The Role of Cognition in Common Measures of Peripheral Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1978). Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry.ASHA, 20, 297–301.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory.Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging?.Psychology and Aging, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.12
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bergman, M., Blumenfeld, V. G., Cascardo, D., Dash, B., Levitt, H., & Margulies, M. K. (1976). Age-related decrement in hearing for speech: Sampling and longitudinal studies.Journal of Gerontology, 31(5), 533–538.
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bharadwaj, H. M., Masud, S., Mehraei, G., Verhulst, S., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2015). Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.Journal of Neuroscience, 35(5), 2161–2172. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3915-14.2015
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bramhall, N., Beach, E. F., Epp, B., Le Prell, C. G., Lopez-Poveda, E. A., Plack, C. J., … Canlon, B. (2019). The search for noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in humans: Mission impossible.Hearing Research, 377, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.02.016
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Bramhall, N. F., Konrad-Martin, D., McMillan, G. P., & Griest, S. (2017). Auditory brainstem response altered in humans with noise exposure despite normal outer hair cell function.Ear & Hearing, 38(1), 1–12.
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2011). Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal discrimination.PLOS ONE, 6(10), e25422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025422
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Buss, E., Hall, J. W., III., & Grose, J. H. (2004). Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss.Ear and Hearing, 25(3), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000130796.73809.09
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Carlozzi, N. E., Beaumont, J. L., Tulsky, D. S., & Gershon, R. C. (2015). The NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test: Normative data.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(5), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acv031
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Casaletto, K. B., Umlauf, A., Beaumont, J., Gershon, R., Slotkin, J., Akshoomoff, N., & Heaton, R. K. (2015). Demographically corrected normative standards for the English version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21(5), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715000351
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Coffey, E. B. J., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M. P., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016). Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG.Nature Communications, 7, 11070. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11070
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Coffey, E. B. J., Musacchia, G., & Zatorre, R. J. (2017). Cortical correlates of the auditory frequency-following and onset responses: EEG and fMRI evidence.Journal of Neuroscience, 37(4), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1265-16.2016
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions.Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Dikmen, S. S., Bauer, P. J., Weintraub, S., Mungas, D., Slotkin, J., Beaumont, J. L., … Heaton, R. K. (2014). Measuring episodic memory across the lifespan: NIH Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory Test.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(6), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000460
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. (1996). Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7(3), 183–189.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Frank, T., & Vavrek, M. J. (1992). Reference threshold levels for an ER-3A insert earphone.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 3(1), 51–59.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Fulbright, A. N. C., Le Prell, C. G., Griffiths, S. K., & Lobarinas, E. (2017). Effects of recreational noise on threshold and suprathreshold measures of auditory function.Seminars in Hearing, 38, 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606325
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C. (2013). Age-dependent changes in temporal-fine- structure processing in the absence of peripheral hearing loss.American Journal of Audiology, 22, 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0070)
  LinkGoogle Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B. C., & Stone, M. A. (2015). Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: Contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gelfand, S. A. (1982). Hearing: An introduction to psychological and physiological acoustics.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 45, 1175. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.45.12.1175-b
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Golomb, J. D., Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2007). Effects of stimulus variability and adult aging on adaptation to time-compressed speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(3), 1701–1708. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2436635
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., & Cole, S. S. (2016). Effects of age and working memory capacity on speech recognition performance in noise among listeners with normal hearing.Ear and Hearing, 37(5), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000316
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993). Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(6), 1276–1285. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1276
  LinkGoogle Scholar
• Grassi, M., & Borella, E. (2013). The role of auditory abilities in basic mechanisms of cognition in older adults.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 5, 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00059
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Grinn, S. K., Wiseman, K. B., Baker, J. A., & Le Prell, C. G. (2017). Hidden hearing loss? No effect of common recreational noise exposure on cochlear nerve response amplitude in humans.Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00465
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Grömping, U. (2015). Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package relaimpo.Journal of Statistical Software, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i01
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Grose, J. H., Buss, E., & Hall, J. W. (2017). Loud music exposure and cochlear synaptopathy in young adults: Isolated auditory brainstem response effects but no perceptual consequences.Trends in Hearing, 21, 233121651773741. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517737417
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Grose, J. H., & Mamo, S. K. (2010). Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age.Ear and Hearing, 31(6), 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e627e7
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Grose, J. H., Mamo, S. K., & Hall, J. W. (2009). Age effects in temporal envelope processing: Speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.Ear and Hearing, 30(5), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ac128f
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Guest, H., Munro, K. J., Prendergast, G., Millman, R. E., & Plack, C. J. (2018). Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram: No evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure.Hearing Research, 364, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.008
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• He, N., Mills, J. H., Ahlstrom, J. B., & Dubno, J. R. (2008). Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(6), 3841–3849. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2998779
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Heaton, R. K., Akshoomoff, N., Tulsky, D. S., Mungas, D., Dikmen, S., Beaumont, J., … Gershon, R. (2014). Reliability and validity of composite scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in adults.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(6), 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000241
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Hebbali, A. (2018). olsrr (Version 0.5.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/olsrr
  Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E. (1996). Speech understanding in the elderly.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 161–167.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Jerger, J., Jerger, S., & Pirozzolo, F. (1991). Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age, and cognitive abilities in the elderly.Ear and Hearing, 12(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198904000-00001
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Johannesen, P. T., Pérez-González, P., Kalluri, S., Blanco, J. L., & Lopez-Poveda, E. A. (2016). The influence of cochlear mechanical dysfunction, temporal processing deficits, and age on the intelligibility of audible speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.Trends in Hearing, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516641055
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, J. W., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research.Organizational Research Methods, 7(3), 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104266510
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Kohrman, D. C., Wan, G., Cassinotti, L., & Corfas, G. (2019). Hidden hearing loss: A disorder with multiple etiologies and mechanisms.Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a035493
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan, A., Gandour, J. T., & Bidelman, G. M. (2010). The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem.Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.09.001
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss.Journal of Neuroscience, 29(45), 14077–14085. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Le Prell, C. G. (2019). Effects of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech-in-noise tasks: A review of the literature.International Journal of Audiology, 58(Suppl. 1), S3–S32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1534010
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Le Prell, C. G., Siburt, H. W., Lobarinas, E., Griffiths, S. K., & Spankovich, C. (2018). No reliable association between recreational noise exposure and threshold sensitivity, distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude, or word-in-noise performance in a college student population.Ear and Hearing, 39(6), 1057–1074. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000575
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Mayer, C. L., Levitt, H., & Bergman, M. (1976). Effect of aging on speech reception in noise.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(Suppl. 1), S86–S86. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2002940
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Mishra, S., Stenfelt, S., Lunner, T., Rönnberg, J., & Rudner, M. (2014). Cognitive spare capacity in older adults with hearing loss.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00096
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (1989). Mechanisms underlying the frequency discrimination of pulsed tones and the detection of frequency modulation effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 2468–2478. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411967
  Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., & Sek, A. (1996). Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: Evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4, Pt. 1), 2320–2331. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.417941
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Moore, D. R., Edmondson-Jones, M., Dawes, P., Fortnum, H., McCormack, A., Pierzycki, R. H., & Munro, K. J. (2014). Relation between speech-in-noise threshold, hearing loss and cognition from 40–69 years of age.PLOS ONE, 9(9), e107720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107720
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Musacchia, G., Sams, M., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(40), 15894–15898. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701498104
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Musiek, F. E., Chermak, G. D., Bamiou, D.-E., & Shinn, J. (2018). CAPD: The most common “hidden hearing loss”.The ASHA Leader, 23, 6–9.
  LinkGoogle Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., … Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.Journal of the American Geriatriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Neher, T., Lunner, T., Hopkins, K., & Moore, B. C. J. (2012). Binaural temporal fine structure sensitivity, cognitive function, and spatial speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(4), 2561–2564. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3689850
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Noffsinger, D., Wilson, R. H., & Musiek, F. E. (1994). Department of Veterans Affairs compact disc recording for auditory perceptual assessment: Background and introduction.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 5(4), 231–235.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kramer, S. E., Eckert, M. A., Edwards, B., Hornsby, B. W., Humes, L. E., … Wingfield, A. (2016). Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).Ear and Hearing, 37, 5S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000312
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org
  Google Scholar
• Ridley, C. L., Kopun, J. G., Neely, S. T., Gorga, M. P., & Rasetshwane, D. M. (2018). Using thresholds in noise to identify hidden hearing loss in humans.Ear and Hearing, 39, 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000543
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Rossetti, H. C., Lacritz, L. H., Munro Cullum, C., & Weiner, M. F. (2011). Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample.Neurology, 77(13), 1272–1275. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318230208a
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Schaette, R., & McAlpine, D. (2011). Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: Physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model.Journal of Neuroscience, 31(38), 13452–13457. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010). Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: A tutorial.Ear and Hearing, 31(3), 302–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cdb272
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Slotkin, J., Kallen, M., Griffith, J., Magasi, S.Salsman, J., Nowinksi, C., & Gershon, R. (2012). NIH Toolbox technical manual: Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
  Google Scholar
• Smith, S. L., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Alexander, G. (2016). Development of the word auditory recognition and recall measure.Ear and Hearing, 37(6), e360–e376. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000329
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Song, J. H., Nicol, T. G., & Kraus, N. (2011). Test–retest reliability of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.Clinical Neurophysiology, 122(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.07.009
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Stamper, G. C., & Johnson, T. A. (2015). Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.Ear and Hearing, 36(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000107
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Strelcyk, O., & Dau, T. (2009). Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3328–3345. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3097469
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Tulsky, D. S., Carlozzi, N. E., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Beaumont, J. L., Kisala, P. A., Mungas, D., … Gershon, R. (2014). NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB): The list sorting test to measure working memory.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(6), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561771400040X
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Valderrama, J. T., Beach, E. F., Yeend, I., Sharma, M., Van Dun, B., & Dillon, H. (2018). Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.Hearing Research, 365, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.003
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third UK Edition (WAIS-III UK). Oxford, United Kingdom: Harcourt Assessment.
  Google Scholar
• Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Slotkin, J., … Gershon, R. (2014). The cognition battery of the NIH Toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: Validation in an adult sample.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(6), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000320
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield, A. (1996). Cognitive factors in auditory performance: Context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 175–182. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/94f9/eccb03c07f158391b9bdd557be403ef3f000.pdf
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• Wu, S. T., & Chiu, C. J. (2016). Age-related trajectories of memory function in middle-aged and older adults with and without hearing impairment.Neuroepidemiology, 46(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445378
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Yeend, I., Beach, E. F., & Sharma, M. (2019). Working memory and extended high-frequency hearing in adults: Diagnostic predictors of speech-in-noise perception.Ear and Hearing, 40(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000640
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Yeend, I., Beach, E. F., Sharma, M., & Dillon, H. (2017). The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.Hearing Research, 353, 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.006
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Yost, W. A. (1978). A forced-choice adaptive procedure for measuring auditory thresholds in children.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10(5), 671–677. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205369
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Zelazo, P. D. (2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children.Nature Protocols, 1(1), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.46
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar