of sound units of language distinguish recovery versus persistence in stuttering.Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 7(1), 28.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Neef, N. E., Jung, K., Rothkegel, H., Pollok, B., von Gudenberg, A. W., Paulus, W., & Sommer, M. (2011). Right-shift for non-speech motor processing in adults who stutter.Cortex, 47(8), 945–954.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Ntourou, K., Conture, E. G., & Lipsey, M. W. (2011). Language abilities of children who stutter: A meta-analytical review.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 163–179.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Nunez, P. (1995). Neocortical dynamics and human EEG rhythms. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Packman, A. (2012). Theory and therapy in stuttering: A complex relationship.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37(4), 225–233.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2010). Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2728–2744.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Pellowski, M. W., & Conture, E. (2005). Lexical priming in picture naming in young children who do and do not stutter.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 278–294.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Preibisch, C., Neumann, K., Raab, P., Euler, H. A., von Gudenberg, A. W., Lanfermann, H., & Giraud, A.-L. (2003). Evidence for compensation for stuttering by the right frontal operculum.NeuroImage, 20(2), 1356–1364.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Sato, Y., Mori, K., Koizumi, T., Minagawa-Kawai, Y., Tanaka, A., Ozawa, E., … Mazuka, R. (2011). Functional lateralization of speech processing in adults and children who stutter.Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 70.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Sitnikova, T., Holcomb, P., & Kuperberg, G. (2008). Neurocognitive mechanisms of human comprehension.In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events: From perception to action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
      Google Scholar
    • Sitnikova, T., Kuperberg, G., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: An electrophysiological investigation.Psychophysiology, 40(1), 160–164.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Smith, A., Sadagopan, N., Walsh, B., & Weber-Fox, C. (2010). Increasing phonological complexity reveals heightened instability in inter-articulatory coordination in adults who stutter.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35, 1–18.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Smith, A., & Weber, C. (2017). How stuttering develops: The multifactorial dynamic pathways theory.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 2483–2505.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Spencer, C., & Weber-Fox, C. (2014). Preschool speech articulation and nonword repetition abilities may help predict eventual recovery or persistence in stuttering.Journal of Fluency of Disorders, 41, 32–46.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Strohner, H., & Nelson, K. E. (1974). The young child's development of sentence comprehension: Influence of event probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form, and strategies.Child Development, 45(3), 567–576.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Thal, D. J., & Flores, M. (2001). Development of sentence interpretation strategies by typically developing and late-talking toddlers.Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 173–193.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Thornhill, D. E., & Van Petten, C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(3), 382–392.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Usler, E., Smith, A., & Weber, C. (2017). A lag in speech motor coordination is associated with stuttering persistence in young children.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 51–61.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Usler, E., & Weber-Fox, C. (2015). Neurodevelopment for syntactic processing distinguishes childhood stuttering recovery versus persistence.Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 7(1), 4.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 176–190.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
      Google Scholar
    • Walsh, B., Mettel, K. M., & Smith, A. (2015). Speech motor planning and execution deficits in early childhood stuttering.Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 7(1), 27.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Watkins, R. V., & Yairi, E. (1997). Language production abilities of children whose stuttering persisted or recovered.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 385–399.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Watkins, R. V., Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. G. (1999). Early childhood stuttering III: Initial status of expressive language abilities.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1125–1135.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Weber-Fox, C., & Hampton, A. (2008). Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(5), 1058–1071.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Weber-Fox, C., Hampton Wray, A., & Arnold, H. (2013). Early childhood stuttering and electrophysiological indices of language processing.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38, 206–221.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Weber-Fox, C., Spencer, R., Spruill, J. E., III, & Smith, A. (2004). Phonological processing in adults who stutter: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1244–1258.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Weber-Fox, C., Spruill, J. E., III, Spencer, R., & Smith, A. (2008). Atypical neural functions underlying phonological processing and silent rehearsal in children who stutter.Developmental Science, 11, 321–337.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures.Cognitive Brain Research, 13(3), 363–375.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. (1999). Early childhood stuttering I: Persistency and recovery rates.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1097–1112.
      ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
    • Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. (2005). Early childhood stuttering for clinicians by clinicians. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
      Google Scholar
    • Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. (2013). Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38, 66–87.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Yairi, E., Ambrose, N. G., Paden, E. P., & Throneburg, R. N. (1996). Predictive factors of persistence and recovery: Pathways of childhood stuttering.Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 51–77.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Yairi, E., & Seery, H. (2015). Stuttering: Foundations and clinical applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
      Google Scholar
    • Yamada, Y., & Neville, H. J. (2007). An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences.Brain Research, 1130, 167–180.
      CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Pond, R. (1979). Preschool Language Scale. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
      Google Scholar

    Additional Resources