Planning for Implementation Science in Clinical Practice Research: An Augmentative and Alternative Communication Example

References

• Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & McCue Horwitz, S. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors.Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Allen, A. A., Schlosser, R. W., Brock, K. L., & Shane, H. C. (2017). The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: A systematic review.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1338752
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Batorowicz, B. (2019). Fundamentals of the ImPAACT Program.ISAAC On-Line Journal Club. https://doi.org/isaac-online.org/wp-content/uploads/Presentation-B-Batorowicz-May-6-2019.pdf
  Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist.BMC Psychology, 3(1), 32–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Isakson, K., Kyablue, R., & McNallen, C. (2016). AAC services in the schools: Parent and administrator perspectives [Poster presentation]. Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, Philadelphia, United States.
  Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2012). Selecting skills to teach communication partners: Where do I start?.SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(4), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac21.4.127
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802130978
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Harrington, N., & Evelyn, S. (2021). Word by word: Supporting sentence development for children who use AAC [Manuscript in preparation]. The University of New Mexico.
  Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Harrington, N., & Hollerbach, Q. (2020). Tracking early sentence-building progress in graphic symbol communication.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00065
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., & Mansfield, L. (2017). Early sentence productions of 3- and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(7), 1930–1945. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0408
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., Webb, E., & Buenviaje, E. (2017). Early sentence productions of 5-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(3), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740116655804
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600807470
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0163)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Richter, K., Taylor, A., Williams, E. K., & Willman, A. (2019). Error patterns and revisions in the graphic symbol utterances of 3- and 4-year-old children who need augmentative and alternative communication.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2019.1576224
  Google Scholar
• Birken, S., Powell, B., Shea, C., Haines, E., Kirk, M. A., Leeman, J., Bohweder, C., Damschroder, L., & Presseau, J. (2017). Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: Results from an international survey.Implementation Science, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cane, J., O'Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.Implementation Science, 7(37), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
  Google Scholar
• Clemson, L., Laver, K., Jeon, Y. H., Comans, T. A., Scanlan, J., Rahja, M., Culph, J., Low, L. F., Day, S., Cations, M., Crotty, M., Kurrle, S., Piersol, C., & Gitlin, L. N. (2018). Implementation of an evidence-based intervention to improve the wellbeing of people with dementia and their carers: Study protocol for “Care of People with dementia in their Environments (COPE)” in the Australian context.BMC Geriatrics, 18(1), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0790-7
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cook, C. R., Lyon, A. R., Locke, J., Waltz, T., & Powell, B. J. (2019). Adapting a compilation of implementation strategies to advance school-based implementation research and practice.Prevention Science, 20(6), 914–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01017-1
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Cox, J., Linthwaite, B., Engler, K., Lessard, D., Lebouché, B., & Kronfli, N. (2020). A type II implementation-effectiveness hybrid quasi-experimental pilot study of a clinical intervention to re-engage people living with HIV into care, “Lost & Found”: An implementation science protocol.Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6(1), 29–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-0559-6
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Curran, G., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.Medical Care, 50(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• De Poli, C., Oyebode, J. R., Binns, C., Glover, R., & Airoldi, M. (2020). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 study evaluating an intervention to support “information work” in dementia care: An implementation study protocol.BMJ Open, 10(12), e038397. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038397
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, N., & Burshnic, V. (2019). Implementation science: Tackling the research to practice gap in communication sciences and disorders.Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_PERS-ST-2018-0000
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, N., Feuerstein, J. L., Oshita, J., Schliep, M., & Danowski, M. (2021). Implementation science research in communication sciences and disorders: A scoping review. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Central Michigan University.
  Google Scholar
• Feldstein, A., & Glasgow, R. (2008). A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice.The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34(4), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34030-6
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida.
  Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., Ory, M. G., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2019). RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review.Frontiers in Public Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Glasgow, R., Vogt, T., & Boles, S. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM Framework.American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Glisson, C. (2015). The role of organizational culture and climate in innovation and effectiveness.Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership, & Governance, 39(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1087770
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Harden, S., Strayer, T., Smith, M., Gaglio, B., Ory, M., Rabin, B., Estabrooks, P., & Glasgow, R. (2020). National working group on the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Goals, resources, and future directions.Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00390
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Holtrop, J. S., Rabin, B. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2018). Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: Rationale and methods.BMC Health Services Research, 18, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2938-8
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J. (2003). The effects of an educational assistant instructional program on the communicative turns of students who use augmentative and alternative communication during book reading activities. (Publication No. 3106268) [Doctoral thesis, The Pennsylvania State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
  Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & Binger, C. (2018). Methodological advances, opportunities, and challenges in AAC research.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1456560
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Hasham, Z. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0014)
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Malani, M. D. (2010). Teaching partners to support the communication skills of young children who use AAC: Lessons from the ImPAACT program.Early Childhood Services, 4(3), 155–170.
  Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400006646
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K. A., Malani, M. D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Stark, C., & Binger, C. (2008). Tales from school trenches: AAC service-delivery and professional expertise.Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1079128
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Landes, S. J., McBain, S. A., & Curran, G. M. (2019). An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs.Psychiatry Research, 280, 112513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112513
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Leppin, A., Mahoney, J., Stevens, K., Bartels, S., Baldwin, L., Dolor, R., Proctor, E., Scholl, L., Moore, J., Baumann, A., Rohweder, C., Luby, J., & Meissner, P. (2019). Situating dissemination and implementation sciences within and across the translational research spectrum.Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 4(3), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2019.392
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, C. C., Klasnja, P., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Tuzzio, L., Jones, S., Walsh-Bailey, C., & Weiner, B. (2018). From classification to causality: Advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science.Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00136
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• McCreight, M., Rabin, B., Glasgow, R., Ayele, R., Leonard, C., Gilmartin, H., Frank, J., Hess, P., Burke, R., & Battaglia, C. (2019). Using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to qualitatively assess multilevel contextual factors to help plan, implement, evaluate, and disseminate health services programs.Translational Behavioral Medicine, 9(6), 1002–1011. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz085
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Mills, T., Lawton, R., & Sheard, L. (2019). Advancing complexity science in healthcare research: The logic of logic models.BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0701-4
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Mormer, E., & Stevans, J. (2019). Clinical quality improvement and quality improvement research.Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_PERS-ST-2018-0003
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Moullin, J., Dickson, K., Stadnick, N., Rabin, B., & Aarons, G. (2019). Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.Implementation Science, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. (2017). Implementation science information and resources. Fogarty International Center. https://www.fic.nih.gov/researchtopics/pages/implementationscience.aspx
  Google Scholar
• Olswang, L. B., & Prelock, P. (2015). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Implementation science.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(6), 1627–S1882. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0305
  ASHAWireGoogle Scholar
• Powell, B., Waltz, T., Chinman, M., Damschroder, L., Smith, J., Mattieu, M., Proctor, E., & Kirchner, J. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.Implementation Science, 10(21), 21–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Rabin, B., Glasgow, R., Ford, B., Huebschmann, A., March, R., Tabak, R., Brownson, R., Malone, S., & Padek, M. (2021). Dissemination & implementation models in health research & practice. http://dissemination-implementation.org
  Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.
  Google Scholar
• Rosa-Lugo, L., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2008). Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading.Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740108320353
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Schliep, M. E., Alonzo, C. N., & Morris, M. A. (2017). Beyond RCTs: Innovations in research design and methods to advance implementation science.Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 11(3–4), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2017.1394807
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• SLP Nerdcast. (2020). Partner training in AAC. https://www.slpnerdcast.com/episodes/partner-training-in-aac
  Google Scholar
• Stirman, S. W., Baumann, A. A., & Miller, C. J. (2019). The FRAME: An expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions.Implementation Science, 14(1), 58–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Thatcher, A. (2009). Teaching a school-based AAC team to support the communication skills of a student who requires AAC [University of New Mexico]. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/shs_etds/
  Google Scholar
• Timpe, E., Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., Hahs-Vaughn, D., Harrington, N., & Schwartz, J. (2021). Using the ImPAACT Program with preschoolers with Down syndrome: A hybrid service-delivery model.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 37(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2021.1921025
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Van Donsel, M. (2017). Implementation of AAC.Idaho Assistive Technology Project. https://idahotc.com/Resources/View/ID/236
  Google Scholar
• Villeval, M., Gaborit, E., Berault, F., Lang, T., & Kelly-Irving, M. (2019). Do the key functions of an intervention designed from the same specifications vary according to context? Investigating the transferability of a public health intervention in France.Implementation Science, 14(1), 35–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0880-8
  CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
• Wynne, J. (2019). AAC research summary: Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals who use AAC: A meta-analysis. NWACS AACademics, nwacs.info/blog/2019/5/aacademics-may-2019.
  Google Scholar