No access
Research Article
19 June 2019

Remote Microphone System Use at Home: Impact on Child-Directed Speech

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 62, Number 6
Pages 2002-2008

Abstract

Purpose

The impact of home use of a remote microphone system (RMS) on the caregiver production of, and child access to, child-directed speech (CDS) in families with a young child with hearing loss was investigated.

Method

We drew upon extant data that were collected via Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) recorders used with 9 families during 2 consecutive weekends (RMS weekend and no-RMS weekend). Audio recordings of primary caregivers and their children with hearing loss obtained while wearing and not wearing an RMS were manually coded to estimate the amount of CDS produced. The proportion of CDS that was likely accessible to children with hearing loss under both conditions was determined.

Results

Caregivers produced the same amount of CDS when using and when not using the RMS. However, it was concluded that children with hearing loss, on average, could potentially access 12% more CDS if caregivers used an RMS because of their distance from their children when talking to them.

Conclusion

Given our understanding of typical child language development, findings from this investigation suggest that children with hearing loss could receive auditory, speech, and language benefits from the use of an RMS in the home environment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ambrose, S. E., Walker, E. A., Unflat-Berry, L. M., Oleson, J. J., & Moeller, M. P. (2015). Quantity and quality of caregivers' linguistic input to 18-month and 3-year-old children who are hard of hearing. Ear and Hearing, 36(Suppl. 1), 48S–59S.
Anderson, K. L., & Goldstein, H. (2004). Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(2), 169–184.
Benítez-Barrera, C. R., Angley, G. P., & Tharpe, A. M. (2018). Remote microphone system use at home: Impact on caregiver talk. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(2), 399–409.
Ching, T. Y., O'Brien, A., Dillon, H., Chalupper, J., Hartley, L., Hartley, D., … Hain, J. (2009). Directional effects on infants and young children in real life: Implications for amplification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(5), 1241–1254.
Dilley, L., Wieland, E., Lehet, M., Arjmandi, M. K., Houston, D., & Bergeson, T. (2018). Quality and quantity of infant-directed speech by maternal caregivers predicts later speech-language outcomes in children with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143, 1822. Retrieved from https://asa.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1121/1.5035984
Flynn, T. S., Flynn, M. C., & Gregory, M. (2005). The FM advantage in the real classroom. Journal of Educational Audiology, 12, 37–44.
Fulcher, A., Purcell, A. A., Baker, E., & Munro, N. (2012). Listen up: Children with early identified hearing loss achieve age-appropriate speech/language outcomes by 3 years-of-age. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 76(12), 1785–1794.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Owen, M. T., Golinkoff, R. M., Pace, A., … Suma, K. (2015). The contribution of early communication quality to low-income children's language success. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1071–1083.
Lewis, D. E., Valente, D. L., & Spalding, J. L. (2015). Effect of minimal/mild hearing loss on children's speech understanding in a simulated classroom. Ear and Hearing, 36(1), 136–144.
Lund, E. (2015). Vocabulary knowledge of children with cochlear implants: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(2), 107–121.
McCreery, R. W., Walker, E. A., Spratford, M., Oleson, J., Bentler, R., Holte, L., & Roush, P. (2015). Speech recognition and parent-ratings from auditory development questionnaires in children who are hard of hearing. Ear and Hearing, 36(Suppl. 1), 60S–75S.
Moeller, M. P., Donaghy, K. F., Beauchaine, K. L., Lewis, D. E., & Stelmachowicz, P. G. (1996). Longitudinal study of FM system use in nonacademic settings: Effects on language development. Ear and Hearing, 17(1), 28–41.
Nittrouer, S. (2010). Early development of children with hearing loss. San Diego, CA: Plural.
Oller, D. K., Niyogi, P., Gray, S., Richards, J. A., Gilkerson, J., Xu, D., … Warren, S. F. (2010). Automated vocal analysis of naturalistic recordings from children with autism, language delay, and typical development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(30), 13354–13359.
Quittner, A. L., Cruz, I., Barker, D. H., Tobey, E., Eisenberg, L. S., Niparko, J. K., & Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation Investigative Team. (2013). Effects of maternal sensitivity and cognitive and linguistic stimulation on cochlear implant users' language development over four years. The Journal of Pediatrics, 162(2), 343.e3–348.e3.
Ricketts, T., Galster, J., & Tharpe, A. M. (2007). Directional benefit in simulated classroom environments. American Journal of Audiology, 16(2), 130–144.
Romeo, R. R., Leonard, J. A., Robinson, S. T., West, M. R., Mackey, A. P., Rowe, M. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2018). Beyond the 30-million-word gap: Children's conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function. Psychological Science, 29(5), 700–710.
Szagun, G., & Rüter, M. (2009). The influence of parents' speech on the development of spoken language in German-speaking children with cochlear implants. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 29(3), 165–173.
Tapp, J. (2015). MOOSES for Windows (Version 4.8.8.0). Retrieved from http://mooses.vueinnovations.com
Tapp, J., & Walden, T. (1993). PROCODER: A professional tape control, coding, and analysis system for behavioral research using videotape. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25(1), 53–56.
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57(6), 1454–1463.
Tomblin, J. B., Harrison, M., Ambrose, S. E., Walker, E. A., Oleson, J. J., & Moeller, M. P. (2015). Language outcomes in young children with mild to severe hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 36(Suppl. 1), 76S–91S.
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152.
Wouters, J., & Vanden Berghe, J. (2001). Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implantees with a two-microphone monaural adaptive noise reduction system. Ear and Hearing, 22(5), 420–430.
Woynaroski, T. (2014). The stability and validity of automated vocal analysis in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder in the early stages of language development (Doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Xu, D., Yapanel, U., & Gray, S. (2009). Reliability of the LENATM language environment analysis system in young children's natural home environment. Retrieved from http://www.lenafoundation.org/TechReport.aspx/Reliability/LTR-05-2
Yoder, P., & Symons, F. (2010). Observational measurement of behavior. New York, NY: Springer.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 62Number 6June 2019
Pages: 2002-2008
PubMed: 31112670

History

  • Received: Aug 11, 2018
  • Revised: Oct 21, 2018
  • Accepted: Jan 2, 2019
  • Published online: May 21, 2019
  • Published in issue: Jun 19, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Carlos R. Benítez-Barrera
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
Emily C. Thompson
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
Gina P. Angley
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
Tiffany Woynaroski
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
Anne Marie Tharpe
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to Carlos R. Benítez-Barrera: [email protected]
Editor-in-Chief: Frederick (Erick) Gallun
Editor: Steve Aiken

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Sistemas de microfone remoto em crianças e adolescentes com transtorno do espectro autista: revisão de escopo, CoDAS, 10.1590/2317-1782/e20230310pt, 37, 2, (2025).
  • Remote microphone systems in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review, CoDAS, 10.1590/2317-1782/e20230310en, 37, 2, (2025).
  • Tecnologia auditiva assistiva em usuários de implante coclear em ambientes reverberantes com múltiplas fontes de ruído, Audiology - Communication Research, 10.1590/2317-6431-2023-2778pt, 29, (2024).
  • Assistive listening technology in cochlear implant users in reverberant environments with multiple noise sources, Audiology - Communication Research, 10.1590/2317-6431-2023-2778en, 29, (2024).
  • Remote Microphone Systems for Autistic and Nonautistic Youth: Effects on Audiovisual Task Engagement, Ear & Hearing, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001581, 46, 2, (325-335), (2024).
  • The Connected Life: Using Access Technology at Home, at School and in the Community, Education Sciences, 10.3390/educsci13080761, 13, 8, (761), (2023).
  • Wireless technologies for children with hearing loss from early childhood to pre-school age (parents experience), Pediatrie pro praxi, 10.36290/ped.2022.028, 23, 2, (130-133), (2022).
  • Adesão ao uso do Sistema de Microfone Remoto em estudantes com deficiência auditiva usuários de dispositivos auditivos, CoDAS, 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020326, 34, 3, (2022).
  • Remote Microphone Systems Can Improve Listening-in-Noise Accuracy and Listening Effort for Youth With Autism, Ear & Hearing, 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001058, 43, 2, (436-447), (2022).
  • Parents’ experiences of remote microphone systems for children with hearing loss, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10.1080/17483107.2022.2128443, 19, 3, (831-840), (2022).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share