In healthy speakers, the more frequent and probable a word is in its context, the shorter the word tends to be. This study investigated whether these probabilistic effects were similarly sized for speakers with dysarthria of different severities.

Method

Fifty-six speakers of New Zealand English (42 speakers with dysarthria and 14 healthy speakers) were recorded reading the Grandfather Passage. Measurements of word duration, frequency, and transitional word probability were taken.

Results

As hypothesized, words with a higher frequency and probability tended to be shorter in duration. There was also a significant interaction between word frequency and speech severity. This indicated that the more severe the dysarthria, the smaller the effects of word frequency on speakers' word durations. Transitional word probability also interacted with speech severity, but did not account for significant unique variance in the full model.

Conclusions

These results suggest that, as the severity of dysarthria increases, the duration of words is less affected by probabilistic variables. These findings may be due to reductions in the control and execution of muscle movement exhibited by speakers with dysarthria.

References

Anderson, A. H., & Howarth, B. (2002). Referential form and word duration in video-mediated and face-to-face dialogues.In A. Pease, S. Colton, A. Smaill, & J. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. pp. (13–20). EDILOG.
Google Scholar
Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.Language and Speech, 47(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470010201
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2006). Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3048–3058. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2188331
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). CELEX2 LDC96L14. Linguistic Data Consortium.
Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Shafaei-Bajestan, E. (2019). languageR: Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. R package Version 1.5.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR
Google Scholar
Baker, R. E., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009). Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody.Language and Speech, 52(4), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909336575
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Crossref Google Scholar
Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English.Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003
Crossref Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat.Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.04) [Computer software]. https://www.praat.org
Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. (2002). Confluent talker-and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production.Laboratory Phonology, 7. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105.241
Google Scholar
Brants, T., & Franz, A. (2006). Web 1T 5-gram corpus version 1.1 [Computer software].. Google Inc. https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2006T13
Google Scholar
Chiu, Y. F., & Forrest, K. (2017). The interaction of lexical characteristics and speech production in Parkinson's disease.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0333
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Connaghan, K. P., & Patel, R. (2017). The impact of contrastive stress on vowel acoustics and intelligibility in dysarthria.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0291
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (3rd ed.). Elsevier Mosby.
Google Scholar
Fletcher, A. R., McAuliffe, M. J., Lansford, K. L., & Liss, J. M. (2017). Assessing vowel centralization in dysarthria: A comparison of methods.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0355
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Fletcher, A. R., McAuliffe, M. J., Lansford, K. L., Sinex, D. G., & Liss, J. M. (2017). Predicting intelligibility gains in individuals with dysarthria from baseline speech features.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(11), 3043–3057. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0218
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Fletcher, A. R., Wisler, A. A., McAuliffe, M. J., Lansford, K. L., & Liss, J. M. (2017). Predicting intelligibility gains in dysarthria through automated speech feature analysis.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(11), 3058–3068. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0453
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Fox, J. (2003). Effect displays in R for generalised linear models.Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v08/i15/
Crossref Google Scholar
Fromont, R., & Hay, J. (2008). ONZE Miner: The development of a browser-based research tool.Corpora, 3(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000142
Crossref Google Scholar
Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech.Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006
Crossref Google Scholar
Goldrick, M., McClain, R., Cibelli, E., Adi, Y., Gustafson, E., Moers, C., & Keshet, J. (2019). The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(6), 1107–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000633
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Hartelius, L., Runmarker, B., Andersen, O., & Nord, L. (2000). Temporal speech characteristics of individuals with multiple sclerosis and ataxic dysarthria: ‘Scanning speech’ revisited.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 52(5), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1159/000021538
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Hawker, T., Gardiner, M., & Bennetts, A. (2007). Practical queries of a massive n-gram database.In N. Colineau & M. Dras (Eds.), Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Workshop 2007. (pp. 40–48). ACL Anthology. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/U07-1008
Google Scholar
Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
Crossref Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2004). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In spontaneous speech: Data and analysis. In K. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st session of the 10th International Symposium (pp. 29–54). The National International Institute for Japanese Language.
Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production.In J. L. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (Eds.) (Vol. frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure pp. 229–254). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.13jur
Google Scholar
Kim, H., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., & Perlman, A. (2010, May). Acoustic cues to lexical stress in spastic dysarthria. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2010, Fifth International Conference, Chicago, IL, USa.
Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Kent, R. D., & Weismer, G. (2011). An acoustic study of the relationships among neurologic disease, dysarthria type, and severity of dysarthria.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(2), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0020)
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208–1221. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380986
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech.Language and Speech, 6(3), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096300600306
Crossref Google Scholar
Liss, J. M., Spitzer, S., Caviness, J. N., Adler, C., & Edwards, B. (1998). Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(4), 2457–2466. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423753
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Liss, J. M., & Weismer, G. (1994). Selected acoustic characteristics of contrastive stress production in control geriatric, apraxic, and ataxic dysarthric speakers.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 8(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699209408985574
Crossref Google Scholar
Liss, J. M., White, L., Mattys, S. L., Lansford, K., Lotto, A. J., Spitzer, S. M., & Caviness, J. N. (2009). Quantifying speech rhythm abnormalities in the dysarthrias.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(5), 1334–1352. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0208)
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.477
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
McHenry, M. (1998). The ability to effect intended stress following traumatic brain injury.Brain Injury, 12(6), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990598122458
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Moers, C., Janse, E., & Meyer, A. (2015, August). Probabilistic reduction in reading aloud: A comparison of younger and older adults. Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015), Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Google Scholar
Moers, C., Meyer, A., & Janse, E. (2016). Effects of word frequency and transitional probability on word reading durations of younger and older speakers.Language and Speech, 60(2), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916649215
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Myers, B. R., & Watson, D. G. (2019). Paying the meter: Effect of metrical similarity on word lengthening.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1941–1947. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01635-4
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Google Scholar
Robb, M. P., Maclagan, M. A., & Chen, Y. (2004). Speaking rates of American and New Zealand varieties of English.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269920031000105336
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1
Crossref Google Scholar
Sheard, C., Adams, R. D., & Davis, P. J. (1991). Reliability and agreement of ratings of ataxic dysarthric speech samples with varying intelligibility.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3402.85
ASHAWire Google Scholar
Smiljanić, R., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009). Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes.Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00112.x
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Spitzer, S. M., Liss, J. M., & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: A study of resynthesized speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(6), 3678–3687. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2801545
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.514
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Watson, P. J., & Munson, B. (2008). Parkinson's disease and the effect of lexical factors on vowel articulation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(5), EL291–EL295. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2987464
Crossref Medline Google Scholar
Young, S., Evermann, G., Kershaw, D., Moore, G., Odell, J., Ollason, D., Povey, D., Valtchev, V., & Woodland, P. (2002). The HTK-Book 3.2. Cambridge University.
Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., Hartmann, E., & Hoole, P. (1993). Syllabic timing in dysarthria.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(4), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3604.683
ASHAWire Google Scholar