No access
SIG 1 Language Learning and Education
Viewpoint
17 December 2020

The Duality of Patterning in Language and Its Relationship to Reading in Children With Hearing Loss

Publication: Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Volume 5, Number 6
Pages 1400-1409

Abstract

Purpose

Duality of patterning has long been recognized as a unique design feature of human language and refers to the distinct bilevel structure in which words comprise one level (semantic) and word-internal, phonetic elements comprise the other level (phonological). This report describes this design feature and offers a perspective on why and how it should help shape reading interventions for children with hearing loss.

Method

Three components comprise this report. The first main section offers an overview of duality of patterning. The second main section reviews results from a longitudinal study illustrating how children with and without hearing loss acquire each level of linguistic structure and how each level contributes to reading acquisition for each group differently. The third main section of this report provides suggestions for how to incorporate this information into interventions for children with hearing loss.

Results

Outcomes presented illustrate that semantic structure begins to take form first, with phonological structure following. Semantic structure is related to reading comprehension, and phonological structure is related to word recognition, at least for alphabetic orthographies. Children with hearing loss acquire a less differentiated linguistic system, with structure at the phonological level only partly or coarsely acquired and with a lack of clear distinction from the semantic level of structure. Consequently, the roles of each level of structure in reading acquisition are less clearly defined for children with hearing loss.

Conclusion

For children with normal hearing, learning to read is compartmentalized: Emerging sensitivity to phonological structure supports development of word recognition, and semantic-level skills support reading comprehension. Hearing loss diminishes language skills overall, but especially phonological sensitivity. Children with hearing loss, especially those with cochlear implants, must rely on all language skills to learn to read, including both word recognition and reading comprehension, which creates a highly inefficient processing strategy.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Apel, K., & Werfel, K. (2014). Using morphological awareness instruction to improve written language skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 251–260.
Bolhuis, J. J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. C. (2014). How could language have evolved. PLOS Biology, 12(8), e1001934.
Brownell, R. (2000). Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test–Third Edition (EOWPVT-3). Academic Therapy.
Byers, B. E., & Kroodsma, D. E. (2009). Female mate choice and songbird song repertoires. Animal Behaviour, 77(1), 13–22.
Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL). Pearson Assessments.
Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1995). An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children's receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 727–735.
de Boer, B., Sandler, W., & Kirby, S. (2012). New perspectives on duality of patterning: Introduction to the special issue. Language and Cognition, 4(4), 251–259.
Falk, D. (2004). Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence motherese? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(4), 491–503.
Gelb, I. J. (1963). A study of writing. University of Chicago Press.
Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89–96.
Huettig, F., Kolinsky, R., & Lachmann, T. (2018). The culturally co-opted brain: How literacy affects the human mind. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(3), 275–277.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1992). Developing phonological categories from the speech signal. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Models, research, and implications (pp. 17–64). York Press.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1993). From general to language-specific capacities: The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21(1–2), 3–28.
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2006). Qualitative Reading Inventory–Fourth Edition. Pearson.
Lieberman, P. (2015). Language did not spring forth 100,000 years ago. PLOS Biology, 13(2), e1002064.
McDermott, K. B., Petersen, S. E., Watson, J. M., & Ojemann, J. G. (2003). A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia, 41(3), 293–303.
Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic and phonological capabilities. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Development, writing and other language processes (pp. 3–50). Academic Press.
Menyuk, P., & Menn, L. (1979). Early strategies for the perception and production of words and sounds. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 49–70). Cambridge University Press.
Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 47–56.
Mintz, T. H. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90(1), 91–117.
Nittrouer, S. (2006). Children hear the forest. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 1799–1802.
Nittrouer, S. (2010). Early development of children with hearing loss. Plural.
Nittrouer, S., & Caldwell-Tarr, A. (2016). Language and literacy skills in children with cochlear implants: Past and present findings. In N. Young & K. I. Kirk (Eds.), Pediatric cochlear implantation: Learning and the brain (pp. 177–197). Springer.
Nittrouer, S., Caldwell-Tarr, A., & Lowenstein, J. H. (2013). Working memory in children with cochlear implants: Problems are in storage, not processing. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 77(1), 1886–1898.
Nittrouer, S., Caldwell-Tarr, A., Sansom, E., Twersky, J., & Lowenstein, J. H. (2014). Nonword repetition in children with cochlear implants: A potential clinical mearker of poor language acquisition. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(4), 679–695.
Nittrouer, S., Lowenstein, J. H., & Antonelli, J. (2020). Parental language input to children with hearing loss: Does it matter in the end? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(1), 234–258.
Nittrouer, S., Lowenstein, J. H., & Holloman, C. (2016). Early predictors of phonological and morphosyntactic skills in second graders with cochlear implants. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 55, 143–160.
Nittrouer, S., Muir, M., Tietgens, K., Moberly, A. C., & Lowenstein, J. H. (2018). Development of phonological, lexical, and syntactic abilities in children with cochlear implants across the elementary grades. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(10), 2561–2577.
Odom, K. J., Hall, M. L., Riebel, K., Omland, K. E., & Langmore, N. E. (2014). Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nature Communications, 5, 3379.
Poldrack, R. A., Wagner, A. D., Prull, M. W., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1999). Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 10(1), 15–35.
Price, C. J., Moore, C. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Wise, R. J. S. (1997). Segregating semantic from phonological processes during reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 727–733.
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Padden, C. (2011). The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 503–543.
Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232–246.
Sims, H. C. (1982). History of writing and its relevance in dyslexia. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 75(11), 918.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Pscychology, 38(2), 175–190.
Storkel, H. L. (2002). Restructuring of similarity neighbourhoods in the developing mental lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 29(2), 251–274.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1987). The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading, and writing (pp. 67–84). Academic Press.
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1998). Introduction: The emergence of phonology. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases (pp. 169–176). Cambridge University Press.
Wacewicz, S., & Żywiczyński, P. (2015). Language evolution: Why Hockett's design features are a non-starter. Biosemiotics, 8, 29–46.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Pro-Ed.
Walley, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13(3), 286–350.
Walley, A. C., Metsala, J. L., & Garlock, V. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing, 16, 5–20.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415–438.
Zhou, Y., McBride, C., Leung, J. S. M., Wang, Y., Joshi, M., & Farver, J. (2018). Chinese and English reading-related skills in L1 and L2 Chinese-speaking children in Hong Kong. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(3), 300–312.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Volume 5Number 617 December 2020
Pages: 1400-1409

History

  • Received: Feb 14, 2020
  • Revised: May 20, 2020
  • Accepted: Jun 9, 2020
  • Published online: Aug 6, 2020
  • Published in issue: Dec 17, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville

Notes

Disclosures
Financial: Susan Nittrouer has no relevant financial interests to disclose.
Nonfinancial: Susan Nittrouer has no relevant nonfinancial interests to disclose.
Correspondence to Susan Nittrouer: [email protected]
Editor: Laura Green
Publisher Note: This article is part of the Forum: Literacy and Language Issues in Children With Hearing Loss.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Semantic processing in children with Cochlear Implants: A review of current N400 studies and recommendations for future research, Biological Psychology, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108655, 182, (108655), (2023).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share