Remote Microphone System Use in the Homes of Children With Hearing Loss: Impact on Caregiver Communication and Child Vocalizations
Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 63, Number 2
Pages 633-642
Abstract
Purpose
This study examined the impact of home use of remote microphone systems (RMSs) on caregiver communication and child vocalizations in families of children with hearing loss.
Method
We drew on data from a prior study in which Language ENvironmental Analysis recorders were used with 9 families during 2 consecutive weekends—1 that involved using an RMS and 1 that did not. Audio samples from Language ENvironmental Analysis recorders were (a) manually coded to quantify the frequency of verbal repetitions and alert phrases caregivers utilized in communicating to children with hearing loss and (b) automatically analyzed to quantify children's vocalization rate, duration, complexity, and reciprocity when using and not using an RMS.
Results
When using an RMS at home, caregivers did not repeat or clarify their statements as often as when not using an RMS while communicating with their children with hearing loss. However, no between-condition differences were observed in children's vocal characteristics.
Conclusions
Results provide further support for home RMS use for children with hearing loss. Specifically, findings lend empirical support to prior parental reports suggesting that RMS use eases caregiver communication in the home setting. Studies exploring RMS use over a longer duration of time might provide further insight into potential long-term effects on children's vocal production.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Akhtar, N. (2005). The robustness of learning through overhearing. Developmental Science, 8(2), 199–209.
Akhtar, N., Jipson, J., & Callanan, M. A. (2001). Learning words through overhearing. Child Development, 72(2), 416–430.
American National Standards Institute. (2010). Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, Parts 1 and 2 (ANSI S12.60-2010). New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
Anderson, K. L., & Goldstein, H. (2004). Speech perception benefits of RMS and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(2), 169–184.
Benítez-Barrera, C., Angley, G., & Tharpe, A. M. (2018). Remote microphone use in the homes of children with hearing loss: Impact on parent and child language production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(2), 399–409.
Benítez-Barrera, C., Thompson, E., Angley, G., Woynaroski, T., & Tharpe, A. M. (2019). Remote microphone use at home: Impact on child-directed speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(6), 2002–2008.
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chapman, R. S. (2000). Children's language learning: An interactionist perspective. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(1), 33–54.
Curran, M., Walker, E., Roush, P., & Spratford, M. (2019). Using propensity-score matching to address clinical questions: The impact of remote-microphone systems on language outcomes in children who are hard of hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(3), 564–576.
Eisenberg, L. S., Shannon, R. V., Martinez, A. S., Wygonski, J., & Boothroyd, A. (2000). Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2704–2710.
Floor, P., & Akhtar, N. (2006). Can 18-month-old infants learn words by listening in on conversations. Infancy, 9(3), 327–339.
Flynn, T. S., Flynn, M. C., & Gregory, M. (2005). The FM advantage in the real classroom. Journal of Educational Audiology, 12, 37–44.
Fusaroli, R., Weed, E., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. (2019). Hearing me hearing you: Reciprocal effects between child and parent language in autism and typical development. Cognition, 183, 1–18.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
Harbison, A. L., Woynaroski, T. G., Tapp, J., Wade, J. W., Warlaumont, A. S., & Yoder, P. J. (2018). A new measure of child vocal reciprocity in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 11(6), 903–915.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 73(2), 418–433.
Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 295–308.
Masur, E. F., Flynn, V., & Eichorst, D. L. (2005). Maternal responsive and directive behaviours and utterances as predictors of children's lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32(1), 63–91.
McDuffie, A., & Yoder, P. (2010). Types of parent verbal responsiveness that predict language in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(4), 1026–1039.
Moeller, M. P., Donaghy, K. F., Beauchaine, K. L., Lewis, D. E., & Stelmachowicz, P. G. (1996). Longitudinal study of RMS use in nonacademic settings: Effects on language development. Ear and Hearing, 17(1), 28–41.
Mulla, I. (2011). Preschool use of RMS amplification technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) . University of Manchester, England.
Mulla, I., & McCracken, W. (2014). Frequency modulation for preschoolers with hearing loss. Seminars in Hearing, 35(3), 206–216.
Newman, R., Rowe, M., & Ratner, N. B. (2016). Input and uptake at 7 months predicts toddler vocabulary: The role of child-directed speech and infant processing skills in language development. Journal of Child Language, 43(5), 1158–1173.
Oller, D. K., Niyogi, P., Gray, S., Richards, J. A., Gilkerson, J., Xu, D., … Warren, S. F. (2010). Automated vocal analysis of naturalistic recordings from children with autism, language delay, and typical development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(30), 13354–13359.
Pearsons, K. S., Bennett, R. L., & Fidell, S. (1977). Speech levels in various noise environments (Report No. EPA-600/1-77-025) . Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35, 185–205.
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774.
Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81(1), 6–22.
Schafer, E. C., & Thibodeau, L. M. (2006). Speech recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and RMS-system arrangements. American Journal of Audiology, 15(2), 114–126.
Shneidman, L. A., Arroyo, M. E., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). What counts as effective input for word learning. Journal of Child Language, 40, 672–686.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Snyder-McLean, L. (1990). Communication development in the first two years: A transactional process. Zero to Three, 11, 13–20.
Tapp, J. (2015). MOOSES for Windows (Version 4.8.8.0) . Retrieved from http://mooses.vueinnovations.com
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152.
Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 519–527.
Woynaroski, T., Oller, D. K., Keceli-Kaysili, B., Xu, D., Richards, J. A., Gilkerson, J., … Yoder, P. J. (2017). The stability and validity of automated vocal analysis in minimally verbal preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 10, 508–519.
Woynaroski, T., Yoder, P. J., Fey, M. E., & Warren, S. F. (2014). A transactional model of spoken vocabulary variation in toddlers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 1754–1763.
Wu, Y. H., Stangl, E., Chipara, O., Hasan, S. S., Welhaven, A., & Oleson, J. (2018). Characteristics of real-world signal to noise ratios and speech listening situations of older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 39(2), 293–304.
Xu, D., Richards, J., & Gilkerson, J. (2014). Automated analysis of child phonetic production using naturalistic recordings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1638–1650.
Xu, D., Yapanel, U., & Gray, S. (2009). Reliability of the LENATM language environment analysis system in young children's natural home environment. Retrieved from http://www.lenafoundation.org/TechReport.aspx/Reliability/LTR-05-2
Yoder, P. J., Bottema-Beutel, K., Woynaroski, T., Chandrasekhar, R., & Sandbank, M. (2013). Social communication intervention effects vary by dependent variable type in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 7(4), 150–174.
Yoder, P., Wade, J., Tapp, J., Warlaumont, A., & Harbison, A. L. (2016). Contingencies from LENA data. Retrieved from https://github.com/HomeBankCode/LENA_contingencies
Zimmerman, F. J., Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Christakis, D. A., Xu, D., Gray, S., & Yapanel, U. (2009). Teaching by listening: The importance of adult-child conversations to language development. Pediatrics, 124(1), 342–349.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 63 • Number 2 • February 2020
Pages: 633-642
PubMed: 31967941
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
History
- Received: Apr 8, 2019
- Revised: Jul 29, 2019
- Accepted: Oct 10, 2019
- Published online: Jan 22, 2020
- Published in issue: Feb 26, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Metrics
View all metricsCitations
Download article citation data for:
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Citing Literature
- Annerenée Meijer, Michel Ruben Benard, Aart Woonink, Deniz Başkent, Evelien Dirks, The Auditory Environment at Early Intervention Groups for Young Children With Hearing Loss: Signal to Noise Ratio, Background Noise, and Reverberation, Ear & Hearing, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001627, 46, 3, (827-837), (2025).
- Bianca Stephany Barbosa Vital, Karen Melissa Gonzaga dos Santos, Aryelly Dayane da Silva Nunes Araújo, Joseli Soares Brazorotto, Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Sheila Andreoli Balen, Sistemas de microfone remoto em crianças e adolescentes com transtorno do espectro autista: revisão de escopo, CoDAS, 10.1590/2317-1782/e20230310pt, 37, 2, (2025).
- Bianca Stephany Barbosa Vital, Karen Melissa Gonzaga dos Santos, Aryelly Dayane da Silva Nunes Araújo, Joseli Soares Brazorotto, Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Sheila Andreoli Balen, Remote microphone systems in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review, CoDAS, 10.1590/2317-1782/e20230310en, 37, 2, (2025).
- Kacie Dunham-Carr, Nisha Mailapur, Bahar Keçeli-Kaysili, Jacob I. Feldman, Emily Thompson, Hilary Davis, Anne Marie Tharpe, Erin Picou, Tiffany G. Woynaroski, Remote Microphone Systems for Autistic and Nonautistic Youth: Effects on Audiovisual Task Engagement, Ear & Hearing, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001581, 46, 2, (325-335), (2024).
- Pam Millett, The Connected Life: Using Access Technology at Home, at School and in the Community, Education Sciences, 10.3390/educsci13080761, 13, 8, (761), (2023).
- Amanda M. Griffin, Ava Atri, Greg Licameli, Derek J. Stiles, Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss, Ear & Hearing, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001310, (2022).
- Teresa Y.C. Ching, Linda Cupples, Vicky W. Zhang, Predicting 9-Year Language Ability from Preschool Speech Recognition in Noise in Children Using Cochlear Implants, Trends in Hearing, 10.1177/23312165221090395, 26, (2022).
- Kristyna Gabova, Zdenek Meier, Peter Tavel, Parents’ experiences of remote microphone systems for children with hearing loss, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10.1080/17483107.2022.2128443, 19, 3, (831-840), (2022).
- Kristyna Gabova, Zdenek Meier, Peter Tavel, Why do many children who are hard of hearing not use remote microphones to compensate for their hearing loss?, Heliyon, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10590, 8, 9, (e10590), (2022).
- Jacob I. Feldman, Emily Thompson, Hilary Davis, Bahar Keceli-Kaysili, Kacie Dunham, Tiffany Woynaroski, Anne Marie Tharpe, Erin M. Picou, Remote Microphone Systems Can Improve Listening-in-Noise Accuracy and Listening Effort for Youth With Autism, Ear & Hearing, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001058, 43, 2, (436-447), (2022).
View Options
Sign In Options
ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.
Member Login