No AccessLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in SchoolsClinical Focus7 Apr 2020

Explicit Grammatical Intervention for Developmental Language Disorder: Three Approaches


    This article summarizes the shared principles and evidence underpinning methods employed in the three sentence-level (syntactic) grammatical intervention approaches developed by the authors. We discuss associated clinical resources and map a way forward for clinically useful research in this area.


    We provide an overview of the principles and perspectives that are common across our three syntactic intervention approaches: MetaTaal (Zwitserlood, 2015; Zwitserlood, Wijnen, et al., 2015), the SHAPE CODING™ system (Ebbels, 2007; Ebbels et al., 2014, 2007), and Complex Sentence Intervention (Balthazar & Scott, 2017, 2018). A description of each approach provides examples and summarizes current evidence supporting effectiveness for children with developmental language disorder ranging in age from 5 to 16 years. We suggest promising directions for future research that will advance our understanding of effective practices and support more widespread adoption of syntactic interventions with school-age children.


    In each approach to syntactic intervention, careful and detailed analysis of grammatical knowledge is used to support target selection. Intervention targets are explicitly described and presented systematically using multimodal representations within engaging and functional activities. Treatment stimuli are varied within a target pattern in order to maximize learning. Similar intervention intervals and intensities have been studied and proven clinically feasible and have produced measurable effects. We identify a need for more research evidence to maximize the effectiveness of our grammatical interventions, encompassing languages other than English, as well as practical clinical tools to guide target selection, measurement of outcomes, and decisions about how to tailor interventions to individual needs.


    • Ambridge, B., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children's acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction.Cognitive Development, 21(2), 174–193.
    • Balthazar, C. H., & Scott, C. M. (2014). The place of syntax in schoolage language assessment and intervention.In T. Ukrainetz (Ed.), Schoolage language intervention: Principles and procedures for oral and written language success. Pro-Ed.
    • Balthazar, C. H., & Scott, C. M. (2017). Complex sentence intervention.In R. McCauley, M. Fey, & R. Gillam (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders (2nd ed.). Brookes.
    • Balthazar, C. H., & Scott, C. M. (2018). Targeting complex sentences in older school children with specific language impairment: Results from an early phase treatment study.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(3), 713–728.
    • Birsh, J. R. (2005). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (2nd ed.). Brookes.
    • Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG-2). The Psychological Corporation.
    • Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., &CATALISE Consortium. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology.The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1068–1080.
    • Bryan, A. (1997). Colourful semantics: Thematic role therapy.In S. Chiat, J. Law, & J. Marshall (Eds.), Language disorders in children and adults: Psycholinguistic approaches to therapy (pp. 143–161). Whurr.
    • Calder, S. D., Claessen, M., Ebbels, S., & Leitão, S. (2020). Explicit grammar intervention in young school-aged children with developmental language disorder: An efficacy study using single-case experimental design.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 298–316.
    • Calder, S. D., Claessen, M., & Leitão, S. (2018). Combining implicit and explicit intervention approaches to target grammar in young children with developmental language disorder.Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 34(2), 171–189.
    • Cirrin, F. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2008). Language intervention practices for school-age children with spoken language disorders: A systematic review.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39(1), S110–S137.
    • Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education.Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
    • Clegg, J., Hollis, C., Mawhood, L., & Rutter, M. (2005). Developmental language disorders a follow-up in later adult life. Cognitive, language and psychosocial outcomes.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 128–149.
    • Conti-Ramsden, G. (2008). Heterogeneity of specific language impairment (SLI): Outcomes in adolescence.In C. F. Norbury, B. Tomblin, & D. V. M. Bishop (Eds.), Understanding developmental language disorders (pp. 117–130). Psychology Press.
    • Conti-Ramsden, G., & Durkin, K. (2012). Postschool educational and employment experiences of young people with specific language impairment.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(4), 507–520.
    • Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K., Toseeb, U., Botting, N., & Pickles, A. (2018). Education and employment outcomes of young adults with a history of developmental language disorder.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(2), 237–255.
    • Dawson, J., Stout, C., & Eyer, J. (2003). Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test 3 (SPELT-3). Pro-Ed.
    • Develing, H. (2018). Metalanguage: MetaTaal inzetten bij lessen Engels [Metalanguage: Using MetaTaal for English lessons]. Paper presented at Simea Conference, Lunteren, the Netherlands.
    • Ebbels, S. H. (2007). Teaching grammar to school-aged children with specific language impairment using shape coding.Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23(1), 67–93.
    • Ebbels, S. H. (2014). Effectiveness of intervention for grammar in school-aged children with primary language impairments: A review of the evidence.Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(1), 7–40.
    • Ebbels, S. H., Maric, N., Murphy, A., & Turner, G. (2014). Improving comprehension in adolescents with severe receptive language impairments: A randomised control trial of intervention for coordinating conjunctions.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(1), 30–48.
    • Ebbels, S. H., & van der Lely, H. K. (2001). Meta-syntactic therapy using visual coding for children with severe persistent SLI.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36(Suppl), 345–350.
    • Ebbels, S. H., van der Lely, H. K. J., & Dockrell, J. E. (2007). Intervention for verb argument structure in children with persistent SLI: A randomized control trial.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1330–1349.
    • Fey, M. E., Catts, H., Proctor-Williams, K., Tomblin, J. B., & Zhang, X. (2004). Oral and written story composition skills of children with language impairment.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1301–1318.
    • Finestack, L. H. (2018). Evaluation of an explicit intervention to teach novel grammatical forms to children with developmental language disorder.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(8), 2062–2075.
    • Finestack, L. H., & Fey, M. E. (2009). Evaluation of a deductive procedure to teach grammatical inflections to children with language impairment.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 289–302.
    • Finestack, L. H., & Satterlund, K. E. (2018). Current practice of child grammar intervention: A survey of speech-language pathologists.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(4), 1329–1351.
    • Freunthaller, A. (1937). Die Signal-Methode [The signal method].Journal of Special Education/Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 1–36.
    • Gillam, R. B., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning impaired and normally achieving school-age children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(6), 1303–1315.
    • Gillam, R. B., Montgomery, J. W., Evans, J. L., & Gillam, S. L. (2019). Cognitive predictors of sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder: Implications for assessment and treatment.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 21(3), 240–251.
    • Gillam, S. L., Fargo, J. D., &Robertson, K. (2009). Comprehension of expository text: Insights gained from think-aloud data.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 82–94.
    • Heilmann, J. J. (2010). Myths and realities of language sample analysis.SIG 1 Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 17(1), 4–8.
    • Kamhi, A. G., & Koenig, L. A. (1985). Metalinguistic awareness in normal and language-disordered children.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16(3), 199–210.
    • Kan, P. F., & Windsor, J. (2010). Word learning in children with primary language impairment: A meta-analysis.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(3), 739–756.
    • Kulkarni, A., Pring, T., & Ebbels, S. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of SHAPE CODING therapy to develop the use of regular past tense morphemes in two children with language impairments.Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(3), 245–254.
    • Law, J., Rush, R., Schoon, I., & Parsons, S. (2009). Modeling developmental language difficulties from school entry into adulthood: Literacy, mental health, and employment outcomes.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(6), 1401–1416.
    • Lea, J. (1970). The colour pattern scheme: A method of remedial language teaching. Moor House School & College.
    • Leonard, L. B. (2011). The primacy of priming in grammatical learning and intervention: A tutorial.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(2), 608–621.
    • Leonard, L. B. (2014). Children with specific language impairment (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
    • Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve (Research Report No. 18). National Council of Teachers of English.
    • Lum, J., Conti-Ramsden, G., Page, D., & Ullman, M. (2012). Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment.Cortex, 48(9), 1091–1250.
    • Marinellie, S. (2004). Complex syntax used by school-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) in child–adult conversation.Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(6), 517–533.
    • McGregor, K. K., Sheng, L., & Ball, T. (2007). Complexities of expressive word learning over time.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(4), 353–364.
    • Menyuk, P., Chesnick, M., & Green, M. (1993). Developmental changes in metalinguistic abilities of language impaired children. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA, United States.
    • Montgomery, J. W., Evans, J. L., Fargo, J., Schwarz, S., & Gillam, R. B. (2018). Structural relationship between cognitive processing and syntactic sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(12), 2950–2976.
    • Newton, C., Kirby, P., & Bruce, C. (2017). Getting into shape: The effect of SHAPE CODING on the spoken language production of two men with chronic aphasia.Aphasiology, 31(12), 1459–1481.
    • Nippold, M. A. (2010). Explaining complex matters: How knowledge of a domain drives language.In M. A. Nippold & C. M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 41–61). Psychology Press.
    • Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. C., Billow, J. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009). Syntactic development in adolescents with language impairments: A follow-up investigation.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 241–251.
    • Norbury, C. F., Gooch, D., Wray, C., Baird, G., Charman, T., Simonoff, E., Vamvakas, G., & Pickles, A. (2016). The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: Evidence from a population study.The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(11), 1247–1257.
    • Perera, K. (1984). Children's writing and reading. Blackwell.
    • Pinto, M., & Zuckerman, S. (2019). Coloring Book: A new method for testing language comprehension.Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2609–2628.
    • Plante, E., & Gómez, R. L. (2018). Learning without trying: The clinical relevance of statistical learning.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3S), 710–722.
    • Plante, E., Ogilvie, T., Vance, R., Aquilar, J., Dailey, N., Meyers, C., & Burton, R. (2014). Variability in the language input to children enhances learning in a treatment context.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(4), 530–545.
    • Proctor-Williams, K. (2009). Dosage and distribution in morphosyntax intervention.Topics in Language Disorders, 29(4), 294–311.
    • Proctor-Williams, K., & Fey, M. E. (2007). Recast density and acquisition of novel irregular past tense verbs.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1029–1047.
    • Rice, M. L., Hoffman, L., & Wexler, K. (2009). Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of specific language impairment (SLI) to 15 years: A study of growth and asymptote.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1417–1433.
    • Rice, M. L., & Wexler, K. (2001). Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. University of Kansas.
    • Riches, N. G., Tomasello, M., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2005). Verb learning in children with SLI: Frequency and spacing effects.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1397–1411.
    • Sankey, M., Birch, D., & Gardiner, M. (2010). Engaging students through multimodal learning environments: The journey continues.In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology and transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings of Ascilite Sydney (pp. 852–863). The University of Queensland.
    • Scott, C. M. (1988). Spoken and written syntax.In M. Nippold (Ed.), Later language development: Ages nine through nineteen (pp. 49–95). College-Hill Press.
    • Scott, C. M., & Balthazar, C. (2010). The grammar of information: Challenges for older students with language impairments.Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 288–307.
    • Scott, C. M., & Balthazar, C. (2013). The role of complex sentence knowledge in children with reading and writing difficulties.Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 39(3), 18–30.
    • Scott, C. M., & Koonce, N. (2014). Syntactic contributions to literacy learning.In A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & G. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (2nd ed., pp. 283–301). Guilford.
    • Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse in school-age children with language learning disabilities.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(3), 324–339.
    • Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fourth Edition (CELF-4). Harcourt.
    • Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417.
    • Tobin, L. M., & Ebbels, S. H. (2019). Effectiveness of intervention with visual templates targeting tense and plural agreement in copula and auxiliary structures in school-aged children with complex needs: A pilot study.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(1–2), 175–190.
    • Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., Buckwalter, P., Zhang, X., Smith, E., & O'Brien, M. (1997). Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.Journal of Speech Language, and Hearing Research, 40(6), 1245–1260.
    • Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X., Buckwalter, P., & O'Brien, M. (2003). The stability of primary language disorder: Four years after kindergarten diagnosis.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(6), 1283–1296.
    • Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis.Cortex, 41(3), 399–433.
    • Van Geel, C. A. A. (1973). Terreinverkenning van de therapiebijvertraagdespraak- en taalontwikkeling. Toepassing van ‘Grammatica in vorm en kleur’ [Exploration of Therapy for Speech and Language Delay. Application of ‘Grammar in Form and Colour’]. StudiecentrumHoensbroeck, Training School for Speech and Language Therapy/OpleidingLogopedie.
    • Zwitserlood, R. (2014). Language growth in Dutch school-age children with specific language impairment (LOT Dissertation Series 356). Utrecht University.
    • Zwitserlood, R. (2015). MetaTaal.Dutch Journal of Speech Therapy/NederlandsTijdschrift Voor Logopedie, 16, 6–13.
    • Zwitserlood, R., van Weerdenburg, M., Verhoeven, L., & Wijnen, F. (2015). Development of morphosyntactic accuracy and grammatical complexity in Dutch school-age children with SLI.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 891–905.
    • Zwitserlood, R., Wijnen, F., van Weerdenburg, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). ‘MetaTaal’: Enhancing complex syntax in children with specific language impairment—A metalinguistic and multimodal approach.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(3), 273–279.

    Additional Resources