Abstract
Purpose
This study examined whether older adults remain perceptually flexible when presented with ambiguities in speech in the absence of lexically disambiguating information. We expected older adults to show less perceptual learning when top-down information was not available. We also investigated whether individual differences in executive function predicted perceptual learning in older and younger adults.
Method
Younger (n = 31) and older adults (n = 27) completed 2 perceptual learning tasks composed of a pretest, exposure, and posttest phase. Both learning tasks exposed participants to clear and ambiguous speech tokens, but crucially, the lexically guided learning task provided disambiguating lexical information whereas the distributional learning task did not. Participants also performed several cognitive tasks to investigate individual differences in working memory, vocabulary, and attention-switching control.
Results
We found that perceptual learning is maintained in older adults, but that learning may be stronger in contexts where top-down information is available. Receptive vocabulary scores predicted learning across both age groups and in both learning tasks.
Conclusions
Implicit learning is maintained with age across different learning conditions but remains stronger when lexically biasing information is available. We find that receptive vocabulary is relevant for learning in both types of learning tasks, suggesting the importance of vocabulary knowledge for adapting to ambiguities in speech.
References
-
Adank, P., & Janse, E. (2010). Comprehension of a novel accent by young and older listeners.Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 736–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020054 -
Baese-Berk, M., Bent, T., Borrie, S., & McKee, M. (2015). Individual differences in perception of unfamiliar speech.In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Paper number 0460, 1–5. -
Baum, S. R. (2003). Age differences in the influence of metrical structure on phonetic identification.Speech Communication, 39(3–4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00028-6 -
Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., & De Gelder, B. (2003). Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect.Psychological Science, 14(6), 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1470.x -
Bidelman, G. M., Villafuerte, J. W., Moreno, S., & Alain, C. (2014). Age-related changes in the subcortical-cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech.Neurobiology of Aging, 35(11), 2526–2540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.05.006 -
Bilger, R., Nuetzel, J., Rabinowitz, W., & Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2017541 -
Boersma, P., & Weenik, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://praat.org/ -
Chládková, K., Podlipský, V. J., & Chionidou, A. (2017). Perceptual adaptation of vowels generalizes across the phonology and does not require local context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000333 -
Clayards, M., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Jacobs, R. A. (2008). Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.Cognition, 108(3), 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.004 -
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT-III: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: AGS. -
Eimas, P. D., & Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90006-6 -
Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 1950–1953. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178721 -
Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(1), 110–125. -
Golomb, J. D., Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2007). Effects of stimulus variability and adult aging on adaptation to time-compressed speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(3), 1701–1708. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2436635 -
Guediche, S., Fiez, J. A., & Holt, L. L. (2016). Adaptive plasticity in speech perception: Effects of external information and internal predictions.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 1048–1059. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000196 -
Helfer, K. S., & Freyman, R. L. (2014). Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(2), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4887463 -
Helfer, K. S., & Freyman, R. L. (2016). Age equivalence in the benefit of repetition for speech understanding.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(5), EL371–EL377. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4966586 -
Helfer, K. S., Merchant, G. R., & Freyman, R. L. (2016). Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(5), 3844–3853. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4967297 -
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939–1956. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025641 -
Ishida, M., Samuel, A. G., & Arai, T. (2016). Some people are “more lexical” than others.Cognition, 151, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.008 -
Kawahara, H., Morise, M., Takahashi, T., Nisimura, R., Irino, T., & Banno, H. (2008). Tandem-straight: A temporally stable power spectral representation for periodic signals and applications to interference-free spectrum, F0, and aperiodicity estimation.Proceedings from IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 3933–3936. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4518514 -
Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015a). Inferring listeners' prior beliefs about unfamiliar talkers. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3803.4405 -
Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015b). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.Psychological Review, 122(2), 148–203. -
Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015c). Re-examining selective adaptation: Fatiguing feature detectors, or distributional learning?.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423 -
Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers.Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.010 -
Liu, R., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1783–1798. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000092 -
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review.Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7/8), 953–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.705006 -
Mattys, S. L., & Scharenborg, O. (2014). Phoneme categorization and discrimination in younger and older adults: A comparative analysis of perceptual, lexical, and attentional factors.Psychology and Aging, 29(1), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035387 -
Maye, J., & Gerken, L. (2000). Learning phonemes without minimal pairs.Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 2, 522–533. -
McAuliffe, M., & Babel, M. (2016). Stimulus-directed attention attenuates lexically guided perceptual learning.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(3), 1727–1738. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4962529 -
McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (2006). The dynamic nature of speech perception.Language and Speech, 49(1), 101–112. -
Midford, R., & Kirsner, K. (2005). Implicit and explicit learning in aged and young adults.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12(4), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580500246894 -
Mueller, S. T. (2011). The PEBL digit span test. Retrieved from http://pebl.sourceforge.net/ -
Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery.Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250–259. -
Neger, T. M., Rietveld, T., & Janse, E. (2014). Relationship between perceptual learning in speech and statistical learning in younger and older adults.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00628 -
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech.Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00006-9 -
Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding.Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656 -
Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2008). Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: Balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing.International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), S72–S82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802307404 -
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Souza, P. E. (2003). Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.International Journal of Audiology, 42, 2S11–2S16. -
Piper, B. J., Li, V., Eiwaz, M. A., Kobel, Y. V., Benice, T. S., Chu, A. M., … Raber, J. (2012). Executive function on the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests.Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 124–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0173-x -
Reinisch, E., & Holt, L. L. (2014). Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(2), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034409 -
Reitan, R. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8(3), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271 -
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Park, D. C. (2014). How does it STAC up? Revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition.Neuropsychology Review, 24(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9 -
Revill, K., & Spieler, D. (2012). The effect of lexical frequency on spoken word recognition in young and older listeners.Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024113 -
Samuel, A. G., & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(6), 1207–1218. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.6.1207 -
Scharenborg, O., & Janse, E. (2013). Comparing lexically guided perceptual learning in younger and older listeners.Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75(3), 525–36. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0422-4 -
Scharenborg, O., Weber, A., & Janse, E. (2015). The role of attentional abilities in lexically guided perceptual learning by older listeners.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(2), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0792-2 -
Schreiber, E., Onishi, K., & Clayards, M. (2013). Manipulating phonological boundaries using distributional cues.Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4801082 -
Schvartz, K. C., Chatterjee, M., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2008). Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(6), 3972–3988. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2997434 -
Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context.Psychology and Aging, 14(3), 458–472. -
Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2008). Motor-skill learning in older adults—A review of studies on age-related differences.European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 5(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11556-008-0030-9 -
Wilson, M. (1988). MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00..Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 20(1), 6–10.
Add to your Mendeley library