No access
Research Article
4 June 2021

Relative Clause Sentence Comprehension by Japanese-Speaking Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment

Publication: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 64, Number 6
Pages 1929-1943

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the auditory comprehension of Japanese sentences including relative clauses (RCs) by 52 Japanese-speaking children with typical development (TD) and 16 children with specific language impairment (SLI).

Method

A picture-pointing task measured RC and main clause (MC) comprehension for object and subject relatives in sentences with varying lengths. The accuracy of RC only, MC only, and combined comprehension (RC and MC) was analyzed with linear mixed-effects (logistic) models to examine accuracy and the effects of the deep gap–filler distance (structural complexity), the surface linear distance, and sentence length for the two participant groups. Six language tests and two working memory tests were administered to determine language and working memory status. A factor analysis grouped them into two factors that were examined as predictors of comprehension performance.

Results

Initial models indicated that children with SLI performed more poorly than their peers with TD. Working memory abilities predicted the comprehension of subject and object relative sentences, but language abilities other than a general measure of sentence comprehension were only limited predictors. In a series of pairwise comparisons, children with SLI did not exhibit comprehension facilitation for RC sentences with lower structural complexity, nor did they exhibit comprehension facilitation when the linear distance between the gap and the filler was shorter, perhaps because of their overall lower performance. Children with TD made more errors on sentences with higher structural complexity but did not exhibit any linear distance effects. Neither group exhibited effects of noun phrase or sentence length.

Conclusions

Japanese-speaking children with TD exhibited negative comprehension effects of increased deep structure complexity, but not of linear surface distance or sentence noun phrase length. The children with SLI face challenges in comprehending both subject and object relative sentences compared to their typically developing peers. Their poorer working memory abilities are the primary factor that constrains their performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Amano, N., & Kondou, K. (1999). NTT database series-Nihongo no goitokusei [Lexical properties of Japanese]. Sanseido.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Test for reception of grammar. Pearson.
de Villiers, J., Tager-Flusberg, H., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 499–518.
Booth, J., MacWhinney, B., & Harasaki, Y. (2000). Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development, 71(4), 981–1003.
Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2004). The comprehension of wh-questions in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(4), 802–815.
Felser, C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition, 11(3), 127–163.
Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2), 250–272.
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 661–681.
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2007). Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer? Brain and Language, 101(1), 50–63.
Frizelle, P., & Fletcher, P. (2014). Relative clause constructions in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(2), 255–264.
Frizelle, P., & Fletcher, P. (2015). The role of memory in processing relative clauses in children with specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(1), 47–59.
Fukuda, S., Fukuda, S., Ito, T., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2007). Grammatical impairment of case assignment in Japanese children with specific language impairment. The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 48, 95–104.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76.
Hakuta, K. (1981). Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese. Cognition, 9(3), 197–236.
Hara, K. (2012). Youjiki・Gakudouki no oninishiki no hattatsu [Development of phonological awareness of Japanese children aged from 4 to 12]. The Journal of Acoustical Society of Japan, 68, 260–265.
Hestvik, A., Schwartz, R. G., & Tornyova, L. (2010). Relative clause gap-filling in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 443–456.
Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90(1), 3–27.
Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. American Guidance Service.
Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.
King, J. W., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580–602.
Kwon, N., Kluender, R., Kutas, M., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Subject/object processing asymmetries in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from ERP data. Language, 89(3), 537–585.
Leonard, L. B. (1989). Language learnability and specific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10(2), 179–202.
Leonard, L. B., Deevy, P., Fey, M. E., & Brendin-Oja, S. L. (2013). Sentence comprehension in specific language impairment: A task designed to distinguish between cognitive capacity and syntactic complexity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 577–589.
Maekawa, H., Nakayama, T., & Okazaki, S. (2007). Japanese version of Das–Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System. Nihonbunkakagakusha.
Magimairaj, B. M., & Montgomery, J. W. (2012). Children's verbal working memory: Role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(3), 669–682.
Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2007). On-line processing on wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(5), 557–582.
Marton, K., & Schwartz, R. G. (2003). Working memory capacity and language processes in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(5), 1138–1153.
Matsubara, T., Fujita, K., Maekawa, H., & Ishikuma, T. (1993). Japanese version of Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Maruzen Mates.
Miyamoto, E., & Nakamura, M. (2003). Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 342–355). Cascadilla Press.
Mizumoto, G. (2010). Youji no bunrikai ni oyobosu working memory youryou no eikyou -kankeisetsubun・bunretsubun no rikai karano kentou [Individual differences in children's working memory capacity and their sentence comprehension: Relative clause and cleft sentences]. Kyushu University Papers in Linguistics, 31, 131–143.
Montgomery, J. W. (2000). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43(2), 293–308.
Montgomery, J. W. (2004). Sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: Effects of input rate and phonological working memory. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(1), 115–134.
Montgomery, J. W., & Evans, J. L. (2009). Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 269–288.
Montgomery, J. W., Magimairaj, B. M., & O'Malley, M. H. (2008). Role of working memory in typically developing children's complex sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 331–354.
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive assessment system. Riverside Publishing.
Nakagawa, Y., Koyama, T., & Suga, T. (2010). J.COSS Nihongo rikai tesuto [Japanese test for comprehension of syntax and semantics] . Kazama Shobou.
O'Grady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. University of Chicago Press.
Sato, A. (2010). Effects of discourse function on the processing of relative clauses in Japanese: Through the corpus research and behavioral experiment. Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, Part 2, Arts and Science Education, 59, 269–277.
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(3), 272–281.
Suzuki, T. (2011). A case marking cue for filler–gap dependencies in children's relative clauses in Japanese. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1084–1095.
Tanaka, Y., Watanabe, J., Shiraishi, K., & Menn, L. (2001). Japanese preschool children with specific language impairment: A preliminary exploration of language characteristics. The Japanese Journal of Communication Disorders, 18, 2–9.
Tavakolian, S. (1978). The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses and other structures. In H. Goodluck & L. Solan (Eds.), Papers in the structure and development of child language (pp. 37–83). UMass Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Ueno, K., Fujita, K., Maekawa, H., Ishikuma, T., Dairoku, K., & Matsuda, O. (2011). Japanese version of the Wechsler Scale for Children–Fourth Edition. Nihonbunkakagakusha.
Ueno, K., Nagoshi, S., & Konuki, S. (2008). PVT-R Kaigagoi Hattatsukensa [PVT-R Picture Vocabulary Test] . Nihonbunkakagakusha.
Ueno, M., & Garnsey, S. M. (2008). An ERP study of processing of the subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(5), 646–688.
van der Lely, H. K., & Battell, J. (2003). Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language, 79(1), 153–181.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). The Psychological Corporation.
Weighall, A. R., & Altmann, G. (2011). The role of working memory and contextual constraints in children's processing relative clauses. Journal of Child Language, 38(3), 579–605.
Wiig, E., Secord, W., & Semel, E. (2004). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Preschool 2. The Psychological Corporation.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume 64Number 6June 2021
Pages: 1929-1943
PubMed: 33956514

History

  • Received: Jul 5, 2019
  • Revised: Mar 1, 2020
  • Accepted: Jan 15, 2021
  • Published online: May 6, 2021
  • Published in issue: Jun 4, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Miho Sasaki
Chofu City Child Development Center, Chofu, Tokyo, Japan
Richard G. Schwartz
Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York
Masaki Hisano
Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofu, Tokyo, Japan
Makihiko Suzuki
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato, Tokyo, Japan

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing interests existed at the time of publication.
Correspondence to Miho Sasaki: [email protected]
Editor-in-Chief: Stephen M. Camarata
Editor: Jan de Jong

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Metrics
View all metrics



Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Citing Literature

  • Syntax comprehension in Persian-speaking students with ADHD, BMC Psychiatry, 10.1186/s12888-025-06842-z, 25, 1, (2025).
  • Production of relative clauses in Cantonese-speaking children with and without Developmental Language Disorder, Brain and Language, 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105425, 254, (105425), (2024).
  • The role of working memory in the comprehension of syntactically complex sentences in children with and without developmental language disorder: A literature review, Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 10.12681/psy_hps.32457, 28, 2, (205-222), (2023).
  • Relative clause comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without developmental language disorder, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0288021, 18, 11, (e0288021), (2023).
  • Acquisition of Mandarin long passives by children with developmental language disorder, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10.1080/02699206.2023.2212116, 38, 3, (260-284), (2023).
  • Comprehension of complex syntax by non-English-speaking children with developmental language disorder: A scoping review, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 10.1080/02699206.2022.2135024, 37, 11, (1050-1068), (2022).
  • Abilities of children with developmental language disorders in perceiving phonological, grammatical, and semantic structures, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10.1007/s10803-022-05548-5, 53, 11, (4483-4487), (2022).
  • Revisiting Subject–Object Asymmetry in the Production of Cantonese Relative Clauses: Evidence From Elicited Production in 3-Year-Olds, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679008, 12, (2021).

View Options

Sign In Options

ASHA member? If so, log in with your ASHA website credentials for full access.

Member Login

View options

PDF

View PDF

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share