Purpose

Nearly 50% of school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) provide services to school-age children who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). However, many SLPs report having insufficient knowledge in the area of AAC implementation. The objective of this tutorial is to provide clinicians with a framework for supporting 1 area of AAC implementation: vocabulary selection for preliterate children who use AAC.

Method

This tutorial focuses on 4 variables that clinicians should consider when selecting vocabulary: (a) contexts/environments where the vocabulary can be used, (b) time span during which the vocabulary will be relevant, (c) whether the vocabulary can elicit and maintain interactions with other people, and (d) whether the vocabulary will facilitate developmentally appropriate grammatical structures. This tutorial focuses on the role that these variables play in language development in verbal children with typical development, verbal children with language impairment, and nonverbal children who use AAC.

Results

Use of the 4 variables highlighted above may help practicing SLPs select vocabulary that will best facilitate language acquisition in preliterate children who use AAC.

References

  • Adamson, L. B., Romski, M. A., Deffebach, K., & Sevcik, R. A. (1992). Symbol vocabulary and the focus of conversations: Augmenting language development for youth with mental retardation.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(6), 1333–1343.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2014). Schools survey report: SLP caseload characteristics. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2014-Schools-Survey-SLP-Caseload-Characteristics.pdf
  • Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1999). Crews, wusses, and whoppas: Core and fringe vocabularies of Australian meal-break conversations in the workplace.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(2), 95–109.
  • Banajee, M., Dicarlo, C., & Buras Stricklin, S. (2003). Core vocabulary determination for toddlers.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(2), 67–73.
  • Beukelman, D., Jones, R., & Rowan, M. (1989). Frequency of word usage by nondisabled peers in integrated preschool classrooms.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(4), 243–248.
  • Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 323–338.
  • Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., Webb, E., & Buenviaje, E. (2017). Early sentence productions of 5-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(3), 131–142.
  • Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 123–138.
  • Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 160–176.
  • Boenisch, J., & Soto, G. (2015). The oral core vocabulary of typically developing English-speaking school-aged children: Implications for AAC practice.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(1), 77–84.
  • Booth, A. E., McGregor, K. K., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2008). Socio-pragmatics and attention: Contributions to gesturally guided word learning in toddlers.Language Learning and Development, 4(3), 179–202.
  • Bracken, B. A., & Crawford, E. (2010). Basic concepts in early childhood educational standards: A 50-state review.Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 421–430.
  • Bruner, J. (1981). The social context of language acquisition.Language & Communication, 1(2–3), 155–178.
  • Capone, N. C., & McGregor, K. K. (2005). The effect of semantic representation on toddlers' word retrieval.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1468–1480.
  • Carey, S. (1978). The child as a word learner.In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Cargill, L. P., & Street, M. (2016). Immediate and long-term AAC intervention planning. Talk presented at the Communication Matters conference, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Carlson, F. (1981). A format for selecting vocabulary for the nonspeaking child.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 12(4), 240–245.
  • Costigan, F. A., & Light, J. (2010). A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists.Assistive Technology, 22(4), 200–212.
  • Deckers, S. R., Van Zaalen, Y., Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Core vocabulary of young children with Down syndrome.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(2), 77–86.
  • Fey, M. (2008). Thoughts on grammar intervention in AAC.Perspective's on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 43–49.
  • Fields, A. (2015). Examining barriers with implementing augmentative and alternative communication in a Midwest school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for nonspeaking preschool children based on developmental and environmental language sources.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8(1), 41–56.
  • Gray, S. (2003). Word-learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: What predicts success?.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 56–67.
  • Hadley, P. A. (2006). Assessing the emergence of grammar in toddlers at risk for specific language impairment.Seminars in Speech and Language, 27(3), 173–186.
  • Hadley, P. A., Rispoli, M., & Hsu, N. (2016). Toddlers' verb lexicon diversity and grammatical outcomes.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47(1), 44–58.
  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
  • Holyfield, C., Drager, K. D. R., Kremkow, J. M. D., & Light, J. (2017). Systematic review of AAC intervention research for adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(4), 201–212.
  • Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast mapping but poor retention by 24-month-old infants.Infancy, 13(2), 128–157.
  • Hustad, K. C., & Miles, L. K. (2010). Alignment between augmentative and alternative communication needs and school-based speech-language services provided to young children with cerebral palsy.Early Childhood Services, 4(3), 129–140.
  • Iacono, T., Trembath, D., & Erickson, S. (2016). The role of augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism: Current status and future trends.Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 2349–2361.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, P.L. 108–446. (2004).
  • Johnson, B. W., & Fey, M. E. (2006). Interaction of lexical and grammatical aspect in toddlers' language.Journal of Child Language, 33(2), 419–435.
  • Lahey, M. (1988). Language disorders and language development. New York, NY: MacMillan.
  • Marvin, C. A., Beukelman, D. R., & Bilyeu, D. (1994). Vocabulary-use patterns in preschool children: Effects of context and time sampling.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10(4), 224–236.
  • McCarthy, J. H., Schwartz, I., & Ashworth, M. (2017). The availability and accessibility of basic concept vocabulary in AAC software: A preliminary study.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 131–138.
  • McFadd, E., & Wilkinson, K. (2010). Qualitative analysis of decision making by speech-language pathologists in the design of aided visual displays.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(2), 136–147.
  • McGregor, K. K., Newman, R. M., Reilly, R. M., & Capone, N. C. (2002). Semantic representation and naming in children with specific language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(5), 998–1014.
  • O'Neill, D. (2009). Language use inventory: An assessment of young children's pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month old children. Manual. Waterloo, ON: Knowledge in Development.
  • Owens, R. E. (2016). Language development an introduction (9th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Ratcliff, A., Koul, R., & Lloyd, L. L. (2008). Preparation in augmentative and alternative communication: An update for speech-language pathology training.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(1), 48–59.
  • Robillard, M., Mayer-Crittenden, C., Minor-Corriveau, M., & Bélanger, R. (2014). Monolingual and bilingual children with and without primary language impairment: Core vocabulary comparison.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(3), 267–278.
  • Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. A. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities.Infants and Young Children, 18(3), 174–185.
  • Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Barton-Hulsey, A., & Whitmore, A. S. (2015). Early intervention and AAC: What a difference 30 years makes.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(3), 181–202.
  • Savaldi Harussi, G., Lustigman, L., & Soto, G. (2017). From words to clauses: The emergence of clause construction in children who use SGDs. Talk presented at the American-Speech-Language-Hearing-Association Convention, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Schlosser, R., & Lee, D. (2000). Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(4), 208–226.
  • Schlosser, R., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 102–123.
  • Sennott, S. C., Light, J. C., & McNaughton, D. (2016). AAC modeling intervention research review.Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 41(2), 101–115.
  • Smith, M., & Grove, N. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication.In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 163–195). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
  • Snodgrass, M. R., Stoner, J. B., & Angell, M. E. (2013). Teaching conceptually referenced core vocabulary for initial augmentative and alternative communication.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(4), 322–333.
  • Storkel, H., Voelmle, K., Fierro, V., Flake, K., Fleming, K. K., & Swinburne Romine, R. (2017). Interactive book reading to accelerate word learning by kindergarten children with specific language impairment: Identifying an adequate intensity and variation in treatment response.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48, 16–30.
  • Tan, X. Y., Trembath, D., Bloomberg, K., Iacono, T., & Caithness, T. (2014). Acquisition and generalization of key word signing by three children with autism.Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17(2), 125–136.
  • Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2015). Building evidence-based practices in AAC display design for children: Current practices and future directions.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 124–136.
  • Trembath, D., Balandin, S., & Togher, L. (2007). Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication.Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32(4), 291–301.
  • Waddington, H., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., & Sigafoos, J. (2017). Teaching a child with ASD to approach communication partners and use a speech-generating device across settings: Clinic, school, and home.Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 32(3–4), 228–243.
  • Walker, E. A., & McGregor, K. K. (2013). Word learning processes in children with cochlear implants.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 375–387.

Additional Resources